검색결과

검색조건
좁혀보기
검색필터
결과 내 재검색

간행물

    분야

      발행연도

      -

        검색결과 4

        1.
        2018.06 KCI 등재 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
        This study was conducted to examine the effect of joint mobilization on forward head posture and to propose an effective method to improve correct body posture and balance. A total of eight patients from a Maitland-applied group (n=8) received mobilization therapy to increase the mobility of the cervical joint, with Maitland's movement grade III intensity for 30 seconds of treatment and 30 seconds of rest, for ten intervals, three times a week for four weeks. The craniovertebral angle (CVA) changes before and after the intervention with the Maitland technique were measured as 56.85 ± 2.31° before, 63.23 ± 2.23° two weeks after, and 64.98 ± 1.27° four weeks after joint intervention. There were significant CVA changes before and after the Maitland technique (P <.05). The results of this study suggest that the Maitland technique is useful for improving the head vertebral angle in patients with forward head posture
        4,000원
        2.
        2006.10 KCI 등재 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
        목적 : 본 연구는 뇌졸중 환자가 퇴원 후 가정에서 필요한 작업치료가 무엇인지 가족을 대상으로 가정작업치료에 대한 요구도를 알아보았다. 앞으로 가정작업치료사 제도를 보건․의료정책 제안의 기초자료로 활용하고자 시도하였다.연구방법 : 연구의 대상은 2004년 7월부터 8월까지 뇌졸중을 경험한 환자의 가족 168명에게 가정에서 필요한 작업치료가 무엇인지 직접 면접을 통해 자료를 수집하였다. 수집된 자료는 SAS를 이용하여 분석하였다. 측정도구는 본 연구자가 개발한 가정작업치료 요구도로서 37문항의 4점 척도였다.결과 : 대상자 168명 중 가정작업치료가 필요하다고 응답한 가족은 149명(88.6%)이었다. 대상자의 직업이 있는 경우, 가정경제가 보통인 경우 가정작업치료 요구도가 높았다. 뇌졸중 환자의 질병 특성에 따른 요구도를 보면 언어장애, 시각장애, 배뇨문제, 연하곤란이 있는 경우 가정작업치료 요구도가 유의하게 높았으며, 장애등급 1급이 2, 3급에 비하여 가정작업치료 요구도가 유의하게 높았다(p=0.0001). 범주별 가정작업치료 요구도 순위는 운동성 요구도가 가장 높았으며, 다음은 이동성 요구도, 수단적 ADL 요구도, 자조활동 요구도, 사회성훈련하기 요구도 등의 순위였다.결론 : 이상의 연구결과에서 뇌졸중 환자의 가족은 가정작업치료를 매우 필요로 하는 것을 보았을 때, 앞으로 가정작업치료는 우리에게 수행되어야 할 많은 연구의 전망을 가져다주고 있다.
        4,500원
        3.
        1999.08 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
        CVA(Cerebro-Vascular Accidant) and HLD(Herniated Lumbar Disc) induces psychiatric disorders as well as neural disorders. In oriental medical treatment and management of CVA patients(group A) and HLD patients(group B), these psychiatric disorders are as major and important as neural disorders. For investigating the rate and difference of psychiatric disorders between two groups, We examined them with SCL-90-R(Symptoms Check List-90-R), Beck Depression Inventory(BDI), State-trait Anxiety Inventory(STAI) among psychological test. then the results are as follows; 1. In group A, phobic Anxiety was most high, and somatization, psychoticism, depression, anxiety, hostility, interpersonal sensitivity, obsessive-compulsive and paranoid ideation were located by score. 2. In group B, somatization was most high, and phobic anxiety, hostility, depression, psychoticism, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity and paranoid ideation were located by score 3. According to SCR-90-R test, group A were significantly increased compared to group B in phobic anxiety 4. According to STAI test, group A were significantly increased compared to group B in state anxiety and trait anxiety 5. According to BDI test, group A were significantly increased compared to group B in depression we might be suggested that CVA patients had more serious psychiatric disorders than HLD patients. therefore, CVA patients must be treated and managed more actively than HLD patients
        4,000원
        4.
        1996.10 KCI 등재 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
        The purpose of this study is to validate of 5 scale-MBI as ADL asessment instrument for stroke patients. The subject was 34 patients following CVA on rehabilitation ther- apy in the rehabilitation hospital, Yonsei medical center. They were assessed with FIM, and 5 scale-MBI in a day. There scores were taken statistics through SAS package, so that we have Pearson's R score. The results is following. 1) FIM and 5 scale-MBI scores averaged 86. 21, 62. 32. 2) On Pearson's R score between FIM and 5 scale MBI was 0. 9345(p(0.001). Therefore there was a very high correlation. 3) On Pearson's R score between motorFIM and MBI was 0.8565(p(0.001), between cog- nitive FIM and MBI was 0.4641(p(0.01). There was significant. 4) On Pearson's R score between same category of FIM and MBI - self care, sphincter control, mobility, locomotion - each others was 0.8960, 0.6974, 0.8585, 0.8540 (p(0.001 ) . In conclusion, 5 scale MBI was found to be useful scale to assess the stroke patients.
        4,000원