외국인 이사회 및 주주의 기업 성과에 관한 연구는 논란이 많은 주제이다. 몇몇 연구들은 외국인 지배구조가 기업 지배 과정에 공헌할 것이라고 하는 반면에, 다른 연구들은 단기적 수익성 악화로 인해 조직 성과에 부정적이라고 주장한다. 하지만, 이러한 연구들 가운데 외국인 이사 및 주주가 해외 성과에 미치는 영향은 아직까지 연구가 활발히 이루어지지 않는 실정이다. 본 연구는 자원기 반관점과 대리인이론을 바탕으로 기업지배구조의 외국인 사내 이사, 외국인 사외 이사, 외국인 주 주가 기업의 해외 성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 본 연구는 2012년부터 2014년 동안 한국의 비금융 KOSPI 기업들을 대상으로 외국인 사외이사와 외국인 주주의 유의미한 결과를 보여주었다. 본 연구 결과에 따르면, 기업지배구조에서의 과도한 외국인 비중은 필요한 정보 획득 및 효과적인 의사 소통에 어려움을 야기하기 때문에, 기업지배구조의 외국인 비중의 긍정적인 영향은 감소되어 결국 역 U자형 관계를 보여준다. 이러한 분석 결과는 학문적, 실무적 측면에서 기업지배구조의 기 존 연구들뿐만 아니라 향후 연구에도 중요한 시사점을 제공하여 준다.

The governance structure of corporate is very important to raise the nation's economic efficiency and the operation result of firm. However, the innovation of corporate governance structure is a important problem to improve international confidence in our country, since most large corporate in our country has a promodern governance structure to be influenced in decision making of corporate group by minority governance-shareholder. Therefore, in our country the improvement of corporate governance structure is very urgent. This study examine the improvement device of corporate governance structure to be introduced in our country, and present the improvement direction to be suitable to our country's economic circumstance.

The research objective examines the effect of corporate governance on capital structure and its effect on liquidity policy and corporate performance. It tests the effect of capital structure and liquidity policy on corporate governance. It also examines the effect of liquidity policy on capital structure and the effect of capital structure on liquidity policy. The study population is all manufacturing companies that went public on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2010-2019. The research population is 182 manufacturing companies. The Judgment Sampling was used and 109 companies meet the research criteria. The study used panel data for ten years so that the amount of data observed was 1090 observations. The analysis tool uses Warp Partial Least Square (WarpPLS). The results showed that corporate governance had a significant positive effect on capital structure, but corporate governance had a significant adverse effect on liquidity policy, and corporate governance had a significant positive effect on corporate performance. Furthermore, capital structure has a significant negative effect on corporate performance, but liquidity policy has no significant effect on corporate performance. Capital structure and liquidity policy are proven to be reciprocally significant positive correlations for manufacturing companies in Indonesia.

This study examines the impact of corporate governance on capital structure decisions based on a large panel of Chinese listed firms. Using the system Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimator to control for unobserved heterogeneity, endogeneity, and persistency in capital structure decisions, we document that the ownership structure plays a significant role in determining leverage ratios. More specially, we find that managerial ownership has a positive and significant impact on firms’ leverage, consistent with the incentive alignment hypothesis. We also find that managerial ownership only affects the leverage decisions of private firms in the post-2005 split share reform period. State ownership negatively influence leverage decisions implying that SOEs may face fewer restrictions in equity issuance and may receive favourable treatments when applying for seasoned equity 􀂿nancing, thus use less debt. Furthermore, our results show that while foreign ownership negatively influences leverage decisions, legal person shareholding positively influences firms’ leverage decisions only for state controlled firms. We also find that the board structure variables (board size and the proportion of independent directors) do not influence firms’ capital structure decisions. Our findings suggest that recent ownership reforms have been successful in terms of providing incentive to managers through managerial shareholdings to take risky financial choices.