본 연구는 지역의 자원을 발굴하고 지역주민의 삶의 질을 제고시키는 지역사회서비 스투자사업의 특성상 사업의 접근방식, 지역자원 발굴과정에 따라 사업의 진행양상이 전혀 다르게 나타날 수 있다는 것을 염두에 두고 새로운 지역발전의 전략으로서의 단서를 탐색하는 것을 목적으로 하고 있다. 이를 위해 “지역사회서비스투자사업”의 개발과정 및 포괄보조내 우선순위 선정과정이 이용자와 지역사회 변화를 통해 도시환경을 개선하였는가에 주목하고, 지역사회서비스투자사업을 추진 중인 낙후지역을 선정하여 사례 연구를 진행하였다. 이를 통해 지역사회서비스투자사업이 내생적 지역개발 수단으로 작용하기 위해서는 서비스 발굴 및 기획단계에서 지역주민의 욕구를 반영하는 것이 중 요함을 알 수 있었다. 이러한 점에서 강원도 지역자율형사회서비스투자사업의 성공적인 추진을 위해서는 단체장의 관심이 매우 중요하고, 차별화된 지역 특성을 고려한 다양한 사업을 적극적으로 발굴·기획하는 노력이 필요하다. 향후 지역사회서비스투자사업이 활 성화되어 사회서비스 제공과 지역의 개발이 동반성장하길 기대한다.

The countries of Northeast Asia have close ties and wide range of links in politics, economy, culture and geography. These countries have abroad humanistic foundation. It is of great significance to strengthen the regional cooperation in Northeast Asia under the vision of building the community of a shared future for mankind. This is conducive to safeguarding peace and stability in Northeast Asia, safe guarding the overall interests of Northeast Asia, promoting the common development of Northeast Asia, and realizing the “the Beltand Road” initiative. The idea of building the community of a shared future for mankind opensa new way of thinking for regional cooperation in Northeast Asia: focus in gon strengthening economic cooperation an destablishing cooperation mechanisms; strengthening mutual trust of political security and maintaining regional peace and stability; dealing with non-traditional security issues and curbing extremism; building a common concept and deepening regional identity. Therefore, building the community of a shared future for mankind and promoting regional cooperation in Northeast Asia can realize the overall realization of regional integration in Northeast Asia.

The purpose of this study was to develop survey tools for diagnosis of capacity levels in business promotion of rural residents when performing a rural development project of a regional unit. The cases of previous studies were analyzed to select community capacity indicators related to a rural development project. Five indicators were derived : social capital, consciousness of participation, community spirit, and leadership. Based on the five indicators, measurement items of various capacities were selected and 54 survey items were selected through evaluation of experts twice. The pilot tests were conducted and targeted at Jeonnam song ho-jung village and Gyeongnam Haegeumgang village to identify derived survey items. In addition, descriptive statistic analysis and reliability analysis were conducted. As a result, survey items were corrected by reducing 10 items of the total 54 items. This results showed that using this tool could help us understand capacity levels of rural residents.