본 연구는 농촌 활성화를 위한 국가 지원 사업 중 농촌 마을 종합 개발 사업을 대상으로 하였다. 기본계획 수립을 통해 실행되고 있는 권역의 사업내용에 대한 지역별, 연도별 분류를 통해 사업 내용을 분석함으로써 진행된 사업의 내용 및 자원현황을 파악하고 사업내용에 따른 어메니티 자원 활용 정도에 대한 연구를 실시하였다. 농촌마을종합개발사업의 어메니티 자원 활용도 분석을 위하여 7년간(2005~2011) 229개 권역의 사업특성과 자원현황에 대한 내용분석(Contents Analysis)을 실시하였다. 전체 사업은 Excel로 권역명과 사업유형, 세부사업 등 229개 권역의 전수조사를 통해 코딩하는 과정을 거쳤다. 이러한 과정을 거쳐 7개년도의 사업내용과 지역별 사업내용 등 보다 세부적인 분류를 시도하였다. 연구 결과, 전체적인 권역의 시설물자원이 가장 많이 활용되고 있지만 전체적으로 환경관리와 관련된 자원의 활용도는 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 연도별 사업을 통한 어메니티 자원 활용에 대한 변화 추이를 살펴보면 환경관리 자원, 동식물 자원, 수자원을 활용한 사업은 지속적으로 감소하고 있는 것으로 나타나고 있었다. 지역별 사업을 통한 어메니티 자원 활용에 대한 변화 추이를 살펴보면 전라북도와 경상북도에서 가장 높은 비율을 나타내고 있었다. 이러한 결과를 통해 특정한 자원에 집중되어 활용되고 있는 어메니티 자원에 대한 다양한 활용의 필요성이 나타나고 있었고 특히 농촌의 지속가능한 개발을 위한 환경관리에 대한 자원 활용이 요구되어야 한다는 것을 알 수 있었다.

To analyze main factors of size planning of community facilities that were created as part of development of a rural area, the present condition of factors deciding size of community facilities was analyzed, factors that influence size planning by the type of community facility were drawn with Delphi anaysis. The results of analyzing the present condition of size planning factors of community facilities show that facilities have been generally planned as multi-purpose and multi-functional facilities. And on the basis of the purpose of facilities, their functions and organization, and their operation programs, facilities are classified into community-centered, agritourism-centered, and combined ones. Using Delphi analysis, major factors that could affect size planning of community facilities were drawn on 26 community-centered, 28 agritourism-centered, and 30 combined. And the factors tended not to be applied well for size planning of community facilities.

The purpose of this study was to develop survey tools for diagnosis of capacity levels in business promotion of rural residents when performing a rural development project of a regional unit. The cases of previous studies were analyzed to select community capacity indicators related to a rural development project. Five indicators were derived : social capital, consciousness of participation, community spirit, and leadership. Based on the five indicators, measurement items of various capacities were selected and 54 survey items were selected through evaluation of experts twice. The pilot tests were conducted and targeted at Jeonnam song ho-jung village and Gyeongnam Haegeumgang village to identify derived survey items. In addition, descriptive statistic analysis and reliability analysis were conducted. As a result, survey items were corrected by reducing 10 items of the total 54 items. This results showed that using this tool could help us understand capacity levels of rural residents.

The purpose of this study is to examine the aspects and the characteristics of conflict among people in agricultural villages shown in the course of conducting a rural community development project, and to suggest a theoretical basis for the solution of the conflict. various theories on rural community development projects and conflict, and relevant sociopsychological theories were perused to lay a theoretical foundation for the study, and 5 actual cases of conflicts in agricultural experience villages were analyzed in the light of the grounded theory which is one of suitable methods of qualitative research. And comparative and comprehensive analysis of conflicts of different farm villages was done. Based on the result of analysis of conflict among residents on agricultural experience village, this paper suggests some ways for solution of the conflict.