This study investigates how process drama, with a special focus on the teacher-in-role strategy, brings about change in an L2 teacher’s practice. As a reflective practitioner researcher, the teacher who aims to integrate drama into L2 classrooms investigates how her practice changes during the planning phase of her workshops by analyzing her reflective journals through thematic analysis, interpreting the analysis findings and relating them to data collected through observations and interviews. Both cases of teacher-in-role used within the conventional teacher frame and that used beyond the frame were present. In the former case, teacher-in-role resulted in making a teacher-centered pre-scripted performance. However, in the latter case, the teacher being in role created a drama world where the improvisational and spontaneous side of teacher-in-role was developed, resulting in changing the teacher’s practice as follows: First, the teacher-in-role strategy encouraged the teacher to find ways to enhance learners’ commitment to the drama experience by engaging them in improvisation. Second, adopting the strategy led the teacher to exercise imagination, being sensitive to learners’ responses. Lastly, the teacher taking on a role made the teacher think of ways to provide L2 support that promotes the process of co-constructing the drama world.

This study examines what role English writing instructors need to play in peer revision activities. Students participating in the study were asked to go through multiple draft writing process in which they wrote three drafts on each writing assignment and review their peers’ essays in both a written comment sheet and an oral discussion. Overall, the results show that the peer comments played little role in improving the students’ essays from the first to second drafts. However, great improvement is observed from the second to final drafts. Specifically, little effect of the feedback on the improvement of non-linguistic features of the essays is identified. Regarding the linguistic features, improvement was made from the second to final drafts. However, it is achieved by both the peer and teacher comments. Therefore, it is concluded in the study that the teacher comments played a role in helping the students produce the linguistically improved final drafts. The study recommends the instructor’s explicit, detailed feedback to the errors caused from students’ insufficient writing and English competence.

본 연구의 목적은 유아교사의 성역할 정체감 유형에 따른 교사효능감과 행복감에 어떠한 차이를 나타내는지 살펴보고자 하였다. 연구대상은 서울특별시, 인천광역시, 경기지역의 유치원과 어린이집에서 근무하고 있는 유아교사 372명을 대상으로 하였다. 연구도구로는 한국형 성역할검사, 교사효능감 검사도구, 행복감 척도를 사용하였고, 수집된 연구자료는 SPSS 22.0 프로그램의 기술통계, 일원배치 분산분석(one way ANOVA)를 사용하여 분석하였다. 유아교사의 성역할 정체감 유형에 따라 교사효능감과 행복감의 수준에 차이가 있는를 살펴본 결과, 유아교사의 교사효능감 수준은 성역할 정체감 유형에 따라 유의한 차이를 나타냈으며 양성성 유형의 성역할 정체감을 가진 유아교사가 남성성유형이나 미분화 유형에 속하는 교사보다 교사효능감이 높았다. 또한, 유아교사의 행복감 수준도 마찬가지로 양성성 유형에 속하는 유아교사가 다른 성역할 정체감 유형의 유아교사보다 행복감이 높은 것으로 나타났다.