논문 상세보기

스포츠심리상담사 자격연수 평가와 발전을 위한 구상 KCI 등재

An Analysis on The Trainees' Evaluation of 2005 Sport Psychology Counseling Qualification Training Program

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/358287
서비스가 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.
한국스포츠심리학회지 (Korean Society of Sport Psychology (KJSP))
한국스포츠심리학회 (Korean Society Of Sport Psychology)
초록

한국스포츠심리학회는 2004년부터 스포츠심리상담사 자격제도를 시행해 오고 있다. 시행 첫해에 1급과 2급 스포츠심리상담사를 배출하였고 2005년도에는 처음으로 3급 연수를 실시하였다. 본 연구의 목적은 3급 자격연수에 참가한 연수생으로부터 연수에 관한 다양한 응답내용을 분석하여 그 결과를 제시하고 이를 바탕으로 자격제도의 안정적 도입에 필요한 제반 사항을 기술하는데 있다. 연수에 참가한 총인원은 70명(3급 58명, 1, 2급 12명)이었으며 이들의 과정은 같은 기간에 둘로 나누어 별도로 진행되었다. 이들에게는 연수과정 종료 직후에 연수 참가동기, 도움이 된 과목, 개선 요구사항, 향후 자격연수 참가여부, 관심분야, 활용계획 및 평가점수를 묻는 질문지가 배포되었고 응답 직후 이 자료를 수거하였다. 분석결과 가장 큰 참가이유는 스포츠상담에 대한 전문성 제고였고, 가장 도움이 많이 된 과목은 상담이론 및 실습인 것으로 밝혀졌다. 개선사항에는 연수형태, 수업형태, 숙박문제 등이 포함되었다. 응답자의 76%는 향후 상위 급수의 연수에 도전할 예정이며, 64%가 일반인들의 건강증진과 관련된 상황에서 상담을 하려는 의도를 갖고 있었다. 대다수의 연수생은 연수에서 배운 내용을 곧바로 현장에 활용하려는 계획을 가지고 있었고, 연수과정 전체에 대해서는 100점 만점에 85점으로 평가하였다. 이 결과를 바탕으로 향후 발전을 위한 구상을 제시하였다.

Korean Society of Sport Psychology(KSSP) has established sport psychology counseling qualification training program since 2004. It produced a number of 1st and 2nd degree sport psychology counselors in the first year(i.e., 2004). This year, 2005, it carried 3rd degree sport psychology qualification training program into effect for the first time. The purposes of this study were; 1) to analyze the contents of various responses on the sport psychology counseling qualification training program from the attendants and report the results; and 2) to describe and suggest general elements necessary to have stable establishment for this program. Fifty eight trainees participated in the 3rd degree qualification program, while twelve trainees did for the 1st/2nd degree qualification program, respectively. The program for the 1st/2nd degree and for the 3rd degree had been operated separately and their data were collected separately as well. A questionnaire was administered to the trainees right after the final class was over and the data were collected from them. The questionnaire included such questions as 'the reasons of your participation,' 'pick three classes you think most helpful,' 'things to be improved,' 'whether or not you want to take 1st or 2nd degree qualification program in the future,' 'interested area to counsel,' 'if you want to apply these knowledges you gained in this seminar to the field, then for whom and/or to where?' and 'your score to evaluate this program.' Results showed that the most influential reason to take part in the program was to enhance their specialty on sport psychology counseling. Resultantly, they picked 'counseling theory and practice' as 'the most helpful subject to enhance my specialty.' Lodging, class running styles, and program styles were included among 'the things to be improved in the program.' About 76% of them intended to challenge to the upper qualification program, and 64% was interested in the counseling in the exercise setting associated with health promotion situations. Most trainees had a plan to apply the knowledge learned from this program to his/her own areas immediately after the program was over. They gave 85 points out of 100 as they evaluated this program in general. A road map for further development was suggested based upon the results mentioned above.

저자
  • 한명우(선문대) | Myung Woo Han
  • 김병준(인하대) | Byung Joon Kim
  • 허정훈(중앙대) | Jung Hoon Huh
  • 류호상(영남대) | Ho Sang Ryu
  • 홍길동(서울대) | Gil Dong Hong
  • 송우엽(성균관대) | Woo Yeob Song
  • 박진훈(고려대) | Jin Hoon Park
  • 육동원(연세대) | Dong Won Yook
  • 장덕선(체과원) | Duk Sun Chang
  • 정용각(부산외대) | Yong Gak Jung
  • 박진성(순천대) | Jin Sung Park