The purpose of this study is to measure the cost-benefit of a road construction project in Vietnam through international development cooperation, which includes private grants and Official Development Assistance(ODA). In developing countries, it is difficult and costly to use data on markets, the CVM(Contingent Valuation Method) to measure the WTP(Willingness-to-Pay) as the benefits of road construction are used. A total of 232 villagers in 16 villages of Lao Cai Province in Northern Vietnam have been surveyed. It is found that the Benefit-Cost Ratio(B/C) in all 3 models are found to be well over 1.0, ranging from 2.8 to 3.64 with the discount rate of 0.06. These BC ratios imply the road construction project in Lao Cai can be justified. Also, it is found that the shortened travel time is the most relevant factor for WTP among direct benefits and the enhanced academic achievement of the children is the most relevant factor among indirect benefits, due to easier and faster access to schools, which in turn increase the school attendance rate. The result of this study can be used to justify other similar projects in Vietnam, even though the benefits may have to be reassessed in other countries.

The objective of this paper is to apply choice experiment methods to estimate non-market value of organic farming and its policy implication. A preliminary survey shows that the attributes of organic farming are reduce environmental pollution, bio-diversity improvements, cultural diversity improvements and maintain local community, reduce green-house gas emissions, energy saving, landscape improvements and tax for organic farming improvement policy. Questionnaire was eight different choice sets presented to each respondent. Implicit values of the attributive levels of organic farming have been calculated into tax money costs per house. This paper compared the six feasible scenarios in terms of willingness to pay per year. This study is expected to contribute to government’s organic farming policies and quantitative information related to practice of organic farming.

This paper was to use choice experiments in the analysis of consumer choice behavior and preferences for five different attributes(the origin of rice, a quality certificate, a quality control, a traceability system, the price of rice) in Cheongju City. Completed surveys yielded 712 responses which were analyzed using the conditional logit model to analyze the marginal willingness to pay of the four attributes(the origin of rice, a quality certificate, a quality control and a traceability system) per household and estimated the marginal willingness to pay of the set of feasible options. The result of this study can be used as a guide for the rice industry in the design of possible labeling schemes.

본 연구는 조건부가치평가법 중 이중양분선택형 질문을 사용하여 안양천 유역의 수질개선에 대한 지불의사를 추정하였다. 선형로짓모형에서 전체 응답자의 지불의사액은 4,930원이었으며 서울지역 거주민과 경기지역 거주민의 차이는 없는 것으로 추정되었다. 응답자들은 전반적으로 조건부 시장을 잘 받아들였으며 가구당 월평균 3,860원에서 5,101원의 지불의사를 가지고 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 이 값을 전체지역으로 확장하면 연간 약 83.0억원에서 109.7억원에

본 연구는 안양천 유역의 물순환 건전화를 위한 최종 대안을 제시하기 위해 비용효과분석을 수행하였다. 이중 편익산정은 진술선호기법 중 하나인 실험선택법(Choice Experiments, CE)과 대안의 평가지수(Alternative Evaluation Index, AEI)를 결합하여 수행하였다. 실험선택법은 지역별로 다양한 속성을 보이는 안양천 유역을 잠재적 위험도와 지리적 특성을 바탕으로 6개 지역으로 나누어 설문과 분석을 수행하였다. NB > 0 이

최근 유역과 하천개발사업에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다. 이러한 배경하에서 본 논문은 실험선택법(choice experiment)을 적용하여 안양천의 속성별 가치를 추정하고 추정된 가치를 적용하여 안양천 물순환 건전화를 위한 대안의 경제적 가치를 추정하였다. 실험선택법은 여러 속성으로 구성된 환경재의 가치추정방법으로 응답자의 선호체계에 명확하게 초점을 둔 지불의사 유도방법이다. 예비조사를 통해 안양천이 가진 속성을 홍수피해위험, 유지유량, 수질, 하천형태