The honey bee soluble acetylcholinesterase 1 (AmAChE1) is overexpressed under the overwintering and brood rearing-suppressed conditions. To investigate the role of AmAChE1 in regulating acetylcholine (ACh) titer, ACh concentrations in both the head (central nervous system) and abdomen (peripheral nervous system) were analyzed. ACh titer was significantly lower in both tissues of worker bees under the overwintering and brood rearing-suppressed conditions compared to control bees. Interestingly, the expression levels of choline acetyltransferase (AmChAT) and molecular marker genes of immune systems were significantly reduced in honey bee head under the same conditions. Taken together, ACh titer appears to be reduced via a cooperative interaction of the AmAChE1 overexpression and AmChAT underexpression and to be linked to reduced inmmune responses under the overwintering and brood rearing-suppressed conditions. The roles of AmAChE1 (with little catalytic activity) and AmChAT in the ACh homeostasis and signaling was discussed in the contexts of immune response and longevity regulation in honey bees.

Among two different acetylcholinesterase (AmAChE1 and AmAChE2) of the western honey bee, the soluble AmAChE1might be related with a stress response as judged from its over-expression in honey bee workers when brood rearingwas suppressed. In this study, to ensure the nature of AmAChE1 responding to stress factors, the expression patternsof AmAChE1 were investigated following various treatments, including varroa mite infestation, bacterial challenge, broodrearing suppression, thermal stresses, chemical treatments, ultraviolet B irradiation, starvation, water restriction and crowdingstress. In addition, transcription profiles of four heat shock protein genes known as general stress markers and vitellogeningene, which is induced in several stress conditions, were tested as positive references. In every tested condition, onlybrood rearing suppression and heat shock were related with the expression of AmAChE1.

There are two different types of acetylcholinesterase (AChE1 and AChE2) in the western honeybee as in most of insects. It is suggested that soluble AmAChE1 might be related with a stress response as judged from its elevated expression level in honey bee workers when brood rearing was suppressed. In this study, to ensure the nature of AmAChE1 responding to stress factors, the expression patterns of AmAChE1 following heat shock, brood rearing suppression and chemical treatments (Imidacloprid and fluvalinate) were investigated. Also, several heat shock protein (hsp) genes (hsp10, hsp60, hsp70 and hsp90) known as general stress markers were tested as positive references. Heat shock induced expression of every tested hsp along with AmAChE1. In brood rearing-suppressed worker bees, 7 days old bees showed much higher expression level of AmAChE1 and hsp90 compared to control honey bees. However, treatment of imidacloprid and fluvalinate did not induce any apparent overexpression of these genes. These results confirm that both HSP and AmAChE1 genes generally respond to temperature and brood rearing suppression and further suggest that AmAChE1 can serve as a potential biomarker along with hsps for the detection of stress in honey bee colonies.

Acetylcholinesterase 1 (AmAChE1) has low catalytic activity and is abundantly expressed in both neuronal and non-neuronal tissues. In previous experiments, we observed that AmAChE1 is rarely expressed in summer while highly expressed in winter. Through additional experiments, the expression of AmAChE1 was suggested to be associated with brood rearing status. Under the assumption that abnormal suppression of brood rearing activity may result in stressful condition in honey bee social community, it was further suggested that AmAChE1 is likely involved in stress management particularly during winter. We hypothesized that the increased docility usually observed in overwintering bees is likely an outcome of stress management in colony, which is mediated by AmAChE1 expression. To verify this, worker bees expressing abundant AmAChE1 were collected in early winter and injected with Amace1 dsRNA to knockdown Amace1. Then, the behavioral activity of the bees was investigated using the EthoVison video tracking system. Honey bees injected with Amace1 dsRNA showed significantly increased motility, which was strongly correlated with the suppressed expression level of AmAChE1 in the abdomen. No apparent reduced expression of AmAChE1 in the head was observed perhaps due to the limited efficacy of RNA interference in the blood-brain-barrier. Our finding suggests that behavioral activity can be regulated, at least, by AmAChE1 expression level in non-neuronal tissue (i.e., fatbody) perhaps via metabolic alteration.

Human body and head lice are obligatory human ectoparasites. Although both body and head lice belong to a single species, Pediculus humanus, only body lice are known to be a vector of several bacterial diseases. The higher vector competence of body lice is assumed to be due to their weaker immune response than that of head lice. To test this hypothesis, immune reactions were compared between body and head lice following infections by two model bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, and a human pathogen, Bartonella quintana. Following dermal or oral challenge, the number of these bacteria increased both in hemocoel and alimentary tract of body lice but not in head lice and the viability of the B. quintana was significantly higher in body louse feces, the major route of infection to human. In addition, body lice showed the lower basal/induced transcription level of major immune genes, cytotoxic reactive oxygen species and phagocytosis activity compared with head lice. These findings suggest that a reduced immune response may be responsible, in part, for the increased proliferation and excretion of viable bacteria which are associated with the high level of human infectivity seen in body versus head lice.

Recently, the expression of acetylcholinesterase1 (AChE1) in honeybee worker has been found to be seasonally fluctuated. Seasonal investigation on the AChE1 expression profiles revealed that it is abundantly expressed in January but its expression was completely abolished in February in both head and abdomen. In an attempt to predict the physiological function of seasonally expressed AChE1, proteomic analysis of honeybee worker was conducted using the samples collected in January and February. Total protein samples separately extracted from the head and abdomen of honeybee forager were compared by 2-D electrophoresis (2-DE). More than 2-fold differences in expression patterns between the two different samples were observed in 50 and 85 protein spots in the head and abdomen, respectively. Among them, 20 protein spots showing >17-fold differences in expression between the two different samples of the head were identified by mass spectrometry. Most of the proteins were identified to be the major royal jelly protein (MRJP) families (e.g., MRJP, MRJP2 and MRJP3), which are known to be expressed in nurse bees during brooding season, and their expression was significantly higher in January than in February. This result was unexpected because brooding usually began in the study site apiary during February and the worker bees used for analysis were assumed to be foragers (old workers). Thus, current findings suggest, though speculative, that the workers collected in January may function as nurses despite their old ages in January or that MRJPs may have other not-yet-characterized functions, which is apart from the conventionally known roles. Finally, possible association of MRJPs with AChE1 was discussed.

An easy and rapid resistance detection protocol for the Western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis was established based on the residual contact vial bioassay (RCV), in which insecticide resistance levels can be estimated at 8 h-post treatment of diagnostic doses. The RDA strain was used as a reference susceptible strain, which has been reared under laboratory conditions over 10 years without exposure to any insecticides. Seven insecticides were tested for the determination of diagnostic dose. Among them, five insecticides (chlorfenapyr, acrinathrin, spinosad, emmamectin benzoate and thiamethoxam, ranged as 0.03 ~ 0.42 μg-1cm2) were applicable to the RCV. However, two insecticides (omethoate and imidacloprid) were not able to be used for the RCV because the treated inner surface of glass vials by these insecticides were too viscous, causing non-specific mortality. The RCV detection kit was employed for the estimation of resistance levels for the five insecticides in five local populations. Almost field-collected populations revealed high levels of resistance to the four insecticides (acrinathrin, spinosad, emmamectin benzoate and thiamethoxam) by showing less than 50% mortality. The baseline resistance detection by RCV method will facilitate the selection of proper insecticides for farmers to manage insecticide resistant-populations of F. occidentalis.