This study was undertaken to investigate intake and consumption behavior of dairy products in college students in order to identify a better way to increase milk consumption. This survey was carried out through questionnaires. The subjects were 307 college students in ChungJu. A total of 98.3% students thought milk as good for health but only 21.5% of them drank it everyday. Most students reported drinking milk two to three times a week. Male students reported drinking milk for drinking, whereas females students for nutrition. College students preferred flavored milk rather than plain milk. Students preferred the drink-type yogurt among the dairy products. The major reason for drinking fermented milk was taste. After drinking the fermented milk, 39.1% of female students thought that fermented milk could prevent constipation. Most students thought that better taste and quality of milk and milk product would increase their consumption.

최근 현대인의 소비트렌드는 대량생산제품 보다는 소비자 개인의 개성과 취향을 중시한다는데 주장이 있어 왔다. 수공예 제품 소비자의 저변확대를 기대할 수 있었다. 그러나 최근 저성장이 장기화되고, 소비자의 구매성향이 변화하면서 소비자의 구매동기가 중요하게 되었다. 통계청에 따르면, 1인 가구의 비중은 계속 증가 추세가 더욱 가속화 될 것으로 전망하고 있다. 소비자는 여러 사회적, 경제적 요인이 복잡하게 작용하고 있다. 즉, 고령화, 여가활동의 증가 등의 다양한 배경이 있다. 본 연구에서는 시대적 변화흐름에 따른 소비자와 새로운 소비시장이 달라지는데 대비해야 한다. 도자기 소비자의 구매 동기를 명확하게 제시하고 구매성향을 도출하고자 여주도자기축제장을 방문한 도자기 구매 경험이 있는 소비자를 중심으로 살펴보았다. 최근 구매한 경험이 있는지를 중요한 제한 조건으로 하여 설문조사를 진행하였다. 본 논문의 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 주로 생활자기 53.5%, 커피잔/다기류 27.5% 등의 순으로 구매하였으며, 국내제품 48.3%, 수공예작가의 작품을 46.8%로 구매하였다. 국내 도자산업 시장은 생활자기 관련 대기업의 몰락으로 위기감이 가중 되고 있다. 이러한 원인은 해외 도자제품에 비해 국내 도자제품은 가격 경쟁력이 낮고 변화한 구매동기에 대응하는 것이다. 1인 가구 및 고령화로 인한 노인 단독가구 등 다변화된 가구 유형의 사회적 변화와 요구를 적극적으로 반영하여 기획된 상품 개발이 필요한 시점이다.

Purpose - When indulging in hedonic items is construed as wasteful and evokes anticipated regret or guilt, consumers are more likely to seek reasons to justify their indulgence. Justification requirement for spending on indulgences over necessities could lead to the places of their finding the ways that mitigate the anticipated regret and guilt. However the previous research focusing on consumers’ own great effort leading to positive outcomes has not given much attention to other’s outcomes induced from his or her little or no efforts, by which consumers could feel envy. The guilt associated with consumers’ indulgence could vary according to envy type felt according to their evaluation about other’s outcomes and their self construal level. Current research explored the envy type’s effects on consumers’ spending on hedonic products, and moderation effects of self construal level on the envy type’s effects. Research design, data, and methodology – 2(envy type: benign versus malicious) × 2(self construal level: high versus low) between-subjects design was employed. Data for empirical analysis were from 173 undergraduate participants. ANOVA was used to verify hypotheses. Results – The tendency of choosing utilitarian product versus hedonic product was moderated by the envy type. The participants who felt benign envy were more likely to choose utilitarian product versus hedonic product than those who felt malicious envy were. And the tendency of benign envy-felt participants’ choosing hedonic versus utilitarian product was more weakened to those with lower-level self construal than to those with higher-level self construal. However the tendency of malicious envy-felt participants’ choosing hedonic versus utilitarian product was not moderated by the self construal level. Conclusions – This research could advance the theory related to indulgent hedonic consumption by exploring the effects of self construal level and envy type on hedonic indulgence. In view of the results from current study, marketers should make efforts of communicating and selling utilitarian products to persuade consumers with lower-level construal when they feel benign envy to others. And they should conduct marketing acts for hedonic products to persuade consumers when they feel malicious envy to others.