우리나라의 폐기물 정책 및 처리방법이 변화됨에 따라 매립지로 반입되는 폐기물들의 유기물함량이 점차 줄어들고 있으며, 매립장내 수분이 낮아져 매립지가 안정화되는데 오랜 시간이 소요되고 있다. 이러한 추세에 따라 매립장의 조기 안정화를 위하여 최근 국내에서는 매립지내 침출수 재순환에 관한 법제화가 이뤄졌다. 한편, 하수슬러지를 고형연료로 생산하기 위하여 수열탄화(Hydrothermal carbonization)공정을 도입시, 해당 공정에서 배출되는 고액분리된 액체생성물 발생량은 투입폐기물량의 80% 정도로 반드시 적정처리 또는 재활용이 필요하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 매립장의 조기안정화를 목표로 수열탄화액이 매립장 순환수로써 활용가능한지를 파악하기 위하여 수도권매립지로 반입되는 폐기물 조성을 반영한 폐기물과 수열탄화액 등을 serum bottle에 넣고 35℃ 항온 및 혐기적 조건에서 지속적으로 가스발생량 및 가스 조성을 측정하였다. 실험 결과, 수열탄화 반응후 고액분리된 액체생성물은 기존의 침출수 주입효과와 비교할 때 보다 우수한 메탄가스 발생경향을 확인할 수 있었다. 그러나 암모니아 탈기 후의 수열탄화액은 탈기과정에서 투입된 Na+의 영향으로 순환수를 투입하지 않은 경우보다도 낮은 바이오가스 및 메탄가스 발생량 등을 나타내 폐기물 분해에 긍정적인 영향을 주지 못하는 것으로 평가되었다.

In this study, freezing and thawing test of secondary product was performed using the Fiber Reinforced polymer Cement composites. From the test result, it was found that fiber reinforced polymer cement composites resistance of freezing and thawing were better than that of conventional products.

Industrial by-products in combination with FA, BS was excellent compressive strength, chloride penetration resistance by OPC 60(W/C 60%) based on the comparative analysis. The most effective periods were BS 28 days and FA 56 days.

Prediction method for the long-term chemical leaching amount from by-product/recycled materials such as waste concrete and steel slag and so on is necessary to widely promote their effective utilization and evaluate their environmental safety. Although there are the batch leaching tests and the column leaching test as the testing methods for evaluating the long-term leaching behavior, the leaching mechanism and the testing result compatibility in both tests has insufficiently been clarified yet. Thus, the prediction of the leaching behavior from the by-product/recycled materials used in actual civil works and their environmental safety evaluation are by no means certain. This paper shows the difference between the batch leaching tests and the column leaching tests in the chemical leaching behavior of Cu-slag. The batch leaching tests were conducted under liquid/solid ratio = 10, liquid = distilled water, stirring strength = 0, 30, or 120 rpm. After a certain elapsed time, the leaching solution was exchanged with the pure distilled water and then the stirring was restarted. The elapsed time was set at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 days. The column leaching tests were also conducted under the same conditions as those of the batch leaching tests in order to evaluate the effects of the pore distribution and the pore flow velocity in the Cu-slag column on the leaching behavior. In the column leaching tests, the effluent passing through the column was circulated as the influent (Fig. 1). The leaching duration in the column tests can be equivalent as that in the batch tests, so that the difference in the leaching behavior between the batch leaching tests and the column leaching tests may be dependent on the pore-scale heterogeneous flow and path generated in porous materials. Figure 2 shows the leaching rate evaluated from the batch leaching tests and the column leaching tests. In the same fluid velocity levels, the leaching rate in the column tests was larger than that in the batch tests. The leaching rate has been considered large with the fluid velocity. Although the fluid velocity generated by the stirring was the same as the flushing velocity on the surface of the Cu-slag in the batch tests, the fluid velocity in the column tests was enhanced because the permeant liquid was concentrated into the limited pore space in the Cu-slag column. Thus, the pore-scale heterogeneous flow and path generated in porous materials should be evaluated in order to clarify the compatibility between the batch leaching tests and the column leaching tests.