지도 제작에 대한 공간 사상의 선택, 정의, 표현 등과 관련된 일련의 도식화된 규정을 의미하는 지도도식규정은 시간이 지남에 따라 빠르게 변화하는 사회의 실정을 제대로 반영하지 못하는 경향이 있다. 또한 국토의 중요성과 국가 지도의 효용성에 대한 인식이 점차 증대됨에 따라 국가 지도 제작에 중요한 지침이 되는 지도도식규정에 대한 보다 근본적이고 종합적인 수정‧보완 작업이 시급히 요구되고 있다. 이러한 필요성에 따라 본 연구에서는 기존의 지도도식규정을 재검토하고, 해외 주요 선진국의 지도도식규정을 현황을 분석하고, 지도학적 원리에 근거한 국가 지도도식규정의 종합적인 개선 방안을 마련하였다. 아울러 이를 지속적으로 유지관리하고 발전시키기 위한 장단기적 방안도 함께 제시하고 있다. 본 연구를 통한 성과물은 도식규정 자체의 변화뿐만 아니라, 사용자의 고려가 강화되고, 국가 지도 제작 과정 및 결과에 대한 제고를 가능케 할 것으로 기대된다. 또한 국가 지도 제작기관이나 관련 정책 입안자에 게 보다 실제적인 활용 가치를 가질 것으로 기대된다.

After it was reorganized as the rural center revitalization project recently, there is an opinion that the nature of the project was changed to solve long-time aspired projects of some districts unlike various projects according to the previous project purposes. Therefore, this study analyzes the current status of revitalization project plans and operation monitoring to make rural center villages, establishes plans that can be applied to the rural center village revitalization project and suggests the improvement plans for monitoring. With the necessity of connectivity with centrality analysis for long-term and sustainable growth of the rural center revitalization project, the analysis on the 8 districts' centrality analysis and the function of the master plan were compared and analyzed, but there is not enough interrelation. Regarding the consulting methods for weak districts to activate facility operation after the project is implemented, the field consulting performed by the collaboration of Gyeongsangnam-do government, Gyeongnam Rural Revitalization Support Center and Gyeongnam branch of Korea Rural Community Corporation shows 87.6% of satisfaction level, which indicates it is the most effective. Based on the above results, it is necessary to reinforce the methods on resident demand survey, dimension and the reflection process of the project when preliminary plans are established for effective implementation of the rural center village revitalization project. It is also necessary to revise relevant standards not to change preliminary plans excessively during the master plan establishment process, and to oblige preliminary investigation of experts. The joint monitoring and consulting systems of experts and local governments should be applied from the establishment stage of the master plan, so that it can be sustainable rural center village revitalization project.

The Guidelines for National Infrastructure Protection Plan, the proposed standards are based on common issues for the protection of the national infrastructure system and fail to provide the correct guidelines reflecting the characteristics of each sector. In addition, since the risk assessment procedures such as risk and impact analysis are conceptually presented, evaluation based on the characteristics of the facilities is insufficient, and in some agencies, it is performed perfunctorily. Therefore, this study analyzes the present state of the National Infrastructure Protection Plans and draws common problems, and suggests ways to improve the vulnerable parts in the Guidelines for National Infrastructure Protection Plan through the case studies of advanced foreign countries.