As social media becomes increasingly integrated into daily life, it has reshaped how people communicate and consume advertising. Instagram, a visually-oriented platform, uses advanced targeting and shopping features to deliver personalized advertising, particularly in the fashion retail sector. Grounded in the cognitive-affective-behavioral model and human information processing theory, this study investigates how Instagram’s personalized fashion advertising influences consumer perception and behavior, focusing on recommendation system quality (accuracy, novelty, diversity) and content quality (vividness, diagnosticity). A survey of 403 Korean adults aged 20–69 was conducted to assess causal relationships among these variables. The findings reveal that accuracy and diversity in recommendation systems, along with diagnosticity of content quality, positively influence user satisfaction, which, in turn, influences their click-through and purchase intentions. However, novelty and vividness exhibited no significant effects. Academically, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying personalized advertising on visuallyoriented platforms like Instagram. Practically, it underscores the importance of creating high-quality, personalized content that aligns with user preferences and provides clear product information. Brands can enhance user engagement by designing visually appealing advertisements and optimizing linked web pages to foster emotional bonds with consumers. These strategies can cultivate long-term customer relationships and enhance brand loyalty while maximizing advertising effectiveness on Instagram.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the post-purchase behavior of customers who experienced cognitive dissonance after exposure to a franchise foodservice advertisement. The study adopted cognitive dissonance theory to explain the dissonance resulting from the combination of advertisements and actual product that consumers received. In detail, the research hypothesized that cognitive dissonance will affect consumers’ post-purchase behavior as well as their efforts to reduce dissonance. Exactly 274 questionnaires were used in the analysis. The results showed that more than 80% of respondents were influenced by advertisements when purchasing menus, and 50% were unsatisfied when the provided menu “was not the same as the advertisement shown.” It was found that advertisement type did not significantly affect either group that experienced dissonance. In terms of satisfaction, however, the former group showed greater dissatisfaction when dissonance occurred (p<.001). Finally, there was a significant difference between the two groups regarding post-purchase behavior (p<.05). Customers with dissonance were likely to ‘express dissatisfaction directly to the store’, ‘leave negative reviews’, and ‘participate in negative word-of-mouth’. Thus, the results revealed that cognitive dissonance could significantly influence customer satisfaction and consequently lead to negative post-purchasing behaviors.