이 연구에서는 이슬점에 대한 중학생들의 개념 이해를 평가하기 위한 루브릭을 개발하였다. 이를 위해 국가 수준 학업성취도 평가의 다층 서답형 문항에 대한 중학생의 응답을 분석하였다. 학생들의 응답 특성에 따라 유형을 분류하고, 성취도 점수 평균에 따른 응답 유형의 분포를 분석하였다. 이를 토대로 이슬점 개념 이해를 평가하기 위한 루브릭을 작성하였다. 연구 결과 다음과 같다: 첫째, 포화수증기량 곡선에서 이슬점 찾기에 대한 학생 응답을 분석한 결과, 다수의 학생들이 이슬점에 대한 개념이 없거나 부족한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 이슬점에서 수증기 응결과정에 대한 학생 응답을 분석한 결과, 과학적 개념 유형의 비율은 매우 낮았으며, 오개념 유형의 비율이 상대적으로 높았으며 유형 또한 다양하였다. 셋째, 성취도 점수 평균에 따른 학생 응답 유형 분포 분석을 토대로 4수준의 평가 루브릭을 작성하였다. 이러한 연구 결과를 토대로 지구과학 분야에서 개념 이해 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발과 활용 측면에서 제언을 하였다.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to verify the effect of student-generated rubrics on learning motivation and academic achievement in simulation education. Methods: Student-generated rubrics was developed through the negotiation process between teacher and students, content validity has been verified. The participants were 122 undergraduate nursing students recruited from the one university in G city. The participants were given the simulation education for 15 weeks from 2011 to 2012. Experimental group were presented to student-generated rubrics before course starting was not presented to the control group. The data were analyzed by t-test with SPSS win 18.0 program. Results: Student-generated rubrics presented simulation education was to improve learning motivation and academic achievement. Conclusion: Student-generated rubrics with high reliability and validity in a number of areas to be developed and there is a need to be refined and ensure objectification of simulation education.

Purpose: The study was undertaken to evaluate the reliability and validity of hypoglycemia clinical judgment rubric which developed for investigation nursing student’s clinical judgement competency on hypoglycemia simulation practice. Methods: The study was a methodological study with 59 nursing students from Y University participating. Fifty video files were used to analyze nursing student’s clinical judgment competency. Rubric was consisted with 11 questions having 4 phases (beginning, developing, accomplished, and exemplary) and composed with 4 sub-categories (noticing, interpreting, responding and evaluation/reflecting). Results: The value of inter-rater reliability was r=.92 (p<.001) and Kendall tau b=.79 (p<.001). The value of intra-rater reliability was r=.92 (p<.001) and r=.99 (p<.001). Cronbach's α was .93 as internal consistency reliability. Construct validity by factor analysis, 3 factors were extracted and it explained 80.9% of the variance in clinical judgment competency. The value of competency of hypoglycemia clinical judgment was 2.47 (±.42). Conclusion: The hypoglycemia clinical judgment rubric can be used for assessing clinical judgment competency on simulation practice. Also, it can be applied for evaluation a clinical judgment as a nursing program outcome of nursing students.