This study identifies the commercialization success factors that can be an important indicator for the transfer and commercialization of national R&D results in the agricultural sector. Unlike other industries, the agricultural sector has a non-systematically scaled and processed industrial structure, and R&D is led by government rather than the private sector. Although the quantitative performance of national agricultural R&D, especially the number of patents and publications, has increased rapidly with the quantitative expansion of the government R&D budget, the technology commercialization of the results of agricultural R&D has been accompanied by difficulties for SMEs. Therefore, this study summarized the success factors for commercialization of state-owned technologies presented in previous studies, and based on them, analysed the success factors for commercialization specific to the agricultural sector. It also conducted a questionnaire survey using Delphi and focus group interviews (FGI) with experts from academia, research and industry, and a survey of agricultural companies to derive success factors for commercialization in the agricultural sector using logistic regression analysis. As a result, five indicators with positive correlation and three indicators with negative correlation within technology characteristics, suppliers, adopters, policy and market factors were finally derived as key factors for agricultural commercialization. In the future, it is expected that independent factor analysis of the food and seed sectors, which have independent industry characteristics from the agricultural sector, will be needed.

본 연구는 공공연구기관의 기술이전시 연구자가 이전기술의 사업화 과정에 참여 하여 이전된 기술의 발명 과정에서 습득한 노하우를 전수하는 것이 사업화 성공에 미치는 영향 을 분석하였다. ETRI(Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute)의 2014년 기술 이전 계약건중 설문조사에 응답한 204건을 분석대상으로 하였으며, 종속변수가 범주형 변수일 때 특정 사건의 발생(성공 또는 미성공) 가능성을 예측하는 통계기법인 로지스틱 회귀분석을 이용하였다. 실증분석 결과, 기술이전이후 사업화 지원의 강도가 이전된 기술의 사업화 성공 여부와 양의 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 공공연구기관중 최대 규모의 기술이 전 및 사업화지원 실적을 보유하고 있는 ETRI의 사례를 통한 실증분석 결과라는데 의의가 있으며, 이를 통해 정부 및 공공연구기관의 중소기업 지원 정책 방향에 대한 시사점을 제시한다.

우리나라 중소기업들은 기술개발에 대한 중요성을 인지하고 연구개발에 대한 투자를 지속적으로 증대시켜왔다. 그러나 이러한 노력에도 불구하고 중소기업들의 기술수준 및 사업화 역량은 정체 현상을 보이고 있는 실정이다. 또한 중소기업들은 연구개발 프로세스에 있어 기술기획과 사전조사에 많은 애로를 겪고 있는 것으로 조사되었다. 이에 본 연구에서는 중소기업들의 기술수준 답보상태를 낮은 기술기획 역량에서 기인하는 것으로 파악하고 기술기획 역량과 기술사업화 간의 성공요인을 분석하고자 하였다. 실증분석 결과, 기술사업화 성공을 위한 다양한 요인 가운데 협력파트너십과 시장지향성이 유의미한 영향을 미치는 변수인 것으로 나타났다. 기술기획 수립에 있어 내⋅외부 협력을 증대시키고 시장지향성이 강화될수록 기술사업화에 성공할 확률이 높은 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구에서는 실증분석의 방법으로 로지스틱 회귀분석을 사용하였다.

Purpose - To success, in spite of deficient resources, a start-up company has to check various circumstances. Many researchers proposed different appraisal methods for technology commercialization. But everybody agrees Merrifield is the first one, who is a pioneer of an appraisal model of technology commercialization. After he proposed it, many researchers and field workers developed a more complicated model, which called a BMO model. In this research, considering the circumstances of start-ups that lack available resources, it proposes a new appraisal method for technology commercialization, which is named a weighted-BMO model. Research design, data, and methology - For the new BMO-model, it studied the preceding studies. And it found that the success factors for start-ups were correlated with technology commercialization. After comparing the success factors for technology commercialization of start-ups with BMO appraisal factor, it withdraws the net BMO appraisal model: which we are calling the weighted-BMO model. Results – This study found a few things. First, actually, the BMO appraisal factors related with the success factors of technology commercialization. Second, the weighted-BMO model, which included the entrepreneur ability factor, was more accurately estimated the success of technology-based start-ups than the BMO model. Third, it overcame the weakness of the BMO-model, which did not include quantitative factors. In addition to evaluating the feasibility of the BMO model, we also presented a strategy for the future direction. But, still, it included a few shortcomings, which we are calling the arbitrage of weighted value. Sometimes, the intentional weighted value can deliberate the different valuation. Conclusitons - Due to this study, the weighted-BMO model included appraisal factors related with the success factors of technology commercialization and the entrepreneur ability factor, and quantitative factors. When evaluating the combined score of the existing Merrified BMO components, 35 points of the first pass criterion accounted for 29.17% of the total score, and 80 points of the merit score of the second rank criterion were 66.67% Considering that the weighted sum is taken into account, the baseline score of the weighted summing method for each component of the modified BMO model is 2.92 points, which is 29.17% of the weighted sum total of 10 points. The evaluation score was 6.67 points, 66.67% of the weighted total score of 10 points.