This study explores multiple variables of an OTT service for discovering hidden relationship between rating and the other variables of each successful and failed content, respectively. In order to extract key variables that are strongly correlated to the rating across the contents, this work analyzes 170 Netflix original dramas and 419 movies. These contents are classified as success and failure by using the rating site IMDb, respectively. The correlation between the contents, which are classified via rating, and variables such as violence, lewdness and running time are analyzed to determine whether a certain variable appears or not in each successful and failure content. This study employs a regression analysis to discover correlations across the variables as a main analysis method. Since the correlation between independent variables should be low, check multicollinearity and select the variable. Cook's distance is used to detect and remove outliers. To improve the accuracy of the model, a variable selection based on AIC(Akaike Information Criterion) is performed. Finally, the basic assumptions of regression analysis are identified by residual diagnosis and Dubin Watson test. According to the whole analysis process, it is concluded that the more director awards exist and the less immatatable tend to be successful in movies. On the contrary, lower fear tend to be failure in movies. In case of dramas, there are close correlations between failure dramas and lower violence, higher fear, higher drugs.

본 연구의 목적은 국내 레스토랑 이용객의 서비스 실패 후 감정변화에 영향을 미치는 실패 귀인 요소, 그리고 고객의 브랜드 관계 품질이 서비스 실패 귀인 지각에 대한 환원효과를 검증하는 것이다. 본 연구의 시사점으로는 귀인이론은 귀인이론과 귀인적 이론으로 구분할 수 있는데 한 모형에서 귀인이론에 영향을 미치는 개인 신념과 귀인 후의 감정반응 간의 영향관계를 통합적으로 측정하는 연구는 미미하다. 신념(BRQ: Brand Relationship Quality)-귀인-감정 3단계 모형을 구축하고 충돌 감정 반응(분노 VS동정)의 독립성을 같이 검증되었다. 먼저, 감성적BRQ(친밀감 및 사랑)은 통제가능성 귀인에 미치는 환원효과가 있는데 행동적BRQ(상호의존)은 통제가능성 귀인에 미치는 확대효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 관리적 관점에서 레스토랑 관리자는 고객의 서비스 실패의 반복 발생 가능성 지각을 낮추고 고객의 동정을 환기해야 한다. 통합적으로 레스토랑 관리자는 고객의 서비스 실패 귀인 지각을 잘 조절하고 고객의 BRQ이 감정반응에게의 영향효과를 환원시켜야 한다. 여러 가지의 서비스 회복 방안을 수립하고 귀 인을 잘 조절해야 한다. 뿐만 아니라, BRQ은 각각 분노 및 동정에 다른 효과(확대VS환충)가 있기 때문 에 고객 BRQ의 특성에 따라 다른 서비스 실패 회복 방안을 제시해야 한다. 예를 들면, 이성적 BRQ 고객에게 금전 보상이나 공정성 거래, 친밀감 및 사랑 고객에게 감정배려, 상호의존 고객에게 호혜성 설득 등 방안을 상황에 맞게 개발해야 한다. 본 연구는 서비스 실패 후 귀인의 매개효과를 탐색적으로 검증하 였는데 BRQ-귀인-감정 과정에서의 여러 가지 조절요인을 고려하지 않는 한계점이 있다. 따라서 추후의 연구에서 서비스 실패 강도의 조절효과를 고려해야 하고 더 완전한 모형을 구축해야 한다.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of service failure magnitude on perceived justice, positive emotion, and revisit intention at restaurants between a collectivist culture(Korea) and an individualistic culture(United States). The results showed that the higher a customer`s perception of service failure magnitude, the lower the perceived recovery justices in both cultures. The distributive, procedural, and interactional justices had a favorable effect on positive emotions in both cultures. Other findings revealed that interactional justice was the best predictor of revisit intention in Korea, while distributive justice was the best determinant of revisit intention in the United States. This research suggests that global restaurant managers need to understand how cultural orientation influences consumer perceptions of service failures in order to develop a highly targeted and effective service recovery.

Purpose – Past research has not given much attention to the roles of consumers’ social relationship type in the effects of justice type of service failure recovery alternatives on their satisfaction to the alternative exposed to them. Current research aimed at exploring the moderation role of consumers’ social relationship central versus peripheral in the effects of justice types of service failure recovery alternatives on the recovery satisfaction, and this research also explored whether the level of satisfaction to interaction justice-focused alternative are significantly different between the two, their social relationship central and peripheral relationship. Research design, data, and methodology – 2(social relationship central versus peripheral) between-subjects design was employed. 50 participants for each experimental group there were. Participants of each group took forceful steps in choosing one between the procedural justice-focused alternative and the distribution justice-focused alternative. χ2-analysis was used to verify that the number of choosing each alternative becomes different between the two experimental groups, and a one way ANOVA was used to verify that the extent to which participants are satisfied to the alternative chosen by them becomes different between the two groups. Results – The number of participants choosing procedural justice-focused alternative at the group of social relationship central was larger than that at the group of social relationship peripheral, whereas the number of participants choosing distribution justice-focused alternative at the group of social relationship peripheral was larger than that at the group of social relationship central. And the level of satisfaction to procedural justice-focused alternative at the group of social relationship central was higher than that at the group of social relationship peripheral, whereas the level of satisfaction to distribution justice-focused alternative at the group of social relationship peripheral was higher than that at the group of social relationship central. In addition, the level of satisfaction to interaction justice-focused alternative was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions – Marketers should give attention to the type of justice when developing alternatives by which consumers’ service failure can be recovered. They should suggest procedural justice-focused alternative to consumers under social relationship central, whereas they should develop distribution justice-focused alternative for consumers under social relationship peripheral. And in the process of recovering service failure they also should focus on interaction justice.