Today’s digital economy has gradually emerged as a new engine of innovation for China’s economic growth. However, while injecting new vitality into the Chinese economy, digital globalization has also brought a series of challenges to China, such as data security, digital divide, unregulated competition among digital platforms, and a lack of mechanisms for protecting property rights. These issues underscore China's insufficient capacity for effectively regulating and systematically governing the digital economy. In contrast, South Korean government has implemented the ‘Korea Digital Strategy’ (KDS) and the ‘Basic Law for Promoting the Revitalization and Utilization of Data’ (Data Industry Act) to foster the development of the digital economy industry. These measures effectively solve the problems of digital industry development and governance, and thus improve the legal system of South Korea’s digital economy. Therefore, this study compares the construction of digital economy legal system in China and South Korea through comparative analysis, summarizes the experience of digital economy legal system construction in South Korea, and offers three insights for the development of China’s digital economy legal system. Firstly, China needs to improve the coordination of its laws for the digital economy, avoid repetitive and overlapping legislation, and enhance the scientificity and authority of legislation; Secondly, China needs to adopt a systematic and comprehensive approach to legislating and governing the digital economy, ensuring the consistency and coherence of the system; Thirdly, China needs to conduct more basic research, pay attention to the ethical and legal implications, and keep the legal system up to date, so as to ensure the effectiveness of the law.

This paper explores the effect of the digital economy on human migration in Guangdong Province. This paper measures the effect of digital economy development on human migration in 21 prefecture-level cities in Guangdong Province, China, from 2011 to 2019 using a fixed-effects model. The results of this study show that there is a significant positive effect of digital economy on net migration rate, and there is a significant negative effect on emigration rates. There is also a significant pull effect of economic development level and health-care level on migration. This finding holds after introducing instrumental variables estimation. This study provides explanatory mechanisms and empirical evidence for the development of digital economy and human migration, which helps to understand the mechanism of action between the development of digital economy and human migration. On this basis, this study puts forward policy recommendations, which provide some reference basis for the formulation of policies on digital economy and talent introduction in Guangdong Province.

The development of the Internet and digital technology has given rise to a new form of cultural industry - digital literacy, and the trend of all-media convergence has also promoted the production and marketing of IP, and the space for the development of digital literacy under the IP strategy and the market demand are constantly expanding. Due to the problems of insufficient exploitation and utilisation, low technology level, content homogenisation and serious piracy of China's IPs, the feasible paths of building a digital cultural and creative industry chain, all-media marketing, establishing a digital copyright protection system, guiding the orderly competition of IPs, and carrying out international cooperation have been put forward with the combination of theories and practices, to improve the efficiency of IP production, content quality and digitalisation, stimulate the innovation of content and science and technology, protect digital copyrights, and provide a better service for China's high-quality digital copyright production and marketing. Protection of digital copyright, and provide a reference for the creation of high-quality digital cultural and creative IP in China.

디지털 경제의 급속한 발전으로 전통적인 과세제도가 새로운 경제 형태인 디지털경제에 더 이상 적용 할 수 없게 한다. 디지털 경제 발전에 걸맞은 조세제도를 적극적으로 구축하는 것은 오늘날 사회에서 직면해야 할 과제다. 본 연구는 먼저 디지털 경제의 정의와 특징 및 디지털세에 대해 기술하였다. 디지털경제가 중국의 경제·사회에 가져온 새로운 변화를 착안점으로 납세 주체의 감독, 과세 대상의 확정, 과세지의 결정 등 현행 조세제도에 대한 디지털 경제의 도전을 체계적으로 분석했다. 이와 함께 디지털 경제에 따른 과세 문제가 경제사회 발전의 효율성과 공정성에 미치는 부정적 영향도 살펴보았다. 시장 메커니즘의 왜곡, 재정수입의 손실, 조세권 배분의 불공평 및 조세부담의 불균형 등 문제를 포함한다. 그 다음 관련 국제기구 및 국가들의 디지털 경제 조세 도전에 대한 대응책을 정리했다. OECD는 국제 조세 제도의 개편을 촉진하기 위한 Two-Pillar 계획, UN이 이중과세방지 협약에 신설하는 제12B 조항, EU가 역내 조세규칙 조정을 추진하는 방안 그리고 미국이 국내 조세제도 개혁을 추진하는 방안 등이다. 마지막으로 본 연구는 디지털 경제에 따른 과세 도전에 대한 국제적 대응방안과 중국 조세정책의 문제점을 기초하여 조세제도, 세금 징수·관리 능력, 국제적 조세 협력의 세 가지 측면에서 디지털경제에 걸맞은 조세제도를 보완하는 대책을 제안했다.

This study aims to analyze the digital performance of Kazakhstan through dynamic analysis of national statistics and international indices as Global Innovation Index and ICT Development Index. The research combines three stages: analysis of digital transformation policies performance, review of ICT industry development, and comparative analysis of the positions of Kazakhstan, Turkey and South Korea as a benchmark in the international indices. This research findings show that despite great efforts of Kazakhstan in digitalization, the ICT industry contribution does not increase, it even falls. The international indices demonstrate that the reason is the weakness of the country in skills, venture capital, and innovation linkages. This leads to low knowledge, technology outputs, and creative outputs. The enablers of digital and overall innovation advancement of economy are identified. According to the international rankings the country has been doing its best in Access and Use areas. Another enablers are good business environment, ease of starting a business, protecting minority investors, and FDI inflows. The findings help to draw recommendations for strategic directions in order to improve the digital performance in Kazakhstan. The main limitation of this study is a lack of dynamic information on positions of Kazakhstan in other international indices related to digitalization.

Purpose - In the digital era, technology advancement enables goods and services to be produced more efficiently but also create economy risk in the global economy including Indonesia. Previous studies stated that the risk can be mitigated through export diversification. This study investigates strategy to expand the markets for existing products and explore the potential market. Research design, data, and methodology - The criteria was followed using a review and considerations combination through the Focus Group Discussion (FGD) to determine the priority product in trading house of Indonesia. This study implemented market share to explore those products’ markets and compare it to other ASEAN countries. Results - The Indonesian potential products are T-shirts, singlets and other vests of textile materials, knitted or crocheted (excluding cotton); food preparations; medicaments consisting of mixed or unmixed products for therapeutic or prophylactic purposes; soap in the form of flakes, granules, powder, paste or in aqueous solution; and cocoa powder, not containing added sugar or other sweetening matter. The market analysis also showed that Indonesia still had not optimally accessed yet the largest market in the world for each product. Conclusions - The government should focus more on increasing the competitiveness of those products, particularly in those global marketplaces.