The purpose of this study was to verify the change in temperature·humidity·perspiration of fire suit when applying phased intensive exercises to fire fighter wearing fire suit. For this study, three male fire fighters took basic physical test and performed 10 minute phased intensive exercises -exercise intensity I (30%VO2max), exercise intensity II (45%VO2max), exercise intensity III (60%VO2max) based on maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max)- wearing fire suit (helmet, boots, air respirator) in treadmill and took a rest. The result of study shows that the temperature in the suit elevated during stabilization period after each exercise intensity, humidity elevated as exercise intensity increased, perspiration elevated as exercise intensity increased.

The purpose of this study was to verify the relationship between fire fighter's musculoskeletal disorder related observable symptom and their absence from disease and accident. Online questionnaire was distributed with a total of 7,673 fire fighters, and statistical analysis was conducted to the collected data. The result shows that on a one year basis, patients with musculoskeletal disorder related observable symptom felt symptom in sequence of back, shoulder, neck, knee. The result verified that 12.9% of absence of disease and 5.9% of absence of accident experienced these symptoms. Both absence from disease and absence from accident showed body part symptoms related to neck and shoulder. This study ascertained the relationship between fire fighters' absence and their musculoskeletal disorder related observable symptom. The author hopes this study to be used as a basis of precautionary program for absence management.

화재 현장은 매우 높은 온도 및 습도가 요구되는 장소이며, 또한 소화활동 중에도 폭발 및 붕괴 등의 위험이 상존하는 장소이다. 이러한 극한 환경에서 근무하고 있는 소방대원에게 소방진압복은 생명을 담보하는 중요한 장비이며, 이 기초장비의 성능이 화재진압의 성공과 실패에 큰 영향을 미칠 수 있다. 그러나 유럽 및 미국의 소방진압복의 성능기준과 국내 소방진압복의 성능기준에 있어 일부 차이가 있다. 본 연구에서는 각 대륙별 소방진압복의 성능기준을 비교 검토하여 공통시험기준 및 비공통시험기준을 도출하여 소방대원들이 보다 안전하고 효율적으로 화재진압활동을 수행할 수 있도록 기존 국내 소방진압복의 시험기준에 화재현장의 환경조건에 필수적인 시험기준(안)을 선정하여 추후 시험기준의 개정 추진시 신규 시험기준(안)을 추가할 수 있는 이론적 배경을 제시하고자 한다.