자율운항선박의 기술혁신과 상용화는 해운산업의 패러다임을 근본적으로 변 화시키고 있으며, 그 과정에서 인공지능의 발전이 중요한 역할을 담당하고 있 다. 그러나 디지털 융복합에 기반한 기술적 혁신에도 불구하고, 선원의 인권 보호와 프라이버시 침해 등과 같은 문제는 여전히 법적 사각지대로 남아있는 실정이다. 따라서 이 연구는「자율운항선박 개발 및 상용화 촉진에 관한 법 률」 제19조에 인권영향평가 조항을 신설함으로써 자율운항선박의 운항 과정 에서 발생할 수 있는 선원 인권 침해 요소를 사전에 식별하고 방지할 수 있는 규제적 장치를 마련하고자 한다. 특히 이 연구에서 제안하는 신설 조항은 자율 운항선박법 제19조의 개정을 통해 선원의 인권 보호와 해사데이터 보안을 담 보할 수 있는 의무 조항을 포함하도록 하고, 해양수산부장관이 자율운항선박의 시범운항 및 실증 과정에서 선원의 인권 보호를 위한 인권영향평가를 의무적으 로 시행할 수 있는 법적 근거를 명확히 하는 데 목적을 둔다. 더불어 이 연구는 2024년 기준 국회에서 논의 중인 「인공지능 기본법」 등의 관련 법령과의 연 계를 통해 자율운항선박과 연계된 이해관계자들의 프라이버시 및 데이터 보안 문제를 국내외 다중사례분석 방법에 기반하여 층위별로 분석하였으며, 국제해 사기구의 MASS Code 등 국제 규범과의 조화를 통한 제도 개선 방안을 포함하 고 있다. 따라서 이 연구는 향후 선원인권영향평가 기준의 실효성을 검증하여 자율운항선박의 상용화에 대비하여 사전예방의 관점에서 선원인권 침해를 최 소화하면서 신뢰성과 안전성을 갖춘 선박운항이 가능하도록 하는 법적·제도적 기초를 확립하는 데 기여할 것이다.

This research will examine how the Indonesian constitution can effectively protect the indigenous people’s rights to customary land when the land is under construction for infrastructure building. The authors will mainly discuss the relevance of justice for ensuring the rights to live and property of indigenous people under the Indonesian constitution. In this essay, the authors examine how constitutional and human rights protections interact with one another to ensure the security of customary land in Indonesia. The analysis will be carried out by two methodological approaches. One is the statute approach which is based on laws and regulations being specifically targeted. To implement the statutory approach, all Indonesian laws and regulations concerning the constitutional relationship and human rights to protect customary land will be reviewed. The other is the conceptual approach to identify the ideas that give rise to legal notions, the legal principles or legal arguments for solving the problem.

This explorative paper investigates the application of human rights to civil law cases in Indonesia. Human rights are often placed within the realm of public law. Yet, fundamental rights and freedoms also apply to private law cases. The human rights literature, however, does not exist in Indonesian private law. This article explores how human rights are applied in Indonesian civil law cases with reference to the models of human rights application developed by Aharon Barak and Olha Cherednychenko. We found that in Indonesia, judges apply human rights law to civil law cases indirectly, yet this application is inconsistent. The Supreme Court has attempted to increase legal unity by making case law (yurisprudensi) more accessible and by issuing internal regulations that must serve as guidelines for judges-including the application of fundamental rights in civil law cases. Case law and guidelines, however, lack thorough legal reasoning and are, therefore, difficult to apply to complex cases.

The bereaved families of Cheju massacres(1947-1954) and civil society have constantly demanded that the state establish incomplete transitional justice in Jeju, South Korea. Significant progress has been made in establishing transitional justice in South Korea to heal the victims of the Cheju Massacres, but there has been no progress in engagement or discussion between the US government and society in this regard. A book, “Healing the Persisting Wounds of Historical Investment : United States, South Korea and the Jeju 4·3 Tragedy” that compiles the full discussion of theoretical and practical framework, social healing through justice proposed by Eric K. Yamamoto for the recovery of the damage caused by the massacres of civilians has been published and is attracting attention.

The nexus between science and human rights are intertwined in many ways. Though the acknowledgment in international law have been available for decades, the right to savor the fruits of scientific advancement and its applicability has gained just small recognition of the human rights from the international community. A human rightsbased approach to science, technology, and development endeavors a concern for human rights at the heart of the international community facing with critical global challenges. Thus, the paper initially discusses the relevant international human rights instruments including laws, regulations, declarations, conventions and provides a thorough analysis. The doctrinal and qualitative study of the paper presents human rights approaches in order to show insight on the ethical implications of new technologies and investigate how policy can compete with briskly advancing science. The paper also recommends the international community to promote regulatory processes that can help in blocking the disputes by securing an equilibrium between human rights and science.