본고는 코퍼스를 활용한 중국어 시각 동사 ‘看’의 원형 의미 연구 방법과 사용범위 에 대해 연구하고자 한다. ‘爱汉语’ 코퍼스에서 내려받은 시각 동사 ‘看’의 코퍼스 처 리 작업을 위한 분석 도구로써 EmEditor를 사용하며, 코퍼스 분석 프로그램인 AntC onc를 사용하여 시각 동사 ‘看’의 원형 의미에 대한 사용범위를 살펴보고자 한다. 또 한 워드 클라우드를 활용하여 시각 동사 ‘看’의 결합 관계를 분석하며, 시각 동사 ‘看’ 의 사용범위 또한 도식화하여 고찰하고자 한다.

본고는 한·중 감각어 중 하나인 시각어에 대한 원형 의미와 의미 확장 그리고 특 성에 대해 알아보고자 한다. 그중 한국어의 시각어 중 토박이말을 대상으로 주요 시 각 동사와 시각 형용사를 살펴보고, 이에 상응하는 중국어의 시각 동사와 시각 형용 사를 살펴보고 비교 분석하고자 한다. 한국어의 주요 시각 동사로는 ‘보다’를, 시각 형용사로는 ‘밝다·어둡다, 희다·검다·붉다·푸르다·누르다’를, 이에 대한 중국어의 시각 동사는 ‘看’을, 시각 형용사는 ‘亮, 暗, 白, 黑, 红, 蓝, 黄’을 살펴보고 비교 분석 하고 자한다.

Shuowen Tongxun Dingsheng 說文通訓定聲, as a representative work by Zhu Junsheng who is a famous expert in study of Shuowen Jiezi 說文解字(hereafter Shuowen) in Qing Dynasty, consists of three parts: Shuowen 說文, Tongxun 通訓, and Dingsheng 定聲. This book in Shuowen the part is based on the word meaning system, and corrected the error of explaining the original meaning. It includes the following eight types: 1. corrected the error of explaining the original meaning of Shuowen because of the wrong glyph analysis; 2. corrected the error of explaining the original meaning of Shuowen because of the philosophical thoughts of yin and yang five elements; 3. corrected the error of explaining the original meaning of Shuowen because the intending meaning is wrongly regarded as original meaning; 4. corrected the error of explaining the original meaning of Shuowen because the loaning meaning is wrongly regarded as original meaning; 5. corrected the error of explaining the original meaning of Shuowen because the contextual meaning is wrongly regarded as original meaning; 6. corrected the error of explaining the original meaning of Shuowen because the meaning of continuous words is wrongly regarded as original meaning; 7. corrected the error of explaining the original meaning of Shuowen because the meaning of overlapping words is wrongly regarded as original meaning; 8. corrected the error of explaining the original meaning of Shuowen because the language source meaning is wrongly regarded as original meaning. The value and significance of these researches lie in helping to use materials in Shuowen correctly and scientifically, and helping to understand the way of interpretating Shuowen.

Shirakawa Shizuka recognizes the Chinese Character before the Warring States Period as a kind of sacred one which exists in a way of series. For example, he interpreted the meaning of ‘Kou (口)’ according to its structure prior to the Period, regarding the meaning as the symbolization of an instrument used for praying. Then, he thought all the Chinese Characters with the structure element of ‘Kou’ should belong to the sacred. But his recognition is not correct. First, the interpretation of ‘Kou’ as the prayer instrument with the prayer character is wrong. So, the interpretation of serial characters of ‘Kou’ based on his misinterpretation of ‘Kou’ also proves to be wrong. Second, except the abovementioned mistakes, Shirakawa Shizuka made some other mistakes in his research on the serial characters of ‘Kou’ as well. But in this paper, we will just take examples of the characters such as ‘Gao (告)’, ‘Yue (曰)’, and ‘Yan (言)’, to point out the mistakes.

“Liushu（六书）” is a general term for the whole knowledge of an course about Chinese character in elementary education，which contains the source of pattern，reasons and rules of structure，relationship between different characters in a Chinese character cluster，and rules of using these characters to record Chinese language，etc. Based on all those knowledge，the teaching system of Chinese character but not a single style system has been found. In the past long time，the have been misunderstanding that “Liushu”（六书） represented six ways of character-maken，or six styles of character structure. The misunderstanding did not conform to initial fact of “Liushu”（六书）. In academic history of science of Chinese character，the study of “Liushu”（六书） came into being. But the study cannot be equated with “Liushu”（六书） itself. Because of misunderstanding，the study goes out of the scope of teaching. As a matter of fact，the selected points of knowledge and terms about “Liushu”（六书） are appropriate for elementary education requirement，its main value is in teaching，but not theorizing. If we want to correct mistakes in modern reading education，a possible solution may be to pick up “Liushu”（六书）.