PURPOSES : This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of pressure relief joints (PRJs) installed on highways for preventing blow-ups. METHODS : To evaluate the performance of a PRJ, pavement surface images were acquired by conducting a follow-up survey through on-site visual inspection and an automated pavement condition survey. The PRJ widths in the acquired pavement images were measured using image analysis software, and major distress in the PRJ was identified. The relationship between the performance period and the joint width was bi-linearized, and the causes of distress and repair methods for PRJ were suggested. RESULTS : As a result of the first survey, it became known that the width of a PRJ rapidly decreases after installation owing to an expansion of the concrete slab. The width of a PRJ continued to decrease, with 94% of the joint below 30 mm and 64% of the joint being below 10 mm, based on the fourth survey. The PRJ width of an Alkali-Aggregate Reaction (AAR) section decreased more than that of a normal section, but the difference in the average width between both sections decreased from 9.7 mm to 2.7 mm over the measured period. A bilinear estimation equation was developed based on the survey data. Through the estimation equation, it could be confirmed that joint contraction accelerated after installation owing to the effects of AAR, and that the joint widths of both sections converged to a similar level over the measurement period. As the result of the major distress analysis indicates, joint seal failure occurred in 70% of the joints, and the distress rates in terms of cracks, edge breakouts and spalling, and patching were 73%, 57%, and 28%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS : With the follow-up survey it could be confirmed that the concrete slab continued to expand despite seasonal changes, maintenance of the PRJ, and additional installation of new PRJs. The expansion of the concrete slab due to AAR is considered to be closely related to PRJ behavior. In addition, it is judged that major distress of the PRJ occurs at an early age owing to the instantaneous release of excessive compressive stress inherent in the slab during joint cutting.

PURPOSES : This study deals with a pressure relief joint, which is one of primary preventive methods of blow-up in concrete pavement. The purpose of the study is to estimate the joint sealant protrusion of pressure relief joint filler types according to horizontal displacement of concrete pavement by applying a variety of joint sealants and joint fillers. And test method for resistance of concrete to chloride ion penetration and test method for resistance of concrete to rapid freezing and thawing were conducted to analyze the improvement of concrete durability according to the primer types on concrete surface of stress relief joint. METHODS : Joint fillers of pressure relief joint were categorized into four different types, which are was styrofoam+backer+sealant(type 1), styrofoam+sealant(type 2), foaming styrofoam+sealant(type 3), and preformed joint+sealant(type 4). By varying the depth (10, 20, 30, 50 mm) from the top of the test specimens to the sealant’s surface, the test factors were evaluated for a total of 16 variables. When the specimen’s joint spacing decreased from 70mm to 10mm, the load was stopped. And the displacement of the center of the joint protrusion was measured. The test was terminated when the specimen joint spacing was reduced to 60 mm. The horizontal displacement at the time when the joint protrudes over the specimen surface is recorded and analyzed as the critical threshold displacement. RESULTS : According to the test results according to the type of joint filling material, it was found that there was a difference in the protrusion of the horizontal compression displacement according to the joint filling type. Under the current installation standard of 20mm, the preformed seal joint member showed the best crimping characteristics by securing the safety against protrusion until the horizontal displacement of 50mm occurred. CONCLUSIONS : The most common failures in pressure relief joints are those related to joint sealants, which can be minimized by changing the current joint type, installation depth, etc. to suppress them.