In this experiment, I used three samples of oils. The oils that I used were hydrated soybean oil, pure soybean oil and regular soybean oil. The group of rice was fried in the each sample of oil that had not been used for a few seconds. Rice was used after frying at 230-235℃ every four hours terms and total frying hours was 12 hours. The hydrated soybean oils was least affected in rancidity. The other two oils were more affected in rancidity than the hydrated soybean oil. However, the trans fatty acid in hydrated soybean oil was 36.5%. The diameter of the poped rice that was fried in pure soybean oil and regular soybean oil that had been used 12 for hours was reduced while the diameter of the popped rice fried in the hydrated soybean oil was not reduced. Also, the groups of rice fried in the pure and the regular soybean oil that had been used for 12 hours reduced the hardness in rice while the group that fried in the hydrated soybean oil at the 12th hour kept the hardness well. In sensory evaluation, rancidity order was found apparently in the pure soybean oil that had been used for 12 hour and in the regular soybean oil that have been used for eight hours and 12 hours. Only the hydrated soybean oil did not have distinctive rancidity order at all. The degree of the crispiness was reduced in the pure soybean oil and in the regular soybean oil at 12th hour frying. However, the hydrated soybean oil preserved the crispiness well until the end of 12 hours of frying. In overall preference test, the pure and regular soybean oil that had been used for 12 hour were not preferable. In conclusion, I found that the group fried in the hydrated soybean oil was better in every evaluation than the groups fried in the pure soybean oil and in regular soybean oil. The hydrated Soybean oil may be better to be used in food manufacturing if the trans fatty acid in the hydrated soybean oil can be reduced.

This study was conducted to confirm the effect of drying method on quality of popped rice for making salyeotgangjung(popped rice lump with malt syrup) in process of drying gelatinized rice. The drying were performed at dry oven or convection oven, at 30℃, 50℃ and 105℃, respectively. There were not significant differences in the hardness of popped rice among the drying methods. The dry at 30℃ constant in dry oven showed higher popping rate, good external surface, uniformed and well developed internal cell size. The dry at 30℃ in convection oven and 50℃ constant temperature in dry oven showed low expansion and poor external surface, respectively. In conclusion, the drying at 30℃ in non-convection oven had the highest quality of popped rice for salyeotgangjung.

쌀엿강정은 쌀을 호화 건조하여 유탕처리하거나 가압 등으로 팽화시켜서 제조한다. 이때 호화과정에서 가열기구나 호화의 정도가 쌀의 팽화에 영향을 미칠 것으로 판단되어 이들 처리에 따라 팽화량(크기, 비중), 사진촬영, 주사형 전자현미경(SEM)으로 관찰 비교하였다. 1. 전기밥솥이나 압력솥, 혹은 증기로 찌는 등 밥의 형태로 쌀을 호화시킨 것은 팽화쌀이 서로 부착된 것이 많아 좋지 않았다. 전기밥솥이나 압력솥의 경우는 팽화쌀의 표면에 파괴된 부분이 나타났다. 압력솥이나 증기고 찌는 경우는 쌀의 팽화량이 작았다. 2. 쌀을 세정하여 바로 많은 양의 물로 끓이는 방법이 좋았으며, 쌀을 불려서 끓이는 방법과 팽화량에 차이를 보이지 않았다. 쌀을 불리더라도 익을 정도로만 단시간에 끓일 경우에는 오히려 팽화량이 작았다. 3. 쌀을 끓이는 시간이 길수록 팽화는 컸으나 너무 지나칠 정도로 끓일 경우에는 쌀의 표면이 파괴되거나 균열이 생겨서 외관이 좋지 않고 팽화량도 작았다.