This study investigates the effects of the purpose of fishery firms’social contributions on consumers’ purchase intention as a mediator or their fishery firms’brand evaluation. We surveyed 300 consumers in order to empirically test the suggested relationship. The purpose of fishery firms’social contributions was divided into social contribution activities and public interest marketing strategies. Fishery firms’brand evaluation was divided into three aspects including brand awareness, brand image, and brand loyalty. The results showed that the purpose of fishery firms’social contributions significantly affect consumers’purchase intention, brand loyalty as well as brand image except brand awareness. Fishery firms’brand evaluation significantly affect consumers’purchase intention. This study suggests that social contribution activities and public interest marketing strategies are essential for the positive brand evaluation of fishery firms.
This study proposes a priority model for program directors in charge of Corporate Social Contribution to make the best decision. This empirical analysis aims to discover the most significant area among various programs of Corporate Social Contribution Activities. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to test the priority model. The study attempts to demonstrate how the model helps providing better decision choices in corporate practices. The priority preference in Corporate Social Contribution Activities programs among corporate social contribution practitioners, PR professors and NGO activists are studied for their priority on corporate social contribution programs, among they valued com mon benefit social activity most important.
The study proposes a priority model for program directors in charge of Corporate Social Contribution to make the best decision. This empirical analysis aims to discover the most significant area among various programs of Corporate Social Contribution Activities. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to test the priority model. The study attempts to demonstrate how the model helps providing better decision choices in corporate practices. The priority preference in Corporate Social Contribution Activities programs among corporate social contribution practitioners, PR professors and NGO activists is examined in order to present preferred programs of corporate social contribution programs, which they value the most as a part of overall social welfare.