본 연구에서는 도시와 농ㆍ어촌 아동들의 가족건강성과 자아탄력성에 의한 학교생활 만족도에 대해 비교 분석을 중심으로 두 지역간의 차이를 검증하고 이에 관련된 변인들을 규명하였다. 또한 아동의 가족건강성과 자아탄력성이 학교생활 만족도에 미치는 영향에 대해 분석해 보았다. 좀 더 나아가 지역적 요소를 변인으로 넣어 도시와 농ㆍ어촌 지역의 아동들의 학교생활 만족도를 비교 분석하여 환경적인 측면이 아동들에게 어떻게 영향을 미치는지 대해서도 알아보았다. 지역적으로 비교분석을 하기 전에 아동의 가족건강성과 자아탄력성, 학교생활 만족도, 즉 독립변인과 종속변인의 상관관계를 분석한 결과 가족건강성과 자아탄력성, 가족건강성과 학교생활만족도, 자아탄력성과 학교생활만족도 간에 통계적으로 유의미한 정적 상관이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이것은 어떠한 변인보다 가족건강성과 자아탄력성이 학교생활 만족도에 영향을 미친다는 결과라고 볼 수 있다. 이 연구의 의의와 그 시사점을 논하고 제언을 제시하였다.

Due to climate change combined with urban concentration of population, the frequency and intensity of urban flooding and its risks have been increased. In most cases, such disasters pose impediments to sustainable economic and human development. Because of heavy precipitation caused by climate change exceeding the current capacity of infrastructure as well as the concentration of population by urbanization, the damages of urban floods on humans and property losses have become more serious among natural disasters. The social impacts of flood disasters vary by different people as some people have limited access to the means of preparedness, response, and recovery. Experiencing extreme flooding events in recent years, the City of Seoul put forth much effort into tackling the flood damages, including preparing disaster risk maps, improved infrastructure such as capacity-enhanced sewages, rainwater pumping facilities, rainwater storage tanks and permeable pavements. Despite these efforts to improve infrastructures there have been vulnerable populations who are easily exposed to the climate risks and easily become the victims of floods, and sometimes become more likely to go into vicious cycles of vulnerability both socio-economically and in terms of disaster resilience. By looking into the historic disaster data and flood hazard maps for cases of heavy flooding events in recent years in Seoul, and comparing them with the demographic data by social categories, this report tries to focus on the disaster resilience of the vulnerable classes. Finally and more importantly, this report discusses on how to further improve the resilience for those who are identified to be more vulnerable. To protect and support the vulnerable populations countries and cities have developed their own policy measures, manuals and guidelines. Through the comparison of policy measures in representative cities including Tokyo, London, and New York this study finds more room for further policy improvements for vulnerable populations in Seoul. The central and local government, relevant agencies and communities need to cooperate in addressing adaptation to disasters with target-specific welfare for the vulnerable people, which will enhance social inclusiveness in climate resilience.