Digital technology has been increasingly applied in the traditional tourism forms, including the heritage tourism. However, the role of technology and tradition for attracting tourists in industrial heritage tourism destinations has not been clearly identified. To narrow the research gaps, this study adopted a two stage study, based on grounded theory and factor analyses. In Study 1, through the data analysis of 60 in-depth interviews, 10 stimuli factors in 3 categories were identified. In Study 2, a questionnaire was developed based on the results of Study 1, through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), we established and tested a model of on-site stimulus factors. Findings can deepen the understanding of industrial heritage tourism from a tourist perspective and offer practical implications.

현행 주차장법상의 부설주차장 설치기준은 위락시설, 문화 및 집회시설, 단독주택, 공장 등 설치 대상 시설물을 9개 그룹으로 분류하고, 그룹 내 시설물에 대해서는 동일한 설치기준이 제시되어 있다. 지자체는 필요에 따라서 지자체 조례로 시설물의 종류를 세분하거나 설치기준의 2분의 1의 범위(±50%) 안에서 이를 강화 또는 완화할 수 있도록 되어 있다. 최근 건축물의 종류가 다양해지고 기능이 혼재되어 같은 그룹에 속하더라도 시설물에 따라 주차장설치기준을 세분화할 필요가 있으나, 대부분 지자체의 경우 체계적이고 일관된 기준 없이 주차장법에서 제시된 시설분류기준에 강화된 획일적인 설치기준을 조례에 적용하고 있다. 특히, 산업단지 내 위치한 대규모 첨단제조시설의 경우 공정이 자동화되어 건물규모대비 근무인력이 소수임에도 불구하고 이에 대한 별도의 세부적인 구분없이 기타시설 또는 공장시설로 분류되어 일반 제조공장과 동일한 일괄적 기준을 적용하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 현장조사를 통해 산업단지 내 공장시설에 대한 기존 주차원단위 산정에 대한 문제점을 분석하고, 이를 해결하기 위해 방안으로 용도 및 규모특성을 고려한 부설주차장 설치기준 개선방안을 제시하였다.

According to statistics released by the Ministry of Labor for the past 6 years, work-related accidents in the construction industry have been on the continued increase, resulting in social and economic losses that are difficult to determine at an exact amount. However, the number will likely get much bigger if unreported cases are included, considering the fact that the aforementioned statistics are based soley on the applications filed with Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service. The practice of businesses choosing not to report and dealing with industrial accidents in an unauthorized manner is defined as "concealment of industrial accident". The reason the employers tend to engage in the concealment practice even at their huge cost is a "pre-qualification" scheme for the applicants in the government procurement process. Under the pre-qualification scheme, the applicants with a high rate of industrial accidents receive a low grade and become less attractive candidates in the procurement process, thus losing an opportunity to win a contract. Such failure relates directly to the fate of business organizations, to survive or not. That is why they are making all-out efforts to obtain a high grade in the pre-qualification evaluation. With regard to the accident-concealment problem, the following can be mentioned as preventive measures: (1) To exclude a rate of industrial accidents from the pre-qualification scheme; (2) To strengthen the institution of imposing penalties on the occurrence of industrial accidents; (3) To introduce private insurance system to the current industrial accident compensation insurance; and (4) To give non-recognition treatment to industrial accidents that were not reported upon occurrence. In conclusion, the concealment problem can be resolved if the aforementioned measures are to be taken continuously along with corrective measures against institutional deficiencies.