This study investigated the tracking loss rate and shear bond strength under various conditions to evaluate the properties of a trackless tack coat used in asphalt pavement maintenance and conducted a field investigation in which the trackless tack coat was used. Typically, the loss rate and bond strength of a tack coat depend on various conditions. Therefore, to evaluate the loss rate of the tack coat, a wheel-tracking attachment loss rate and tack lifter test were conducted by simulating high-temperature exposure conditions, and the shear bond strength was measured according to the surface condition of the bottom layer. In addition, field investigations of cracks, rutting, and potholes were conducted at 11 sites five years after the application of the trackless tack coat. The results of the wheel-tracking loss rate evaluation showed that the loss rate differed depending on the conditions of the bottom layer, and the loss rate of the trackless tack coat was very low at the same temperature as that of the rapid strength concrete (RSC). In addition, in the results of tack lifter test at 65℃, which had the highest loss rate by wheel tracking loss rate test, it was found that loss rate of trackless tack coat was 0%–29% lower than that of RSC for the same exposure time. As a result of evaluating the effect of the bottom layer's condition on the shear bond strength, it was found that the trackless tack coat was about 20% higher than RSC under the same conditions. In addition, when foreign substances such as dust were present in the bottom layer, the shear bond strength was reduced by approximately 28%. Field investigations of the trackless-applied section showed that potholes and rutting did not occur, and alligator cracks and linear cracks occurred in some sections; however, it was judged that there was little direct relationship with the trackless tack coat. The trackless tack coat was found to have a slight loss owing to tracking, even at relatively high temperatures, and the shear bond strength was excellent. In addition, if the construction process is properly conducted, an advantage will be attained in securing the performance life of asphalt pavements.

PURPOSES : Recently, interest in maintaining aged concrete pavements has been increasing. An asphalt overlay is generally used for pavement maintenance, and a tack coat is used to secure interlayer adhesion. Particularly, aged concrete pavements are required for higher adhesion performance of tack coats for attaching interlayers to materials with different properties. Insufficient interlayer adhesion could cause pavement damage, such as slippage, rutting, shoving, corrugation, and pothole. In this study, we examined the performance of interface adhesion by applying a tack coat material developed for maintaining aged concrete pavement. METHODS : In this study, we examined the effect of adhesion performance at the pavement interface, using a tack coat material developed for the maintenance of aged concrete pavement. RESULTS : The developed tack coat not only accomplished the performance objectives but also improved the results by more than 12 to 43%, compared to commonly used materials. CONCLUSIONS : The use of developed tack coat is expected to improve the interlayer adhesion and reduce the delay of the maintenance process in aged concrete pavement.

PURPOSES:The purpose of this paper is to evaluate interface performance while using various tack coat materials for asphalt overlay.METHODS:The evaluation was conducted with tracking test, permeability, and interface bond strength. Tracking test was conducted using an image processing technique, to investigate the susceptibility of the tack coat materials. BBS and pull-off test were conducted to evaluate bond strength. The permeability test was conducted to evaluate the effect of tack coat materials.RESULTS :Results reveal that the trackless tack coat material demonstrates less tracking compared to other materials. Moreover, both BBS and pull-off tests can effectively evaluate the bond strength at the interface. RSC-4 was measured less bond strength. Moreover, tack coat prevents water penetration through the surface and aids the extension of the surface life of asphalt pavement.CONCLUSIONS :Trackless tack coat demonstrated a high and consistent bond strength performance. The tack coat types demonstrate marginally different performance as function of curing times. Field applicability was tested based on visual observation. Therefore, these should be considered when trackless tack coat is slightly enhanced the pavement performance based on limited this study results. Finally, it is necessary to allow reasonable time for the tack coat to completely cure.