Wolsong Unit 1 nuclear power plant, which was permanently shut down in 2019, has a 678 MWe calandria vessel of the CANDU-6 type pressurized heavy-water reactor model. The calandria inside the vault is a horizontal cylindrical vessel made of stainless steel with a length of 7.8 m and a thickness of 28.6 mm. For the entire dismantling processes of a nuclear power plant, dismantling works cannot be performed using only one cutting technology and method, and when performing dismantling of a calandria vessel, various systems and components can be used for cutting and dismantling. The calandria vessel is located in a concrete compartment called a vault, and in order to safely dismantle the calandria vessel, the spread of radioactive contaminants from inside of the vault to the outside must be prevented. We designed dismantling processes using the laser cutting method to dismantle the calandria vessel and end shields. We must minimize the risk of internal radiation exposure to workers from aerosols derived from the thermal cutting processes. Therefore, we need a way to prevent secondary contamination from spreading outside the vault and within the reactor building. The path through which radioactive contaminants move is that the flying airborne products generated during the cutting process inside the vault where the calandria is located do not stay in place but spread outward through the opening of the RM-Deck structure at the top. Therefore, facilities or devices are needed to effectively prevent the spread of radioactive contaminants by blocking the expected movement path. By using these facilities or devices, it is possible to prevent the movement of radioactive aerosol particles between the location of the worker and the location of the cutting area where the calandria is located, thereby preventing internal exposure through the worker’s breathing. In addition, by using these, the cutting area where airborne pollutants are generated can be designed as an isolated work space to prevent the spread of radioactive contaminants. In this study, we propose a method of facilities for confining radioactive aerosol particles and preventing the spread of contamination when thermal cutting of the calandria vessel within the vault.

Concentrated effluent and spent ion exchange resins (IERs) from nuclear power plants (NPPs) were generated prior to the establishment of a disposal facility site and waste acceptance criteria have been temporarily stored at the NPPs because their suitability for disposal has not been confirmed. In particular, at the Kori Unit 1, which was the first to start the commercial operation in South Korea, the initially generated concentrated effluent and IERs are repackaged in large size of concrete containers and stored without provided regulation standard. The concentrated effluent is package as cementitious form in 200 L drums and repackaged in concrete containers, case of the IERs were solidified or dehydrated and repackaged in round concrete container. In this study, we review and propose a disposal plan for concentrated effluent and IERs repackaging drums that have not been confirmed to be suitable for disposal from the first operating nuclear power plant, Kori Unit 1, 2. First, the concentrated effluent was stored in four 200 L drums respectively, and then, it was again stored in concrete container and which was poured on top using grouted concrete. Therefore, the process was required by cutting concrete container for extracting the internal drums at first. Internal radioactive waste should be crushed to the suitable waste criteria and solidified, finally disposal in to the polymer concrete high integrity container (PC-HIC). IER was repackaged and disposal in square type of 200 L concrete drums respectively covered the cap. So, extracting the internal drums should be extracted after removing the cap of external concrete container. Cement solidification drums can be crushed and re-solidified or disposed in the PC-HIC. Stored IER after dehydrated can be disposal in PC-HIC. In conclusion, the container was used as a package that repackaging the concentrated effluent and IER was separated into two different types of waste depending on the level of contamination of radioactivity, the polluted area is disposed of as radioactivity contamination or the unspoiled area will be treated as self-disposal waste.

When decommissioning a nuclear power plant, a large amount of radioactive waste is generated simultaneously. Therefore, efficient treatment of radioactive waste is crucial to the success of the decommissioning process. An utility or decommissioning contractor of NPP often build separate radioactive waste treatment facilities (RWTF) to handle this waste. In Korea, RWTFs are planned to be built for the decommissioning of the Kori Unit 1 and Wolsong Unit 1. In this study, we introduce an application case of using process simulation to derive the optimal layout design and investment plan for a radioactive waste treatment facility. In particular, the steam generator is the largest and most complex device processed in RWTF. Therefore, it is necessary to reflect the large equipment processing area that can treat steam generators in the design of RWTF. In this study, Siemens’ Plant Simulation® was used to derive an optimization plan for the dismantling area of large equipment in RWTF. First, a virtual facility was built by modeling based on the steam generator dismantling process and facilities developed by Doosan Enerbility. This was used to pre-validate the facility investment plan, discover wasteful factors in the logistics waste streams, and evaluate alternatives to derive, validate, and apply appropriate improvement alternatives. Through this, we designed a layout based on the optimal logistics waste streams, appropriate workstations, and the number of buffer places. In addition, we propose various optimization measures such as investment optimization based on optimal operation of facility resources such as facilities and manpower, and establishment of work standards.

This study is for evaluation and optimization of workers’ radiation exposure for dismantling Reactor Vessel (RV) at Kori unit 1 in connection with its decommissioning process for the purpose of establishing Radiation Safety Management Plan. This is because the safety of workers in a radiation environment is an important issue. The basis of radiological conditions of this evaluation is supposed to be those of 10 years after the permanent shutdown of Kori unit 1 when dismantling work of Reactor Vessel would suppose to be started. Dose rates of work areas were evaluated on the basis of spatial dose rate derived from activation level calculated by MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport) and ORIGEN-S code. RV are radiated by neutrons during operation, creating an environment in which it is difficult for operators to access and work. Therefore, the RV must be dismantled remotely. However, due to work such as installing devices or dismantling surrounding structures, it is not possible to completely block the access of workers. Accordingly, the exposure of workers to the RV dismantling process should be assessed and safety management carried out. The dismantling process of Kori unit 1 RV was developed based on in-situ execution in atmospheric environment using the oxigen-propane cutting technology as the following steps of Preparation, Dismantling of Peripheral Structures, Dismantling of RV and Finishing Work. For evaluation of exposure of RV dismantling work, those processes of each steps are correlated with spatial dose rates of each work areas where the jobs being done. Results of the evaluation show that workers’ collective dose for RV dismantling work would be in the range of 536–778 man- mSv. The most critical process would be dismantling of upper connecting parts of RV with 170–256 manmSv while among the working groups, the expert group performing dismantling of ICI (In-core instrumentation) nozzles and handling & packaging of cut-off pieces is evaluated as the most significantly affected group with 37.5–39.4 man- mSv. Based on the evaluation, improvement plan for better working conditions of the most critical process and the most affected workers in terms of radiation safety were suggested.

The dismantling of the reactor pressure vessel has been carried out at a number of commercial nuclear power plants, including the Zion nuclear power plant in the United States and the Stade nuclear power plant in Germany. The dismantling method for the reactor pressure vessel is either in the air or in the water, depending on the utility. In general, a mechanical cutting method is used when dismantling the reactor pressure vessel in the water. And when dismantling a nuclear reactor pressure vessel in the air, the thermal cutting method is applied. However, there is no case of dismantling commercial nuclear reactor pressure vessel by applying a mechanical method in the air. In this study, when a nuclear reactor pressure vessel is dismantled by applying a mechanical method in the air, the applicability was evaluated by testing it using a demonstration mockup of Kori Unit 1. For the evaluation, the mockup was made in the actual size of Kori Unit 1. Mechanical cutting devices used the band saw and the circular saw. In the test, the cutting of the reactor pressure vessel was performed remotely by reflecting the working conditions of the decommissioning site. The band saw cutting method was applied to vertical cutting, and the circular saw cutting method was applied to horizontal cutting. In order to dismantle one cut-off piece, mockup test was performed according to a series of dismantling processes, it consists of preparatory work, vertical cutting process, horizontal cutting process, packaging process and finishing work. The cutting speed of the band saw is 3–10 mm·min−1, and the cutting speed of the circular saw is 2–4 mm·min−1. As a result of the test, when the mechanical cutting method was applied, as is known, the kerf width was smaller than when the thermal cutting method was applied. The cut surface showed a clean state without drag lines generated during thermal cutting. However, the working time was much slower than when the thermal cutting method was applied.