The purpose of this study is to find out the economic impacts of the CASSAVA project, IPM project, Post-Harvest project, and RICE project among 12 projects that are being worked on by the Asian Food & Agriculture Cooperation Initiative(AFACI) established in 2009. Reliable data such as FAO STAT etc. was utilized for the analysis on the economic impacts of each project and the data of an investigation on principal investigators of the nation who participate in each project was used for the analysis of the additional necessary information. According to the economic impacts analysis result, the economic impacts will occur and can be measured as an economic costs as follows: a total of $1,187,404 in Thailand for the next 19 years through the CASSAVA project, $2,358,299 in Indonesia for the next 18 years through the Post-Harvest project, $62,451,317 in Vietnam for the next 13 years through the Post- Harvest project and $60,629,555 in Nepal for the next 13 years through the RICE project. The AFACI project is a small project that annually supports each country that participates each project with approximately $ 10,000. Despite the small-scale project, the estimated result of economic impacts showed that great economic impacts occurred for its scale of the support. Thus, it is deemed that a search for ongoing methods that contribute to the role expansion of Korea and the agricultural development of the recipient country will be needed through the expansion and complementation of a low-cost and high efficiency Official Development Assistance(ODA) such as the AFACI project.

최근 인구 증가 및 기후 변화로 인해 채소를 비롯한 농작물에 대한 수요가 증가되고 있는 가운데 우즈베키스탄에서는 채소 및 식량자원의 자급 달성을 위한 대규모 사업을 추진하여 왔다. 그 결과독립 후 현재까지 약 20년간 채소 생산량은 약 140%, 감자는 168%각각 증가하였고, 특히 최근 5년간에 채소 생산량은 1.7배나 증가하였다. 채소 생산량의 증가에도 불구하고 우즈벡은 여전히 수요량을 충족하지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 이는 인구 증가와 더불어 정부의 목화와 곡물 생산 집중, 관개면적의 확대 제한 등에 기인하고있다. 우즈벡의 채소산업의 미래는 생산 장려와 수출가능성 때문에 밝다고 할 수 있다. 특히 채소 공급업자들은 러시아, 카자흐스탄과 같은 주요 수출시장에 기반을 구축해 있고 그 외 중앙아시아와 중국 시장도 우즈벡 채소산업의 성장 가능성을 말해 주고 있다.

This paper presents the interrelationship chart between software quality characteristics and engineering attributes. The software quality characteristics and their subcharacteristics are excerpted front IS0/1EC 9126 standards, and the engineering attributes are from Deutsch and Willis[4]. Based on the previous studies and subjective judgement, trisected interrelationship(strong, medium, weak) between these two groups are derived. The results are summarized in a table, and can be used as a quick reference guide to the software quality engineering applications such as quality evaluations for software products, selection of key engineering attributes for high-quality software production, and so forth.