The public safety management guidelines were introduced in 2019 and continue to be dedicated to advancing comprehensive measures for public safety management, with a primary focus on prioritizing the safety and well-being of the public within governmental institutions. To achieve this goal, our previous study developed a establishment procedure of risk assessment-based safety inspection system for public institutions that order construction projects and applied it to highway construction projects to evaluate its effectiveness. To enhance the practicality of the establishment procedure, it is essential to collect and analyze feedback from stakeholders regarding its performance and suitability. This study conducted a survey involving 200 participants who had experience with the establishment procedure, and performed statistical analyses to evaluate its performance and applicability. The survey results indicated that the participants reported a high level of satisfaction (scoring 4 and above on a 5-point Likert scale) in several areas: specialization of safety inspection items for different types of work (with a satisfaction rate of 65%), the evaluation process for safety ratings (64.5%), and their willingness to recommend the procedure to other institutions (75.5%). In the factor analysis with Varimax rotation, two factors emerged: (1) a specialization factor related to safety inspection items, and (2) a grading factor associated with safety evaluation results. Regression analyses of these factors unveiled significant positive relationships with improvements in safety and health performance, including the prevention of fatal accidents, heightened safety responsibility, and raised safety inspection standards. The establishment procedure of safety inspection system developed in our previous study can play a crucial role in reducing accidents resulting in fatalities and injuries at construction sites, ultimately contributing to a safer working environment for all involved parties.

This study is based on a survey conducted to understand the current problems of water leakages in underground structures. According to the overall results, 55.7% of the respondents replied that water leakage problems is serious and all replied that a preventative measure is absolutely necessary.

치수사업에 의한 갈등 문제의 본질은 하나의 구조물을 설치하는가의 여부가 아니라 비록 100% 합의와 만족은 어렵다할지라도 서로 다른 인식과 이해관계를 가지고 있는 다양한 집단들간에 어떻게 하면 감정적 마찰 없이 상이한 인식의 폭을 좁혀서 합의형성을 이루어 내는가에 있다. 이를 위해선 반드시 고려해야 할 사항은 가능한 한 계획의 수립단계에서부터 이해당사자가 참여할 수 있는 여건이 마련되어야 한다.따라서, 본 연구에서는 치수사업을 수행함에 있어 발생되는 갈등 문제에 대해 이해당사자와 더불어 정책입안자, 전문가 및 지역단체들의 참여가 가능하도록 치수 갈등 조정 모형인 공영시각모형(SVM)과 연계하여 참여범위를 제시하고 WEB기반의 이해관계자 설문 시스템을 구축하였다. 또한 이해관계자들의 설문 결과를 반영하기 위해 상대적이탈지수(RDI) 및 AHP기법 등을 적용하여 공영시각모형의 모의 시 각각의 분석에 필요한 지수 및 가중치 등을 산정하여 적용될 수 있도록 하였다. 이에 따라 이해당사자의 참여 배제에 의해 발생되는 갈등 문제에 대해 적용될 경우 합의점 도출을 위한 시스템 적용 시 유용하게 사용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.