본 연구는 소년범죄자의 소년사건처리절차 경험을 당사자의 관점으로 탐구함으로써 그에 관한 정보를 제공하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 본 연구 참여자는 소년사건처리절차를 경험한 8명의 소년으로 이들의 경험을 심층적으로 이해하기 위해 다중사례연구를 실시하였다. 연구결과는 소년사건처리절차의 과정인 경찰단계, 검찰단계, 법원단계, 교정단계로 나누 어 분석하였고, 총 14개의 주제로 범주화하였다. 본 연구에서 발견한 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 소년은 사법처리과정 중에 범죄 중단을 결심하지만 행동으로 이어지는 데는 어려움을 겪 고 있었다. 수개월의 사법처리 기간동안 소년은 어떠한 사법기관의 개입도 받지 않는 시기 가 존재했으며 이 기간에 재범을 일으키기도 했다. 소년사건처리절차 중 소년의 건강한 육 성을 목적으로 하는 교육적 처우는 교정단계에 비로소 이루어졌으며 사법처리과정의 경험은 소년범죄자의 가족 간 지지를 약화시키는 결과를 가져왔다. 이러한 연구 결과를 바탕으로 본 연구는 소년사건처리절차를 경험한 소년범죄자의 재범을 예방하기 위한 실천적, 정책적 제언을 논의하였다.

The purposes of this study are to review some practical experiences in multi-agency collaboration efforts for the juvenile delinquents in U.S. and to make policy implications, practice for a better multi-agency collaboration system in Korea. Based on these findings, this study suggests multi-agency collaboration for the juvenile delinquents in the juvenile justice process in Korea as follows: First, Goverment should legislate for multi-agency collaboration in the juvenile justice process, establish collaboration system and juvenile correctional center. Second, Collaboration managers or coordinator should be trained so that they can play a variety of professional roles in managing collaboration programs and developed the various programs. Third, The supporting organizations such as goverment, enterprises, schools, social welfare agency, united way, voluntary agency or group, community should be developed and, furthermore, supporting thing such as juvenile justice information resources, financial, technical assistance to enhance the capacity of those correctional institutions.

The purpose of this study is to investigate effects of the police, prosecution and the others's social support on stress responses and correction of the juvenile delinquents. To accomplish these purposes, this study used sample of 546 juvenile delinquents who are in the process of the juvenile justice. Social support and correction were assessed with an instrument designed for this study. Juvenile delinquents were assessed using the following variables: ⑴ perceived social support scale, specially social support types (esteem support, emotional support, informational support), social support providers (parents, relatives, friends, teachers, community) and police and prosecution's social support. ⑵ correction scale, specially social stigma, social deprivation, self reflection, legal consciousness, self concept. The resulting scale of the instrument had good internal reliability and was scored to show that high scores indicated a willingness to access. To examine this purpose, Mean, standard deviation, Two way ANOVA were conducted. The results are as follows: First, The effects of the police and prosecution's social support on stress responses did make significant difference. The less police and prosecution's social support they had, the more stress responses such as anger, anxiety, guilty feeling and resentment appeared. Second, the effects of the police and prosecution's social support on correction did make significant difference on the social deprivation, legal consciousness and self reflection. Therefore, the system like Youth Counseling Center which provides counseling, consultation, and information to the youth and their parents in early stage of the police and prosecution should be activated. And, Government should develope a formal and informal social support network for the juvenile delinquents.