The book Shuowen Jiezi Yizheng (说文解字翼徵) written by Piao Xuan-Shou, which is a book specializing in the study of Shuowen Jiezi (說文解字) in the late Joseon Dynasty, is the first one to utilize materials of bronze inscriptions objects and stone inscriptions to make supplements and textual criticism of Shuowen Jiezi (說文解字). The article organizes the stone-carved material of Zuchu Wen (詛楚文), which is quoted in the book, and analyzes it from the aspects of the meaning of the quotation, the source of the quotation, the quotation and the copying. After that, this paper revises and supplies the situation of Shuowen Jiezi (說文解字) by quoting Zuchu wen (詛楚文) in the book,and combines with specific examples of characters to annotate and comment. According to whether there is any interpretation, whether there is any new content in the interpretation, etc., it is divided into three categories. And under each word, the original content of Shuowen Jiezi (說文解字) quoted in the book, the supplementary ancient characters as well as the main content of the interpretation are cited firstly, and then explains Piao’s analysis of the words’ form and meaning appropriately, and Piao’s viewpoints are evaluated by making full use of ancient character materials and the results of the existing studies and interpretations. The purpose of this article is to clarify the factual situation of Piao’s quotation of the Zuchu Wen (詛楚文) , evaluate the gains and losses of Piao’s textual criticism of the Shuowen Jiezi (說文解字) objectively, and supply the shortages of current research on Piao’s quotation of materials other than the bronze inscriptions.

성대의 ≪六書尋源≫도 한자의 형성화 추세에 주목하여 형성자, 특히 형성자 성부의 표의기능에 대해서 깊게 연구하였다. 성대가 이처럼 형성자의 중요성을 인식하고 연구하게 된 데 ≪익징≫의 연구 성과가 직접적으로 영향을 주었다는 기록은 없다. 하지만 한자의 성부에 연구의 초점을 맞추었다는 공통점이 존재한다. 향후 ≪익징≫과 ≪六書尋源≫사이의 전승 관계 연구를 통하여 한국 문자학 연구의 양상과 그것이 중국과 차별되는 특징을 살펴보는 연구도 필요하리라 생각된다.