공적개발원조(ODA)의 배분 요인에 관한 선행연구에 따르면, 다수의 공여행위자는 수원국의 필요 또는 자국의 이익을 추구하기 위해 원조를 배분한다고 주장한다. 본 연구는 모든 수원국을 동일한 하나의 분석 단 위(unit)로 접근한 기존 연구와는 다르게, 아프리카 권역별 수원국이 차 지하는 상대적인 수준에 고려하여 원조 배분 요인을 고찰한다. 또한 아 프리카에 대한 전체 원조뿐 아니라 유상원조와 무상원조를 각각 구분하 여 배분 요인을 탐색한다는 점에서 선행연구와 차별적이다. 구체적으로 2012년부터 2021년까지 아프리카 수원국이 각 권역 내 차지하는 상대적 인 경제적, 정치적, 인도주의적, 거버넌스 수준이 원조 배분과 어떠한 관 계가 있는지를 살펴본다. 분석 결과, 수원국이 권역 내 다른 수원국에 비 해 경제적 수준이 낮을수록, 정치적 수준이 높을수록, 인도주의적 필요 수준이 낮을수록, 거버넌스 수준이 높을수록 원조를 더 많이 배분받는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 유상원조는 무상원조에 비해 수원국의 경제적 수준이 높을수록 더 많이 배분하는 점을 실증적으로 검증했다는 점에서 학술적 의의가 있다.

This study aimed to develop a questionnaire that is suitable for the resident-participatory ODA evaluation to minimize the bias and insufficient scientific rigor in the self-made questionnaire developed by evaluators. A modified Delphi survey was conducted twice with 16 ODA experts who had experience in international cooperative development in the fields of rural development, education, health, and poverty. Sixty-two questions were finally selected for resident-participatory ODA evaluation: 7 questions on relevance, 8 questions on efficiency, 9 questions on effectiveness, 11 questions on impact, questions on for sustainability, 4 questions on gender mainstreaming and environmental impact, and 17 questions on spillover effect on the community. A resident survey with the newly developed questionnaire will generate high-quality data that can empirically analyze the causal-effect relationship between ODA activities and performance, and community changes, and it can also contribute to the development of a quantitative ODA evaluation tool at a local level of recipient countries.

1. 본 연구의 목적은 한국 공여기관이 수행한 ODA 사업을 대상으로 수원국 주민에 의한 정량적 평가방법이 사후평가에 적용가능한지를 탐구함. 2. PLS-SEM 모형을 통해 OECD/DAC 5대 기준별 점수를 산출하였으며 추가로 ODA 성과가 주민 만족도와 공여국 이미지에 미치는 영향관계를 분석함. 3. 주민은 OECD/DAC 5대 기준 중 영향력에 대해 가장 낮은 점수를 부여하였으며 ODA 성과가 높을수록 주민 만족도와 공여국 이미지는 높아지는 것으로 나타남. 4. 본 연구를 통해 ODA 사업 사후평가에 주민참여형 정량적 평가의 적용가능성을 확인하였으며 본 평가방법은 공여국 전문가 주도의 평가방식을 보완하는 목적으로 그 유용성이 클 것으로 기대함.

South Korea is the only country that has switched its statue from a recipient of aid to a donor country that offers aid. After joined OECD/DAC in 2009, other countries are growing interest about ODA of Korea. In particular, food & agriculture cooperation initiative which is multilateral ODA of RDA in Korea is differentiated bilateral ODA. Therefore, other countries was growing interset about performance of ‘food & agriculture cooperation initiative’ Accordingly, purpose of this study is to find out the recipient countries economic effects of ‘Water management of rce project’ and ‘Cacao project’ among 3 project that are bring worked on by ‘Korea-Latin America Food & Agriculture Cooperation Initiative(KoLFACI)’ established in 2014. The best result obtained from KoLFACI projects was that project performance was significantly great despite small scale of budget invested. Economic ripple effect of water management of rice project was estimated as approximately USD 20,014,377 for upcoming 9 years in Peru and USD 6,081,463 for upcoming 9 years in Colombia. In Guatemala, economic ripple effect of training activities via cacao project was estimated USD 27,258 for project period(4 years). Also, the effect of fermentation and dry technology about Cacao in Colombia presume result. Estimation result, fermentation and dry technology effect was estimated USD 2,177,152 in Colombia upcoming 9 years. It means that KoLFACI project was technology development and distribution-centered, small scaled project with annual USD 20,000 ~ 30,000 budget, of which economic ripple effect was great in terms of low cost and high efficiency ODA project. We will search for ongoing methods that contribute to the role expansion of Korea and the agricultural development of the recipient country will be needed through the expansion and complementation of a low-cost and high efficiency ODA project such as the KoLFACI project.

The present study aims to provide an analytical framework for achieving aid and development effectiveness of agricultural cooperation with a demand-oriented perspective. This paper pays particular attention to categorize the stages of agricultural development of African recipients to identify demands for agricultural aid of the categorized groups. To do so, first of all, it establishes theoretical background to apply the demand-oriented concept and utilize the phase of agricultural development as an alternative for aid and development effectiveness. On the basis of the theoretical robustness, it conducts a series of analyses to categorize the African recipients by the development stages, incorporating factor analysis, cluster analysis and comparison between the present-future agricultural development levels. The findings propose analysis indicators for phase of agricultural development and clustered results including 18 countries of KAFACI members and priority countries in Africa. In addition to the practical application of the results, the methodological flow can be used as steps for sketching a future roadmap to construct the demand-oriented ODA(Official Development Assistance) plan. This paper also offers implications regarding ODA strategy of Korea in response to the phase of agricultural development and the aid demands.