본 연구는 맞벌이 부모의 일-가족 이점과 갈등이 부모의 양육 행동을 거쳐 자녀의 화용언어에 미치는 영향을 파악하고, 일-가족 이점과 갈등이 부모의 양 육 행동에 미치는 영향력에서 자기-상대방효과에 차이가 나는지를 비교 분석하 였다. 이를 위하여 한국아동패널 10차 조사자료에서 맞벌이 부모 604쌍과 자녀 의 데이터를 사용하였다. 기술통계와 상관분석은 SPSS.22, 자기-상대방 상호의 존모형(APIM)은 AMOS.28 통계 프로그램으로 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 첫째, 모 의 일-가정 이점과 갈등은 모의 양육 행동에, 모의 양육 행동은 아동의 화용언 어에 유의한 정적 영향을 미치지만, 모의 일-가정 이점과 갈등이 부의 양육 행 동에 미치는 영향은 유의하지 않았다. 둘째, 부의 일-가정 이점과 갈등은 부와 모의 양육 행동에 유의한 영향을 미쳤으나 부의 양육 행동은 아동의 화용언어에 미치는 영향이 유의하지 않았다. 셋째, 모는 부 보다 일-가정 이점과 갈등상황에 서 자신의 양육 행동에 대해 배우자보다 자기 자신의 영향력이 더 큰 것으로 나 타났다. 따라서 일-가정 양립 지원에 있어 부와 모의 관계성에 초점을 둔 세밀 화된 지원정책의 수립과 여성복지의 새로운 측면에 대한 고민이 필요하다.

The review of previous studies on interlanguage pragmatics reveals that they have been modelled on cross-cultural pragmatics. However, in order for interlanguage pragmatics to contribute in the area of second language acquisition, it should examine how L2 pragmatic competence develops as L2 linguistic competence increases. Therefore, interlanguage pragmatics studies should be modelled on acquisitional pragmatics. As an effort to explore developmental features of pragmatic competence by linguistic proficiency, this study investigated the speech act behaviors of three linguistically distinctive groups. A total of 159 English learners, which consisted of high school 1st and 2nd graders, university freshmen, and university seniors, participated in this study. Their written responses to the 7 situations in the Discourse Completion Test (DCT) were analyzed in terms of response length, vocabulary, request forms, and the use of please. The three groups showed different behavioral patterns in the realization of requests and complaints, utilizing different linguistic strategies to be responsive to the social factors. For future research, expanding learner population to include very low and high level learners, developing a new research tool other than DCT, a more systematic grouping by linguistic proficiency were suggested.

This study aims to show that 2nd person pronouns in English and Korean do not cover the grammatical category only. They show spatio-temporal indications of discourse covering extralinguistic categories such as politeness, respect, intimacy, solidarity, all of them social, pragmatic components. Our study also reveals the fact that both languages have employed honorific/common nominal expressions as a last resort to fill the blank caused by the inappropriateness of the pronoun. Another fact we discovered is that Korean has a more complicated hierarchy for 2nd person pronouns than English does, which is a reflect of strong/weak social hierarchy in both cultures.

Oh, Myung-Ki. 2000. A Pragmatic Analysis of Metalinguistic Negation Phenomena. Studies in Modern Grammar 19, 171-190. This paper is an attempt to show that metalinguistic negation connected with denying the appropriateness of a means of expression does not operate upon the semantic content of the sentence, but upon the manner in which the sentence is expressed. We will prove, through the examination of the well-known thirteen utterances, that this negation can indeed operate on any aspect of the utterances and on a conversational implicature as well. In order to understand the notion of metalinguistic negation, we`ll discuss the two distinctions that can be made regarding the use of negation, namely descriptive vs. metalinguistic negation and initiative vs. reactive negation, in the sense of Horn (1985, 1989) and Foolen (1991), respectively. On the basis of the two distinctions regarding the two uses of `not`, we will argue that the material falling within the scope of the metalinguistic negation is `mentioned` rather than `used`. And we`ll also argue that the metalinguistic negation under the relationship between the scalar operators such as `three`/`four` and `some`/`all` is acting on a conversational implicature associated with the pragmatic aspects.