진해만 해역은 태풍 내습 시에 우리나라 남동권 해역의 주요 태풍 피항지로 이용되고 있다. 하지만 태풍 내습 시 진해만 내 선박이 폭주하고 주묘가 다수 발생하는 등 해양사고 발생 가능성이 존재한다. 본 논문은 태풍 내습 시 진해만 피항지에 대해 안전 확보 및 효율적으로 관리할 수 있는 방안을 해당 해역의 VTS 관제사로부터 도출하고, 이를 선박 운항자에게 AHP 기법을 통하여 상대적 중요 도를 도출하여 관리자와 이용자 의견이 반영된 안전대책을 제시하였다. AHP 설문조사를 위한 안전 대책 요소를 선정하기 위하여 진해만 내 태풍 내습 시 VTS 관제사의 대응 조치 평가 내용에 대해 분석하였다. 선정된 안전대책 요소를 기반으로 설문조사를 실시한 결과, 선정 된 요소에 대해 선박 운항자는 선박의 안전을 효율적 관리보다 약 2배 이상 중요하게 생각하며, 종합적으로 피항선 관리, 정박구역 관리, 피항정보 관리, 규정 및 지침 마련, 시스템 장비 개선, 교육 및 홍보·알림 활동 순으로 중요하게 고려함을 파악하였다. 본 논문에서 식별된 방안 및 상대적 중요도를 통해서 진해만 태풍 피항지를 안전하고 효율적으로 관리하는 기반이 될 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

This study is conducted to suggest ways to mitigate the mismatch phenomenon between job seekers who want to find right company for themselves and companies looking for appropriate new employees. For this purpose, this study improves the company assessment framework reflecting job seekers interests by using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. The improved evaluation framework is a three-level hierarchical structure, where there are 4 groups at the top level, 12 factors at the intermediate level and 36 indexes at the bottom level. For the empirical analysis of the applicants preferences based on the improved model, a survey for F-AHP analysis is carried out to university students and then priorities of components in the evaluation model are calculated. Moreover, the differences of priority of the company assessment framework are analyzed for different genders, college years, and major divisions. The results show that job seekers’ most concerning factors are wages, stability, working environments, and labor deal, which are ranked highly in this order and the differences in preferences for each type of job seekers (genders, college years, and major divisions) are obvious. The results also show that the male prefers wages to environment, on the other hand female does working environment to wages.

The objective of this study is to develop an evaluation model for the National highway risky areas. Thus, for the purposes of doing this, National highway risky area evaluated targeting to provide determination ranking and suggesting rival-superiority factors as well as under-inferiority factors in ten National highway risky areas. This study developed for modules of risky areas evaluation, using fuzzy set theory and analytic hierarchy process for evaluation model of National highway risky area in transport environment. The preceding studies assess risk analysis through analysis of causal relationships by National highway safety sector not only handles rating scale development suitable for assessment area by referring to accident frequency model but also geometric structures model. As result of this study, this model of Fuzzy Ahp Risk Analysis (FARA) apply for programmable design in real time processing through easily derive strategy for improvement activities to provide a decision-making effectively. Furthermore, this study contributes frame for improvements of National highway construction for renovation's priority strategy as well as future's policy schemes.

Currently in the drought evaluation, which is a supplier-oriented standard that applies storage rates of reservoirs, evaluation for users that use agricultural water is not done. Therefore, this study established drought evaluation items for drought evaluation based on farmers' judgement, conducted a survey on farmers and experts, compared and analyzed weighted value between two groups, and then classified the evaluation standards per each evaluation item. The agricultural drought evaluation items are 5 major items of water supply lapse rate, agricultural weather, agricultural irrigation facility, crop and soil, and 12 subsections for regional characteristics and opinions of consumers that use water to be reflected. The result of analyzing weighted value of farmers and experts' major items shows that farmers is agricultural irrigation facility(0.219), water supply lapse rate(0.211), agricultural weather(0.204), crop(0.183) and soil(0.183). Experts is agricultural weather(0.297), agricultural irrigation facility(0.202), water supply lapse rate(0.189), crop(0.162) and soil(0.150), which displays difference between the two groups. The agricultural drought criteria standards are established based on precedent studies and cases, and grades of evaluation items are 1st grade(extreme stage), 2nd grade(warning stage), 3rd grade(alert stage) and 4th grade(attention stage). The above analysis per each consumer-oriented agricultural drought evaluation item and the analysis on the standards of evaluation grades are expected to be used as a basic resource for establishing agriculture drought policy and selecting drought area in the future.

In this study, weight of assessment items for rock and soil slopes is deducted using AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process). And also, weight of each performance for final evaluation is analyzed. As a result, tension crack and ground deformation make up a large proportion in all slopes, and weight of each performance based on the location of the slope does not show a big difference.

This study was performed to decide weight of an objective evaluation factors so optimized for small reservoirs and reservoirs that operators may survey their status and identify relevant risk factors in a timely way. In this study, evaluation factors were determined based on the expert panel results followed by the brain storming process. The selected evaluation factors were implemented on the formulation of hierarchy and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique were used to determine weight factors based on the expert survey results. It is expected that the use of the proposed weight will contribute to the more systematic and efficient safety management of small reservoirs to prevent their failures.

본 연구에서는 목포항의 요트산업 운영과 개발에 관한 평가를 위한 평가모델을 제안하고자 한다. 이러한 평가를 위해 본 연구에서 제안한 모델은 SWOT와 AHP법을 통합한 것이다. 본 연구에서는 평가를 위해 ISM법에 의해 평가요소를 구조화한다. 그리고 계층구조는 5단계이며 3단계부터는 SWOT법이 적용된다. 또한 평가를 위해 SWOT법에서 O, T는 외부적요소고, O, T는 외부적 요소로 구분하였다. 또한 개발 및 운영의 관점은 경제적인 관점과 해양 레져관광 개발의 두 관점을 고려하였다. 개발 및 운영주체는 제3섹터 민간과 지자체로 구분하였다. 그 결과 강점과 기회가 우선순위가 높게 나타났고 제3섹터에 의한 개발과 운영이 선호되는 것으로 나타났다.