본 연구는 장애인 고용 비의무 기업 고용주의 장애인식과 사회적 책임 과의 관계에서 장애인 인식개선 교육 효과의 조절효과를 검증하기 위한 목적이 있다. 본 연구는 2021 장애인 고용기업체 고용실태조사를 근거로 장애인 고용 비의무 기업 고용주로 50인 미만 기업 고용주 359명을 대 상으로 하였고, 통계분석은 SPSS 26.0 프로그램과 jamovi 2.5.22로 하 였다. 연구결과 첫째, 장애인 고용 비의무 기업 고용주의 장애인식이 사 회적 책임을 높이는 것으로 확인되었다. 둘째, 장애인 인식개선 교육 효 과가 사회적 책임을 높이는 것으로 확인되었다. 셋째, 장애인 고용 비의 무 기업 고용주의 장애인식과 사회적 책임과의 관계에서 장애인 인식개 선 교육 효과가 이를 조절하는 것으로 확인되었다. 위의 연구결과를 중 심으로 장애인 고용 비의무 기업 고용주의 장애인식 증진과 사회적 책임 을 높이는 실천적 방안을 제시하였다.

The purpose of this study is to explore relationships between company’s characteristics, the status of business ethics education, employee perceptions of corporate business ethics, and organizational performance. A total of 161 small- and medium-sized apparel companies participated in a survey and data was analyzed using cross-tabulation, ANOVA, and SPSS PROCESS. The results show that, larger companies involved with export are more likely to implement business ethics education, whereas no company characteristic is associated with perceptions of corporate business ethics. Furthermore, apparel companies that implemented or planned to implement business ethics education, have employees with more positive perceptions of corporate business ethics and better organizational performance than fashion companies that have no plan to implement such education. In addition, companies in the apparel sector with higher employee perceptions of corporate business ethics had greater organizational performance than apparel companies with lower employee perceptions of corporate business ethics. This study emphasizes the need to implement business ethics education to enhance employee perceptions of company business ethics, which in turn promotes organizational performance. It is expected that the results of this study will positively affect the development and expansion of business ethics education programs and contribute to the foundation of knowledge for business ethics education for fashion companies.

본 연구는 기업 관리자의 코칭리더십과 조직구성원의 문제해결능력 및 대인관계능력간의 구조모형의 타당성과 코칭리더십과 문제해결능력이 대인관계능력에 미치는 경로에 따른 영향력을 규명하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 연구를 수행하였다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 국내 주요 대기업에서 근무하는 사무/관리직 492명을 대상으로 실증연구를 실시하였다. 이러한 분석을 위한 통계처리에는 SPSS와 AMOS 통계프로그램이 사용되었다. 연구결과 코칭리더십은 문제해결능력에 직접적인 영향을 미치고 문제해결능력을 매개로 대인관계능 력에 간접적인 영향을 미친다는 구조모형은 타당한 것으로 밝혀졌다. 그리고 기업 관리자의 코칭리더십 과 조직구성원의 문제해결능력이 다양한 구조적 경로를 통하여 조직구성원의 대인관계능력 향상에 긍정 적인 기여를 하는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 즉, 직무기반 코칭리더십과 관계기반 코칭리더십 모두가 문제해결능 력 향상에 긍정적인 기여를 하고, 이중 관계기반 코칭리더십이 직무기반 코칭리더십보다 문제해결능력 에 더 큰 영향을 미치고, 코칭리더십이 조직구성원의 문제해결능력을 매개로 대인관계능력 향상에 긍정 적인 기여를 하는 것으로 확인되었다.

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to conduct a monitoring study on the learning process of e-learning contents. This study has two research objectives. First, by conducting monitoring research on the learning process, we aim to explore the implications for content development that reflects future student needs. Second, we want to collect empirical basic data on the estimation of appropriate amount of learning. Research design, data, and methodology – This study is a case study of learner's learning process in e-learning. After completion of the study, an in–depth interview was made after conducting a test to measure the total amount of cognitive load and the level of engagement that occurred during the learning process. The tool used to measure cognitive load is NASA-TLX, a subjective cognitive load measurement method. In the monitoring process, we observe external phenomena such as page movement and mouse movement path, and identify cognitive activities such as Think-Aloud technique. Results – In the total of three research subjects, the two courses showed excess learning time compared to the learning time, and one course showed less learning time than the learning time. This gives the following implications for content development. First, it is necessary to consider the importance of selecting the target and contents level according to the level of the subject. Second, it is necessary to design the learner participation activity that meets the learning goal level and to calculate the appropriate time accordingly. Third, it is necessary to design appropriate learning support strategy according to the learning task. This should be considered in designing lessons. Fourth, it is necessary to revitalize contents design centered on learning activities such as simulation. Conclusions - The implications of the examination system are as follows. First, it can be confirmed that there is difficulty in calculating the amount of learning centered on learning time and securing objective objectivity. Second, it can be seen that there are various variables affecting the actual learning time in addition to the content amount. Third, there is a need for reviewing the system of examination of learning amount centered on 'learning time'.

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to explore the introduction and activation of smart training for the effective training of vocational ability development of companies in the 4th industrial revolution era, we analyze the present status of smart training introduction and related difficulties and propose concrete activation plan. Research design, data, and methodology – Through the online survey, we tried to confirm the recognition of corporate about smart training. Questionnaires include what are the benefits, expectations, and difficulties of smart training, etc. The survey was conducted from August 21, 2017 to September 4, 2017. A total of 69 companies participated in the questionnaire. The questionnaire results were analyzed through frequency analysis and contents analysis. Based on the results of the questionnaire, we found out the cause of inhibition of smart training activation and suggested activation strategies. Results – The main reason for the provision of smart training is the expectation of the training performance and the recognition that it is possible to provide training in a flexible manner. The effectiveness of smart training operation was evaluated as a high level of contribution to the development of creative training course and the capacity of training institute. As a result of checking factors that hinders the activation of smart training, the most important reason is that the time and cost burden of the training institutes is excessive. The lack of expertise in the design of smart training courses and the burden of employers and trainees. Conclusions – In order to activate smart training, it is necessary to find solutions to the obstacles at the internal or external level of training institutions. The internal barriers to the training organization are lack of internal competence for preparation and course management. In this regard, we need to consider providing consulting, best practices or guidance in the process of designing and operating smart training. On the other hand, as an external obstacle factor, it is necessary to provide incentives to participate in smart training. In addition, further research is needed on strategies that can lead to participation in smart training from the viewpoint of employers and learners.