The Korean administration assumed that the amount of low and medium level waste generated during the decommissioning of nuclear facilities in Korea was 14,500 drums (based on 200 L) and designed the LILW repository accordingly. Accordingly, it is necessary to separate the nuclear power plant decommissioning waste into clearance waste by mobilizing means such as decontamination and cutting as much as possible, and to deregulate it together with non-radioactive waste. As a result, clearance waste and non-radioactive waste are dominated by concrete and metal, and it is necessary to evaluate how to recycle them. Many existing studies have conducted research on each recycling method, and accordingly, it can be judged that the technological maturity is sufficient. Accordingly, we would like to propose a method for comprehensive management and evaluation of concrete. By applying the decision matrix proposed in IAEA TRS No. 401, it will be possible to compare the 5 factors (cost, technical feasibility, risk, availability of disposal, and full cycle impact). However, in the case of concrete, if the existing construction waste recycling methodologies are fully used, the technical feasibility can be considered equal. Therefore, it was judged that it would be good to introduce the aspect of public acceptance as an evaluation item instead of technical feasibility. The amount of waste that can be generated when decommission a nuclear power plant is only insignificant compared to the total amount of waste concrete that is generated during the year. Accordingly, one option is to fully integrate the waste concrete recycling system and utilize it for road construction. Next, it is possible to suggest the option of recycling in the construction of shields in the nuclear industry, as suggested in previous studies, and the method of using it as a backfill material such as for a decommissioned NPP site or other sites. As an example, and a draft stage, this study was evaluated based on existing studies after all options were equally weighted. When the profit and loss was evaluated in a way that a maximum of 5 points were given to each option, the case of using it as a backfill in various applications was evaluated as the best option. Unlimited recycling, such as road construction, was evaluated to be highly damaging in terms of public acceptance.

Deep geological disposal (DGD) of spent nuclear fuels (SNF) at 500 m–1 km depth has been the mainly researched as SNF disposal method, but with the recent drilling technology development, interest in deep borehole disposal (DBD) at 5 km depth is increasing. In DBD, up to 40SNF canisters are disposed of in a borehole with a diameter of about 50 cm, and SNF is disposed of at a depth of 2–5 km underground. DBD has the advantage of minimizing the disposal area and safely isolating highlevel waste from the ecosystem. Recently, due to an increasing necessity of developing an efficient alternative disposal system compared to DGD domestically, technological development for DBD has begun. In this paper, the research status of canister operation technology and plans for DBD demonstration tests, which subjects are being studied in the project of developing a safety-enhancing high-efficiency disposal system, are introduced. The canister operation technology for DBD can be divided into connection device development and operation technology. The developing connection device, emplacing and retrieving canisters in borehole, adopted the concept of a wedge thus making replacement equipment at the surface unnecessary. The new connection device has the advantage of being well applied with emplacement facilities only by simple mechanical operation. The technology of operating a connection device in DBD can be divided into drill pipe, coiled tubing, free-drop, and wireline. The drill pipe is a proven method in the oil industry, but requiring huge surface equipment. The coiled tubing method uses a flexible tube and shares disadvantages as the drill pipe. The free-drop is a convenient method of dropping canister into a borehole, but has a weakness in irretrievability in an accident. Finally, the wireline method can be operational on a small scale using hydraulic cranes, but the number of operated canisters at once is limited. The test facility through which the connection device is to be tested consists of dummy canister, borehole, lifting part, monitoring part, and connecting device. The canister weight is determined according to the emplacement operation unit. The lifting part will be composed following wireline consisting of a crane, a wire and a winding system. The monitoring part will consist of an external monitoring system for hoists and trolleys, and an internal monitoring system for the connection device’s location, pressure, and speed. In this project, a demonstration test will be conducted in a borehole with 1km depth, 10 cm diameter provided by KAERI to verify operation in the actual drilling environment after design improvement of the connecting device. If a problem is found through the demonstration test, the problem will be improved, and an improved connection device will be tested to an extended borehole with a 2 km depth, 40 cm diameter.