Notre travail a pour objectif l'amélioration des conditions d'enseignement-apprentissage du FLE (Français Langue Etrangère) comme matière optionnelle en contexte universitaire coréen, mettant l'accent sur l'importance des interactions entre apprenants. Nous postulons que l'usage des dispositifs numériques donnent des pistes intéressantes afin de résoudre des obstacles auxquels les étudiants se confrontent lors de leur apprentissage du français en présentiel. Nous montrons d'abord l'évolution de la méthodologie des langues étrangères en fonction de celle du paradigme de l'éducation. Nous allons ensuite tenter de définir le dispositif numérique pour l'enseignementapprentissage des langues et de présenter quelques exemples d'utilisation en milieu universitaire. Afin de mieux comprendre l'état actuel du champ pédagogique pratique, nous avons mené une enquête sur les besoins concrets des apprenants pour l'apprentissage du français favorable et satisfaisant à leur guise. 100 étudiants de deux universités différentes qui suivent le cours de français comme matière optionnelle ont participé à cette enquête. Ce travail précise ainsi l'intérêt de l'usage des dispositifs numériques dans le but de développer différentes compétences dont les apprenants ont besoin pour être “acteurs sociaux” dans une perspective actionnelle.

“Action-oriented Approach (AA)” as a new teaching method has taken an important role in teaching and learning of French Education during past 10 years. However, even though the new teaching method is very welcome for educators, now it is the time that we have to consider whether the key principle and fundamental notion of this approach is suitable for our language education environments and is theoretically appropriate for education. For that, it is necessary that we have to carefully examine this “Action-oriented Approach” from two points of views. First of all, from the angle of foreign language education, we need to verify whether this new approach could be appropriately applied in teaching and learning of Korean foreign language education or not. Secondly, from a societal perspective, we need to examine how this method, considering language education as everyday life itself, can handle some critical perspectives in the point of “status in quo” of “AA”. It has been criticized that language education as everyday life itself can make learners in everyday life to unconsciously acquire maintaining the ‘status quo’ during actions such as “educational inequality”. It is expected that this kind of examination will suggest us an improved way of “AA” for more effective and appropriate practice of French Education, and will give us an opportunity to think about the better way of teaching and learning model by “AA” in Korea.

The purpose of this paper is to examine the theoretical backgroud of a phraseo-didactics in French as Foreign Language and to present concrete ways to develop it in an effective way. The teaching methodology for french phraseolgy is very critical to improve one’s communicative competence among Korean learners. In this regard, this article raised the following 4 issues: 1) To distinguish the type of french phraseology. 2) To examine the status of phraseology in Common European Framework of Reference. 3) To investigate components of phraseology which are divided into three parts: sociocultural component, linguistic component, pragmatic component. 4) To set up some issues for the teaching of french phraseology in Korean context. For an effective teaching, this paper need to more carefully consider the teaching lists, rages, time and various methods of french phraseological expressions.