This study investigates the possibility of broadening Korean terminology research by examining Quebecois terminology research under the “Quebecois School,” which shows unique academic characteristics. Specifically, under the argument that Quebecois terminology qualifies as socioterminology, three areas that can be referenced in future Korean terminology research were analyzed: terminotics, ad hoc terminology, and terminometry. Accordingly, this study presents three tasks for future Korean terminology research: integration of neighborhood studies, user-centered study, and follow-up study on terminology development. Since 1998, Korean terminology has developed both in theory and practice. However, in order to further elevate the current terminology, active academic exchanges at the world level are required. The present study is in line with this goal, and it is expected that various efforts to develop terminology research will eventually lead to “Korean School” with original characteristics.

The standardization of the veterinary terms carried out so that Japanese or Chinese terms established in the Japanese Emperor Era modified into Korean character (Hangeul). The standardization of the terminology has been performed in veterinary medicine as well as various fields of study such as medicine, food sciences, biology, chemistry etc. The most appropriate terms were selected according to ‘the principle of establishment on veterinary medical terminology’ following a comparison between veterinary medical and medical terminology, and references with various dictionaries and specialty publications. Thereafter, the opinions of various organizations and academies on the selected terms were converged through the public hearing. The standardization of the veterinary terms has made progress, for example the publication of ‘Veterinary Anatomical Terminology (2013)’, which is Korean version of NAV/NEV. The Korean-English terms for veterinary medicine, which has contained approximately 46,900 terms, published at 2018. Veterinary terms are widely related with not only medicine and pharmacology but also with various fields of the society including livestock industry, food industry and quarantine. Therefore, the discretion should be required in the selecting appropriate Korean veterinary terms. The standardization of the veterinary terms should be progress in the regularly revision in a timely manner.

목적 : 본 연구는 작업치료 임상용어체계 표준화를 위한 후속 연구로 작업치료 기록의 분류 및 세부치료 행 위에 대해 용어를 확립한 후, 전문가 자문을 통해 적용 가능성을 파악하고 타당성을 검증하여 한국형 의 료기관 중심 작업치료기록 표준용어를 개발하고자 실시하였다. 연구방법 : 작업치료사들이 근무하는 의료 기관을 대상으로 지역별, 병원종별, 사례별 임상에서의 작업치료 행위 기록현황 결과를 기반으로 국제 기능, 장애 및 건강에 대한 분류(International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; ICF)와 작업치료 실행체계(Occupational Therapy Practice Framework; OTPF)를 근거로 5단계의 전문가 검토를 실시하였고 타당도 검증은 내용타당도 지수를 산 출하였다. 결과 : 한국형 의료기관 중심 작업치료기록 9개의 대분류는 감각치료, 지각치료, 인지치료, 신경근ㆍ골격계 치료, 연하치료, 활동 및 참여–이동 및 움직임, 활동 및 참여–기본적 일상생활활동, 활동 및 참여–수단적 일상생활활동, 활동 및 참여–그 밖의 작업치료로 구성되었다. 내용타당도 검증결과 임상 작업치료 용어 에 대한 전체 내용타당도 지수는 .89로 높게 나타났다. 결론 : 향후 한국형 의료기관 중심 작업치료기록 표준용어를 활용하여 활동 및 참여 중심의 작업치료 문서 화가 가능해지고, 작업치료기록 표준용어의 사용빈도 통계 자료를 활용하여 작업치료 보험수가 개발 및 확대를 위한 근거 자료로 활용될 것을 기대하는 바이다.

Although scholarly terminology should have clear meanings as signs, Korean pagoda terminology has become jargon and is creating difficulties in communicating meanings which are far from the originally intended meanings; this terminology is sometimes notated in dead language, meaning old Chinese characters, or Japanese styled Chinese characters. Nobody has asked questions on the terminology itself which has long been commonly used for a century, since the Japanese-ruling period. One of the main reasons for this error is that the Indian Buddhist scriptures in Sanskrit has been translated into Chinese with vague understanding of form and meaning of stupa since 3rd Century A.D. On the other hand, the English-language terminology, already built by Indology scholars since the beginning of the 20th century, consists of easier language and clearer meanings. This paper examines misunderstanding and mistranslation of the original Indian stupa terms and suggests new terminology in current, easier language.