이 연구는 범죄자를 대상으로 특수한 작업환경에서 직무를 수행해야하는 교정공무원과 경찰공무원을 대상으로 Maslow의 욕구단계이론을 토대로 직무만족도를 비교 분석해 보고, 그 결과를 토대로 정책적 제언을 강구하는데 목적을 두었다. 조사결과 경찰공무원은 교정공무원 보다 직무에 대한 안전성, 존중감, 성취감을 더 많이 느끼는데 반해, 교정공무원은 경찰공무원 보다 직무에 대한 안 정성 및 소속감 영역에서 세부항목에서만 만족도가 높은 것으로 나타나, 전반적 으로 교정공무원이 경찰공무원보다 직무만족도가 낮은 것을 알 수 있었다. 이 러한 연구결과를 바탕으로 다음과 같은 정책적 제언을 강구하였다. 첫째, 교정공무원의 직무에 대한 안전성을 높이기 위해서 계구사용에 관한 합리적인 기준이 보다 명확하게 법률상 규정되어야 하고, 수용자들을 제어할 수 있도록 가석방 심의에 교정공무원의 평가가 직접적으로 영향을 끼칠 수 있도록 해야 한다. 그리고 경찰에게 실시하고 있는 직무환경 특성을 반영한 차별화된 '맞춤형 복지 제도'를 교정환경에도 적용시킬 수 있도록 해야 한다. 둘째, 교정공무원의 존중 감을 높이기 위해 교정행정 역시 경찰에서 시행하고 있는 다양한 홍보시스템 구 축 및 뉴미디어 활용 등의 전략적인 홍보활동이 필요하다. 셋째, 교정공무원의 성취감 향상을 위하여 교정공무원 개인에게 필요한 다양한 교육훈련 프로그램 개발해야한다. 더불어 현재 실시하고 있는 장․단기 해외연수 프로그램을 확 대․실시하여 보다 선진적인 교정제도를 우리 실정에 맞게 도입함으로써, 교정 행정의 선진화를 이룰 수 있도록 해야 한다.

The purpose of this study is to analyse the job-satisfaction of police officer. The subjects of this study are selected by convenience sampling of random sampling method. The population is male and female incumbent police officers in Seoul and Gyeonggi province. The 347 cases are used to analyse the job-satisfaction among 400 police officers who answer the question. The Jod-Satisfaction Survey(Choi, 2001) are used for collecting data. In consequence of and 4 sub-factors(job-satisfaction) are found. Cronbach's alpha coefficient revealed .058~.804, .846~.871, respectively. For the statistical analysis, SPSS version 12.0 are utilized. The verification of research hypothesis are conducted by T-test, ANOVA, correlation, and multiple-regression. The significance level of all tests are set at .05. The findings of this study can be summarized as follows: Based on the demographic factors, the differences in life-style among police officers are identified. There is significant differences in gender and ages on individualism and accomplishment, in marital status on individualism and fashion-pursuing, and in income level on fashion-pursuing and accomplishment. There is also significant differences in education, religion, position and service period on accomplishment, individualism and fashion-pursuing.

I think the spirit of the introduction of the testimony system of investigators, is in order to prevent, it is possible, among other things, what happens to overturn sentence unfair of witness or defendant, the absurd result, to deal effectively with this. If you look at the relevant case law of the testimony system after the introduction of the investigators, the main material used to determine the presence or absence of special guarantees of trustworthiness associated with the testimony of investigators. If there is participants at the time, it is possible to mention his statement, a description of statement was created in the course of the investigation. Therefore, in order to be recognized innocuously the special guarantees of trustworthiness from the perspective of law enforcement, it or enlist a person or trusted counsel in the course of the investigation, to record the all process of investigation is most preferred and counsel or if the video recording research and participation of people with a trust relationship has not been made, and that along with the testimony itself of investigators, will be discussed in a comprehensive manner, such as the description of the written statement and assertion of the accused, the presence or absence of special guarantees of trustworthiness, it is necessary to judge. And, by notifying explicitly whether the certification of special guarantees of trustworthiness associated with the testimony of the investigator in the course of the trial, so as to additional proof activities for inspection, by this, the court, a sufficient psychological it is necessary while securing the article must determine the adoption of evidence.