Medical cyclotrons have been used for dedicated medical of commercial applications such as positron emission tomography (PET) for the past tens of years. These cyclotron facilities have produced positron-emitting radionuclides (i.e. 11C, 13N, 15O, 18F, etc.). Among them, 18F, produced by 18O(p,n)18F reaction is the most widely used which has longer half-life (around 110 m) and lower energy of emitted positrons (around 0.63 MeV). Secondary neutrons produced during 18O(p,n)18F reaction could cause neutron activation of structures, systems, and components of cyclotron facilities. Therefore, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) had addressed that during the operation of cyclotrons, concrete walls become radioactive over time and this radioactivity needs to be characterized for planning of the facility decommissioning. Moreover, several prior studies had estimated the neutron activation and levels of radioactivity of concrete wall of cyclotron facilities. Although those studies assessed the neutron activation of actual cyclotron facilities, however, the purpose of assessment was only for decommissioning each individual facility. Also, the assumptions, conditions or insights of conclusion may be limited to each individual case. For these reasons, this study focused on analysis of effects of major factors (e.g. concrete type, impurity contents of structural materials, etc.) about neutron activation of cyclotron facilities. In this study, the well-known methodology of neutron activation estimation was established and neutron activation products of concrete wall of cyclotron vault was calculated. Also, sensitivity analyses were conducted to figure out the effects of major factors of neutron activation and production of radioactive wastes during decommissioning of the facility. The methodology and results were validated by two steps: comparing with prior studies and comparing with another computer code. Concrete type did not affect that the decision of level of radioactivity waste criteria. Because of relatively longer half-lives, impurity contents of structural materials especially Co and Eu were turned out one of the most important factors for planning the facility decommissioning. It is hard to simply figure out the radioactivity levels of cyclotron facilities, however, rough predictions of minimum period for decay-in-storage as radioactive waste management can be possible with using information of thermal neutron spectra and major impurity nuclides (e.g. 59Co, 151Eu and 153Eu) for minimization of radioactive waste production and relief of charge of radioactive waste management.

Important medical radionuclides for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) are producing using cyclotrons. There are about 1,200 PET cyclotrons operated in 95 countries based upon IAEA database (2020). Besides, including PET cyclotrons, demands for particle accelerators are continuously increasing. In Korea, about 40 PET cyclotrons are in operating phases (2020). Considering design lifetime (about 30-40 years) and actual operating duration (about 20-30 years) of cyclotrons, there will be demands for decommissioning cyclotron facilities in the near future. PET cyclotron produces radionuclides by irradiating accelerated charged particles to the targets. During this phase, nuclear reactions (18O(p,n)18F etc.) produce secondary neutrons which induce neutron activation of accelerator itself as well as surrounding infrastructures (the ancillary subsystems, peripheral equipment, concrete walls etc.). Generally, experienced cyclotron personnel prefer an unshielded cyclotron because of the repair and maintenance time. In unshielded cyclotron, water cooling systems, air compressor, and other equipment and structures could be existed for operating purposes. Almost all the equipment and structures are consisted of steel, and these affect neutron distribution in vault especially thermal neutron on the concrete wall. In addition, most of them can be classified as very low level radioactive wastes by Nuclear Safety and Security notice (NSSC Notice No. 2020-6). However, few studies were estimating radioactivity concentrations (Bq/g) of surrounding structures using mathematical calculation/simulation codes, and they were not evaluating the effect of surrounding structures on neutron distribution. In this study, by using computational neutron transport code (MCNP 6.2), and source term calculation code (FISPACT- II), we evaluated effect of the interaction between surrounding structures (including surrounding equipment) and secondary neutrons. Discrepancies of activation distribution on/in concrete wall will be occur depending on thickness of structure, distance between structures and walls, and consideration of interaction between structures and neutrons. Throughout this study, we could find that the influence of those structures can affect neutron distribution in concrete walls even if, thickness of the structure was small. For estimating activation distribution in unshielded cyclotron vault more precisely, not only considering cyclotron components and geometry of target, but also, considering surrounding structures will be much more helpful.