본 과업은 핵심적인 농촌자원이자 경관생태자원인 마을숲 및 주변의 시설을 활용하여 지역 및 마을의 경관생태적 복원 및 공동체성 회복을 위한 경관계획적 대안을 제시하는 것을 그 목적으로 하고 있다. 대상지는 장수군 장수읍에 위치한 노하숲으로, 현재 이곳을 포함한 장수읍 일원은 2017년부터 농촌중심지 활성화사업 선도지구사업이 활발히 진행 중에 있다. 계획의 비전 및 방향을 “사람과 숲이 어우러진 행복공감 커뮤니티 숲 조성”로 설정하였으며, 훼손되어온 노하숲의 생태적 가치를 보전하면서도 주민 활용성을 극대화할 수 있도록 계획하였다. 장수군 노인/장애인복지관, 행복나눔센터(계획) 등 주변시설의 앞마당 공간을 제공하여 휴게, 놀이, 여가 등 다양한 활동을 수행할 수 있도록 하며, 동선계획의 경우 무장애 순환형 동선을 구축하여 다양한 계층의 이용 편의성을 향상시키며, 동선계획으로 주 진출입부와 단절된 내부동선을 연결하였으며, 인접한 시설들과의 접근성을 향상시켰다. 기본 구상으로 첫째, UNESCO MAB의 기준에 따라 핵심구역은 생태숲으로, 완충구역은 정원숲을 그리고 협력(전이)구역은 피크닉숲으로 조성 및 유지·관리하고자 한다. 둘째 남동, 북서측에 진입마당을 설치하여 개방감을 확보하고 진입인지성과 편의성을 증진한다. 셋째, 나무놀이터, 그늘쉼터를 조성하여 아이들과 젊은 엄마들의 휴게, 놀이 및 정보공유의 공간으로 활용하도록 한다. 기본구상에 따른 주요 공간은 진입마당, 정원쉼터, 건강쉼터, 숲학습장 및 피크닉숲 등으로 구성하였다.

This purpose of this study was to investigate the perception and participation satisfaction of residents who participated in the rural landscape improvement project in Geumsan. The projects were conducted in three villages of Geumsan in 2018 and total 96 residents had participated. The results of the questionnaire survey on the participants showed that they usually have interests in community activities and actively participated. As a result of analyzing factors related to the change of residents' perceptions and satisfaction. It was found that there was significant difference in perception and satisfaction according to frequency of participation, not demographic factors. It is interesting that active interaction among residents during the projects and satisfaction on process are important factor for overall project satisfaction. For successful rural landscape improvement projects, it is necessary to encourage and support interaction and communication among residents. In addition, more various programs need to be developed to foster residents’ attachment and sense of community.

This study aims to identify more reasonable and efficient development plans to engage local university students in landscape improvement projects in rural areas. To survey university students, residents, administrators and experts involved in such projects on important considerations in this regard, SWOT analysis was employed to identify important factors, followed by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate their relative importance, identify problems and suggest implications for improvement. The results are summarized as follows: the relative importance of the SWOT group was in the order of opportunity, strength, threat, and weakness. For each SWOT factor, the relative importance of strengths was in the order of students’ aspiration and passion, availability of creative ideas and designs, and improved attachment to their community. The relative importance of weaknesses was in the order of the lack of spontaneous participation of residents, short preparation periods and insufficient budgets, and the lack of experience in similar projects. The relative importance of opportunities was in the order of young students’ activity itself being a boost factor to the community, students’ endeavors arising a consensus among residents, and students feeling a sense of duty as representatives of their school. The relative importance of threats was in the order of projects being one-shot, temporary events, immaturity, and differences in preferences between older and younger generations. To draw an overall ranking of the sub-factors evaluated, the overall relative importance of the decision-making factors was evaluated. Among the sub-factors for each SWOT group, young students’ activity itself being a boost factor to the community as an opportunity factor was shown to be the most important, while the lack of experience in similar projects was shown to be the least important as administrators and experts made appropriate interventions in each stage.

The purpose of this study is to assess residents' perception of the revitalization projects of the rural center and to evaluate their views of the projects' importance and their levels of satisfaction with how they have been carried out. In this study, we measured the residents' perceptions and preferences regarding these projects by using Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA). Results showed that residents' perceptions and satisfaction were the highest for the projects providing welfare facilities, even though this project has little relevance to the overall project goal. Residents were dissatisfied with construction projects such as the building of cultural facilities and urban parks, even while recognizing their importance. It is necessary to establish what problem the people perceive and to manage them appropriately. Next, the residents did not appreciate the community empowerment projects, nor did they evaluate the contents of the program positively. It can therefore be seen that the community empowerment projects have not been carried out well. Finally, the street landscape improvement project was not successfully implemented compared to other projects. The residents have negatively perceived the installation of facilities that they do not want, rarely use, or are poorly operated. this shows that the evaluation of residents is significant. They become the users of the revitalization project for the rural center. It is necessary to overcome problems such as project items chosen by professionals without local consultation and obvious design in the revitalization project of the local center. There is a need to ascertain the residents' opinion of each project and to encourage them to participate directly in the management operation.

This study is intended to prepare an revitalization plan of region where rural development project is completed through an analysis of the actual condition of facility operation and maintenance in the region where the project is completed. The results of survey of actual condition of facility operation in the region where rural development project was completed showed that the facilities were not self-sufficient in terms of operation and maintenance cost. Therefore, a prerequisite to the revitalization of region where the project is completed is to prepare an alternative plan for increasing the efficiency and applicability of currently already prepared facilities. Second, a project operation organization system should be streamlined and the competency of operation personnel should continue to be strengthened. Third, it is necessary to prepare a support system and establish cooperation networks for increasing the extensibility of project and continuing to induce community revitalization in the region where the project is completed in the future.