Uranium-contaminated soil can be effectively decontaminated through acid leaching; however, this process process generates significant amounts of radioactive wastewater. Therefore, developing efficient methods to remove uranium from wastewater is essential to minimize radioactive waste generation. This study investigates the applicability of various precipitation methods for uranium removal from acidic wastewater produced during soil-washing processes. Three methods were evaluated: metal hydroxide (M–OHx) co-precipitation, uranium peroxide (UO4) precipitation, and uranium phosphate (KUO2PO4) precipitation. The M–OHx precipitation method removes uranium by precipitating excess metal ions in wastewater by adjusting the pH. This method is easy to use and has a high removal efficiency. The UO4 and KUO2PO4 precipitation methods involve adding reagents to precipitate uranium in the mineral phase. They enable selective uranium separation and further volume reduction. In the results, M–OHx and KUO2PO4 precipitation methods remove uranium to less than 1 mg∙L−1 within 2 h, demonstrating superior capabilities compared to UO4 precipitation. The optimal method is different depended on the management strategy for the recovered uranium. The M–OHx precipitation method was suitable for permanent disposal, whereas KUO2PO4 could be recycled. Based on these findings, guidelines for the effective treatment of wastewater containing uranium from the soil-washing process can be established.
Uranium-contaminated soil can be cleaned using an acid washing process. However, high-concentration acid washing generates substantial amounts of radioactive waste, making it essential to develop a treatment process using low-concentration acid. This study evaluated the effectiveness of low-concentration sulfuric acid washing for uranium removal from contaminated soil. Experiments were conducted with a 0.05 M sulfuric acid solution. With a mixing ratio of soil to acid solution at 1:5, three consecutive washes were sufficient to remove uranium from contaminated soil to clearance level. During the acid washing process, real-time pH monitoring was performed to analyze the correlation between uranium leaching and pH changes. This led to the establishment of a monitoring-based process control strategy. In conclusion, we identified an effective method for removing uranium from soil under low acid concentration conditions. Consequently, significant reductions in radioactive waste generation are anticipated.
Uranium (U), an essential source for nuclear energy production, poses serious environmental and radiological threat due to its high mobility and long half-life. Uranophane [Ca(UO2)2SiO3(OH)2·5H2O], a secondary U silicate mineral, is known as a solubility-limiting phase in U mining deposits and nuclear waste repositories (controlling U immobilization). However, research on uranophane dissolution, particularly under the influence of organic and inorganic ligands, remains lacking. This study investigates uranophane synthesis and its dissolution at pH 8 through batch experiments using organic ligands (citric acid (CA) and humic acid (HA) at 50–150 ppm) and inorganic ligands (carbonate, nitrate, chloride, and silicate at 10−4 M to 10−6 M). Obtained results suggested that CA and carbonate significantly enhanced U release, reaching 27.6 ppm. Mixed systems containing both organic (50–150 ppm CA) and inorganic (10−4 M carbonate) ligands revealed increased U release, however were less effective than single-ligand systems due to competitive interactions with carbonate dominating U speciation. Visual MINTEQ modeling was used to identify uranyl complex species in the solutions. Dissolution rate and kinetic modeling were determined to predict U release trends. These findings emphasize the role of various ligand types in nature and their impact on U mobility, aiding remediation strategies for contaminated environments.
Acid-washed solutions containing various ions, including uranium, are produced by washing uranium-bearing soil or minerals with H2SO4. Conventional extraction processes are complex, as they involve multiple steps and generate significant amounts of radioactive organic waste, posing environmental risks. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a simplified process that can selectively extract uranium while minimizing radioactive waste production. In this study, thermodynamic equilibrium calculations were performed to investigate the selective extraction of uranium through its reaction with H2O2. A basic additive was introduced to facilitate this reaction. The calculation results indicated that uranium in acid-leached solutions could be selectively extracted through a single-step precipitation process, which was experimentally validated. These findings can be utilized to design an efficient process for obtaining high-purity uranium from uranium-bearing soil or minerals.
The potentiostatic titration method is one of the effective methods for determining the total uranium assay in high-concentration uranium samples. A notable approach is the Devies-Grey titration method, which was first reported in 1964. In the U sample treatment process of this method, the reduction of U(VI) by Fe(II) is initially a non-spontaneous reaction based on the reduction potentials of the two half-reactions. However, in a high-concentration phosphoric acid medium, the reduction potential of Fe(II) is enhanced, simultaneously increasing the reduction potential of U(VI). As a result, the redox reaction becomes spontaneous due to these dual effects. On the other hand, the reaction kinetics can elucidate why nitric acid does not oxidize U(IV) during the oxidation of Fe(II) to Fe(III). Furthermore, the role of Mo(VI)/Mo(V) as a redox enhancer, employed alongside nitric acid, can be comprehended through electrochemical means. Similarly, the function of V(IV) as an electrochemical enhancer, aiding the action of the Cr(VI) titrant, becomes understandable. Grasping the various phenomena that manifest during the titration process is imperative for refining existing titration methods and pioneering new ones.