This study is on the pedagogical convention of architectural history in Korea, especially that of Western Architecture. Recent institutional change in architectural school in Korea has caused overall restructuring of academic program. In spite of extension in the field of history there was no progress of method and way of thinking. There is no change in the point of view to see the western architecture and its history as a unique and specialized phenomenon in the civilization of mankind. Because of no recognition about for what, for whom, and how to, and because of orientalism, the cultural position of western architectural history and its narrative was not asked. With the help of post-colonialism, de-constructivism and critical historiography this paper tries to show the fundamental premise of western architectural history as a myth and show its prejudice as not being justifiable. The background of the discourse there has been a representation effect with regard to knowledge as a power. we need to escape from this kind of cognitional frame With the analysis of the its premise and narrative we can find it is a historical construct that was made in the age of imperialism. In fact it has a lot of false information and problematic point of view. The Identity and originality of western architecture and its history has no logical reason or foundation if we think that it depends on the difference and comparison with other civilization. For example the explanation of its historical origin western architecture has big difference with Islamic architecture in spite of the resemblance each other. This paper try to show several reasons that discourse of western architectural history can not be survived any longer. So we need to reconstruct new pedagogy with deconstruction for the students of non western, or Korean students. Because it has important effect to see and think about architecture and its history.

Main theme of this study is the acceptance phase of western architectural culture in modern east-north asia through a series of actual survey and typological analysis of existing church buildings in modern Korea. China. Japan. For this study, 126 modern church buildings of Korea, China, Japan are selected. Also, main subject of this study has deal with the side of culture - thought which background of christianity acceptance and acceptance mind of acceptance main-body, culture adaptation and transformation based on characteristic culturalization of Korea, China, Japan. Especially, I would consistently tried to see the acceptance phase of western architectural culture according to differential acceptance mind of acceptance main-body based on characteristic culturalization of three countries. Conclusively, in the point of view of western architectural culture acceptance phase, it could be said that Korean church architecture had characterized as a blending phase of the two eclectic architectural culture. And in the case of china, as a coexistance phase of the two architectural culture with more western style-oriented. On the other hand, Japanese church architecture had characterized as a syncretism phase of the both traditional and western architectural culture, though it is eclectic style-oriented. Therefore, it is thought that different acceptance mind of western culture had main factors caused of differential acceptance phase, when the two architectural culture, the traditional and the western, encounters.

동양과 서양은 과거에서부터 현재까지 서로의 문화적 차이를 인정하며 각자 발전을 추구 해왔다. 최근 인터넷 등의 영향으로 이러한 문화적 경계의 구분이 완화되어가고 있다. 그러나 수세기동안 각자의 문화권에서 발전을 이루어 왔던 보이지 않는 차이는 존재 한다. 따라서 디자인의 원천적인 소스는 다르다고 할 수 있다. 그중 우리가 주목해야 할 것 중의하나로 서양에서는 건축가가 가구를 직접 디자인하는 경우가 많다. 이런 현상은 과거에서부터 현재 까지 이루어지고 있다. 그러나 동양에서는 가구는 가구디자이너가 건축은 건축가가 따로 디자인하는 것이 일반적이다. 동서양이 문화적, 경제적으로 교류가 활발해진 최근에도 이런 관행은 지속되어가고 있다. 이는 분명히 역사적으로 특별한 계기가 있었으리라 추정할 수 있다. 연구의 절차로는 문화형성과 디자인의 체계, 건축과 가구의 연계성에 중점을 두었다. 연구하다 보면 표면적으로는 드러나지 않지만 동양과 서양의 오랜 관습과 문화를 바탕으로 디자인의 영역이 구분되어 왔다는 것을 알 수 있다. 이러한 현상이 현재의 디자인에도 영향을 미치고 있다는 점을 알 수 있을 것이다. 결과적으로 향후에는 가구디자인 분야가 건축, 인테리어 등 다양한 분야와 조율되어 발전시킬 수 있을 것이다. 동양과 서양의 문화적 차이에 의한 디자인과 관계된 다른 사례도 많이 있을 것이지만, 이번 연구를 기반으로 추후 유사한 맥락에서 연구할 분야가 많을 것으로 보여 진다.