This study shows the content production of mobile baseball games. In 2013, mobile games accounted for 23.9% of domestic games, and the global mobile game market is expected to grow to $30.3 billion by 2015. This study examines trends and characteristics of the mobile game industry. Also, this study intends to show mobile game rankings, reproduce the enthusiasm of professional baseball games through mobile games, participate in games to utilize leisure, and contribute to the mobile game industry. Currently, there is Magumagu of Netmarble as a mobile baseball game. By differentiating with mobile Magumagu, this study attempts to produce various and interesting short plays of AI, UI, and FSM from webtoon contents to engage in the realism of mobile baseball games, and to improve the productivity of the mobile game industry. Therefore, we intend to promote the game industry and activate game production contents.

영상 실감 증대를 위해 다양한 방법들이 제안되었고 활용되고 있으나, 후각정보를 활용한 실감향상은 아직 초 보적인 수준에 머무르고 있다. 기존 연구는 영상에 냄새를 포함하는 대상이 존재하는 경우 해당 향을 제시하면 실감이 증대된다는 결과를 보고하였다. 또한 영상의 주도적인 색상과 어울리는 향을 제시하면 몰입감이 증대된 다는 연구도 있다. 그러나 모든 영상에 뚜렷한 냄새 혹은 색상이 존재하는 것은 아니기 때문에 위 연구들은 분명 한 제한점을 가진다. 본 연구에서는 영상에 주도적인 냄새 혹은 색이 존재하지 않을 때 감성에 근거하여 향을 제 시할 경우 실감을 향상할 수 있을 것이라는 가정 하에, 다양한 향들이 전달하는 감성에 대한 형용사 프로파일을 구축하는 것을 목표로 하였다. 이를 위해 실험 1과 2를 통해 향을 묘사하기에 적절한 형용사를 수집하였고, 실험 3에서는 16가지 향에 대한 30개 형용사의 프로필을 작성하였다. 또한 군집분석을 통해 유사한 감성을 전달하는 향을 집단화 하였다. 이 결과는 영상 실감의 증대뿐만 아니라 향을 사용하여 제품이나 매장의 컨셉이나 포지셔 닝 등을 강조하는 등의 다양한 목적으로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

ABB式形容詞是現代漢語形容詞中的一種特殊形式, 其特殊性體現在詞的構成, 意義, 以及在句子中的語法功能。 本文談詞的構成時, 從構形法和構詞法兩方面入手, 分析其內部組合規律, 進一步探討ABB式形容詞, 何時詞根是A, 何時詞根是AB, 倂根據詞根特點, 給ABB式形容詞分類, 談其在句子中表示的意義。因ABB式形容詞詞根的性質和特性, 使其在語法功能上與性質形容詞有所不同。 本文通過對大量語言材料的分析, 總結出了ABB式形容詞, 在一定條件下, 可在句子中作主語, 謂語, 賓語, 狀語, 定語, 補語六大句子成分。並硏究出了ABB式形容詞不能在比較句、是非疑問句、形容詞非主謂句中作謂語, 不能受“不”“沒有”的否定, 不能出現在祈使句補語的位置, 不能充當感歎句中被强調, 感歎的成分。

In the Present-Day English adjectives and participles are often followed by a preposition plus V-ing (hereafter called PG construction). However, some adjectives and participles can be immediately followed by V-ing without an intermediate preposition (hereafter NG). Therefore, such adjectives/participles can have both NG and PG constructions. This article investigates 13 such predicates (happy, comfortable, bored, tired, fed up; busy, engaged, occupied; late, quick, slow, done, finished) in the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA) and examines the frequency changes of their NG vs PG structures in American English from 1820 to 2009. The findings of this study are as follows: (i) NG is a more recent structure than PG, (ii) the frequency of NG has gradually increased over time with most predicates, (iii) except engaged, the percentage of NG to PG was higher in the late 1900 than the early 1800, and with some predicates NG is more preferred than PG in the Present-Day English, (iv) as shown by the fact that some predicates were more resistant to the change, a linguistic innovation does not apply simultaneously but spread gradually across the relevant lexical items/structures.

Hyeree Kim. 2016. A Corpus-Based Study in the Diachronic Change of the Adjective/Participle+V-ing Construction. Studies in Modern Grammar 90, 1-30. In the Present-Day English adjectives and participles are often followed by a preposition plus V-ing (hereafter called PG construction). However, some adjectives and participles can be immediately followed by V-ing without an intermediate preposition (hereafter NG). Therefore, such adjectives/participles can have both NG and PG constructions. This article investigates 13 such predicates (happy, comfortable, bored, tired, fed up; busy, engaged, occupied; late, quick, slow, done, finished) in the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA) and examines the frequency changes of their NG vs PG structures in American English from 1820 to 2009. The findings of this study are as follows: (i) NG is a more recent structure than PG, (ii) the frequency of NG has gradually increased over time with most predicates, (iii) except engaged, the percentage of NG to PG was higher in the late 1900 than the early 1800, and with some predicates NG is more preferred than PG in the Present-Day English, (iv) as shown by the fact that some predicates were more resistant to the change, a linguistic innovation does not apply simultaneously but spread gradually across the relevant lexical items/structures.