Orchardgrass 및 white clover의 단파 및 혼파재배조건에서 미량요소 Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, Mo 및 B의 조합시비가 목초의 생육, 개화, 수량, 양분 함량 및 식생구성비율 등에 미치는 영향을 구명하였다. 다량료소 양분을 동일 량 시비한 조건에서 7 수준의 미량요소 조합시비는 T; 대조구, T; Fe, T; Fe+Mn, T； Fe＋Mn＋Cu, T; Fe+Mn+Cu＋Zn, T；Fe+Mn+Cu＋Zn+Mo 및 T； Fe+Mn+Cu+Zn+

Orchardgrass 및 white clover의 단파 및 혼파재배에서 미량요소 붕소(B)의 시비수준별 목초의 가시적 생육상, 뿌리/근류 형성, 수량성, 영양성분/무기양분 및 초종간 경합지수 등에 미치는 영향을 구명하였다. 처리내용은 다양 및 미량요소 시비를 동일하게 한 조건에서 5 수준의 붕소 처리: 1) ; 0.0, 2) ; 0.2, 3); 2.0. 4) ; 6.0, 5) ; 15.0me B/pot로 하였으며, glasshouse에서 pot시험으로

Crohn’s disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, involving gastrointestinal tract and extra-intestinal organs. IgA nephropathy is a rare extra-intestinal manifestation of Crohn’s disease. We describe a case of 21-year old Korean man who was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease 5 years after IgA nephropathy was suspected. At the age of 16, he had gross hematuria and 2 years after he was diagnosed with IgA nephropathy. Three years later, he complained of abdominal pain and diarrhea. He was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease by colonoscopy and histologic exams. There has been increasing evidences of common pathophysiology between the two diseases.

The accused took a cash card from its owner and threatened to harm the latter if he would not divulge the password to him. He then withdrew money from an ATM several times over. The crime of the accused consists of the following three steps: 1) forcibly taking a cash card; 1) forcibly taking a cash card; 2) threatening to harm the owner of the cash card if he would not divulge the password to him; and 3) inserting the cash card in the ATM card slot and entering the password to withdraw the money in the account. If the crime of the accused that was described above were subdivided into the above three steps, the following conclusions would be established: (1) forcibly taking a cash card falls within the crime of robbery; (2) threatening to harm the holder of a cash card if he does not divulge the password to the accused falls within the crime of coercion; and (3) inserting the card in the ATM card slot and entering the password to withdraw cash from the account falls within the crime of theft. There is no objection that the act of forcibly extracting a password from the owner of the cash card in (2) is included in the act of forcibly taking the cash card, thus establishing the crime of robbery. However, whether the crime of theft in (3) can be considered distinct or separate from the crime of robbery in (1) is the core issue of this case. The Supreme Court adjudged that withdrawing cash from an ATM using someone else’s cash card that was forcibly taken from the latter consists of the crime of theft and can be considered separate or distinct from the crime of robbery because the accused threatened to harm the victim if he would not cooperate. As such, the resistance of the victim was repressed when his cash card was being forcibly taken from him. Therefore, the victim did not give his consent to the accused to withdraw money from his ATM account using his cash card. It is, however, thought of as inappropriate to completely separate such act of theft from the preceding act—the “improper acquisition of a cash card”—even though the succeeding act, withdrawing cash from an ATM, falls within the crime of theft. Considering the characteristics of a cash card, it can be said that the act of forcibly taking a cash card should be considered a means or method of withdrawing cash from an ATM.