목적 : 신체균형 측정기를 이용하여 주시거리와 다양한 시각 상태가 신체 안정성에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 방법 : 대상자는 총 23명(23.92±2.09세)으로 진행하였으며, 시각 조건은 모두 ‘완전교정, 흐림 조건(시력 0.5 logMAR 미만) 그리고 10° 이내의 시야’이다. 신체 안정성 측정은 ‘3D Guidance‘를 사용하였다. 결과 : 완전교정 상태에서는 주시거리 간 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 없었다(p>0.050). 그러나 흐림 조건에서는 주시거리에 따라 측면 및 전·후면 흔들림에서 유의한 차이가 확인되었으며(p=0.004, p=0.027), 시야가 10° 이 내로 제한되었을 때에도 유의한 신체 흔들림이 관찰되었다(p<0.050). 결론 : 주시거리에 따라 신체 안정성의 변화가 나타나며, 특히 흐림과 제한된 시야 상태에서는 주시거리에 따른 차이가 더 유의하였다.

Objective : This paper presents an empirical study on the bias toward the disabled by the students studying occupational therapy, who will make an expert group to take care of them in the future. It was investigated how much sense of distance the students had according to the physical characteristics of the disabled. Method : Total 128 students majoring in occupational therapy were asked to fill out a self-administered questionnaire. The physical characteristics of the disabled and the sense of distance toward the disabled were measured as follows: The visible physical characteristics of the disabled were restricted to the disorders of external physical functions based on the Article 29 ‘Classification of the Disabled’ of the Disabled Welfare Act. The functional characteristics of the disabled were measured by using the FIM (Functional Independence Measure) method. Meanwhile, Westie (1952)’s inventory of the sense of distance was adopted for the inventory for the sense of distance toward the disabled in the study. Results : The subjects showed the biggest sense of distance toward the disabled in the order of the disabled with encephalopathy, physical handicap, language disorder, visual disturbances and acoustic disturbances. As for the functional characteristics, the sense of distance was the greatest in the order of the completely dependent disabled, partially dependent disabled, and completely independent disabled. The average sense of the distance was compared in terms of the subjects’ school and year, and the results revealed there were statistically significant differences in all the areas except for the sense of distance toward the completely dependent disabled. Conclusions : The sample needs to be expanded in number, and random sampling is required to secure diverse social and cultural backgrounds. In addition, the causality verification should be done in order to understand the nature of sense of distance in a study on it according to the physical characteristics of the disabled. Finally, an evaluation tool needs to be developed that can be used to measure the sense of distance toward the disabled.