제주도 내에서 서식하는 운문산반딧불이(Luciola unmunsana)의 분포현황, 출 현 시기 그리고 개체 크기에 대한 분석을 위해 2013년 6월부터 7월 초까지 총 12개 지점을 중심으로 조사를 실시하였다. 조사지역 중 한라산 지역은 한라산을 관통하 는 일부 국도를 중심으로 내부 산림지역을 조사하였으며 그 외 주요 오름(곶자왈) 은 내부 지역 전체를 조사하였다. 조사방법은 선조사법과 정점조사법을 병행하였 으며, 일부 개체는 채집하여 액침 보관하였다. 총 12개 지점 모두에서 운문산반딧 불이가 채집되었는데, 그 중 제주시 한경면 청수리, 제주시 조천읍 선흘리, 서귀포 시 남원읍 신례리 등지에서 오후 21시, 100m를 기준으로 각각 393, 141, 250마리를 나타냄에 따라 가장 높은 출현빈도로 기록되었다. 이는 국내 내륙지역의 주요 반딧 불이 출현 지역과 비교하여 보았을 때 국내 최대 반딧불이 서식지로 판단되며 이에 대한 보전대책이 필요할 것으로 보인다. 이들의 출현 기간은 6월 중순부터 시작하 여 6월 말경(6월 20~30일 사이)에 최고점을 나타내었으며 최종적으로 7월 중하순 까지 출현하는 것으로 나타나 내륙지역의 출현 시기보다 2-3주가량 늦게 출현하는 것으로 나타났다. 한편, 본 연구에서 채집된 제주도 개체들은 전 개체가 운문산형으로 나타났으며, 앞날개길이(Elytral Length, EL)를 측정한 결과 5.16~6.91(5.91±0.48, n=48)mm로 측정되었다. 내륙의 개체들과 비교를 위해 3개 지역의 개체를 비교하였는데 부산 6.54~8.53(7.59±0.54, n=30)mm, 충북 옥천 6.52~8.40(7.47±0.52, n=30)mm 등으 로 나타나 제주도의 개체들이 내륙의 개체에 비해 현저히 작은 것으로 나타났으며 인천에서 채집된 파파리형 6.27~7.77(7.09±0.46, n=7)mm 보다도 작게 나타남에 따라 추후 분류학적 검토가 필요할 것으로 보인다.

2001-2012까지 대구지역에서 119 구조대에 의한 사회성 말벌의 벌집제거 출동건수를 보면 총 11,948건으로 나타났으며 이 건수는 매년 증가하고 있는 추세이다. 특히 2008년 이후로 그 증가세가 급격하게 증가하였는데 2001년 147건에 비해 2012년에는 4,979건으로 약 34배 증가하였다. 이들 출동은 주로 7-9월에 가장 높게 나타내었는데 이는 벌집이 가장 성숙된 시기와 일치한다. 대구 내 상습 피해 지역은 12년 동안 북구 지역이 2,825건으로 가장 많은 신고건수를 나타내었으나 단위면적당으로 보면 남구 지역이 33.60으로 가장 높게 나타나 실질적인 피해가 가장 높은 지역으로 나타났다. 따라서 도시 내 말벌의 피해에 대한 방제 및 조절은 남구가 가장 우선적으로 그 대상지가 되어야 할 것이다. 대구 도심지에서 나타나는 말벌종은 13종으로 나타났으며 그중 왕바다리(Polistes rothneyi koreanus)가 집중적으로 피해를 일이키는 것으로 나타났으며 최근 아열대 침입종 등검은말벌(Vespa velutina nigrithorax)이 도시 내에서 그 분포를 늘려가고 있어 피해가 예상된다. 대구지역에서 말벌의 영소가 급격히 증가하는 원인은 도시 내 녹지대의 증가가 가장 큰 원인으로 생각되어지며, 그 외 영소 장소의 안전성, 도시 내 높은 온도에 따른 콜로니 발육 증대, 낮은 빈도의 포식 및 기생률 등으로 보여 진다.

This paper discusses the rationale for establishing the interval from the Gabo Reforms (1895) to the liberation from Japan (1945) as the modern Korean language period for teaching the history of Korean language or the life history of Korean language. Such setting of this period arose from the critical awareness regarding the school grammar curriculum which defines modern Korean language as the language developed during the era between the Imjin War and the end of the Gaehwa period. The issue of differentiating by period the history of Korean language in the school grammar curriculum is seen as a problem that arose from a simplistic use of the term “modern” as it is applied in the life history of Korean language. To properly establish the modern period of Korean language, a balanced perspective is required regarding the concept of history which is affected by opposing approaches, such as those of positivist and relativist historical views and micro and macro histories. In addition, since the modernity in modern history has freedom and equality language life inequality in the history of language should become the key perspective. From this standpoint, the establishment of modern Korean language must be looked at of the human agent as its basic attributes, the overcoming of contradictions such as from the basis of written language rather than spoken, and the identity of spoken and written language which holds the issue of equality in language life should become the key yardstick for establishing the period of modern Korean language. Hence the Gabo-Reforms which occasioned King Gojong’s Royal Decree on Korean Language (1895) and the publication of the DoknipShinmun(1896) should be set as the starting point of modern Korean language .Moreover, since Koreans fully became the principal agents of Korean language and the Hangeul-only Law was enacted in the wake of the liberation from Japan(1945), the liberation should be taken as the line that divides modern Korean from contemporary Korean language

This paper stipulates Sejong and Saussure as integrative linguists that based their work on scholastic research, and by comparing their representative works, "Hunminjeongeum with Commentaries" and "General Linguistics Lectures" which were published by people close to them, this paper shows the modernity and post-modernity of their linguistics in terms of their discursive significance. The modernity of Saussure’s linguistics was revealed through scientific methodology of language research using such analysis strategies as langue-centered language research. Although Sejong’s methods were different, he also applied the same scientific and universal rationalism in his invention of letters. Saussure was definitely a modern structuralist, he also opened the possibility of integrative linguistics. Sejong also fully showed such two-sided characteristic through Hunminjeongeum. He had thoroughly expressed the two-sided characteristic in the principles of Hunminjeongeum letters by paying attention to both universality and uniqueness. The differences between these two become prominent in terms of history and the subject. Saussure used the strategy of trying to eliminate historicity through the dichotomy of diachronie and synchronie. In contrast, Sejong naturally accommodated the Asian historical tradition. Ultimately, the linguistics of Sejong and Saussure are integrative (fusional). The setting of the issues and strategy of Saussure, who wanted to establish a unique domain for linguistics, in fact premised a fusion or integration between linguistics and other scholarly disciplines, or requested such a result. The creation of Sejong’s Hunminjeongeum is the result of scholastic fusion of such disciplines as linguistics, music, and science.

This study examines the background, motivation and purpose of the creation of Hunminjeongeum, which previous research has not poured much attention. The study makes multiple categorization with regard to the motivation and purposes revealed in the preface written by King Sejong. It divides the intention of Hunminjeongeum into two parts: politics-society (p-s) and language-culture(l-c). As for the background fact of p-s, I mentioned the needs of edification and, for the l-c part, I mentioned contradictory relation between the spoken language and the written language through Chinese writing and Idu(吏讀). Motivation and purposes are again divided into a main part and a secondary part. For the main side of p-s factor, I dealt with the efficiency of edification policy and edification purpose. This part also embraces the laws and ordinances regarding agricultural knowledge. And for the l-c factor, I mentioned the problems in the distribution of documents and in the communication with lower classes through Chinese writing and Idu. The secondary part is also divided into p-s and l-c factors. The minor section regarding the motivation and purposes of p-s factor is the disorder of the earlier period of the Joseon dynasty and the justification of the dynasty. For the minor section regarding the motivation and purposes of l-c factor is the confusion of the Chinese pronunciation. Through this classification, this study aims to help to grasp the true meaning and process of the creation of Hunminjeongeum.

This study focuses on constructing discourstics utilizing the methodology of linguistic analysis. Discourstics is a theory which analyses meaning and signification through context and discourse. This th∞ry originated from reflections on dichotomy, universalism, reductionism, and how we think of those characteristics as being part of diversity. The integrated study of discourstics is one area of linguistics that main1y deals with the construction of language. 1n discourstics, construction of the process of becoming discourse is examined. 1n view of this, ’text’ is a discourse unit within linguistics, ’statement’ is a pait of the text, ’arrangement (agencement)’ is the method of constructing statements. Contextualization and formation for processing and analyses of discourses are necessary. Contextualizing is the construction of context of the text through which the text becomes concrete. There are three paradigms: the value paradigm, the theme p따adigm， and the subjectivity p따adigm. Mea띠ng is constructed through contextualization and formation. This shows how the context is comprehended and how the meaning of communication through statements and discourse is significant. The effect of discourse strategy results in various signification. Therefore, discourstics is suggested to be an effective tool in analyzing the diversity and complexity of language in a social context.

Kim, Seul-Ong. 2004. A Study of the New Categorization of Hangeul Names and their Social Meaning. The Sociolinguistics Journal of Korea 12(2). This paper suggests a new direction of making Hangeul names in view of the Hangeul(Korean Alphabet) cultural community. We newly organize the concept and category of Hangeul names which include names of a Chinese character written in Hangeul as much as the names of the original Korean vocabulary. This type of combination produces, for example, from “슬기(seul-gi)” and “지혜(chi-hye)”, “슬지(seul-chi), 슬혜(seul-hye), 기지(ki-chi), 기혜(ki-hye), 지슬(chi-seul), 지기(chi-gi), 혜슬(hye-seul), 혜기(hye-gi)”. Through this method, we will be able to gain the following results: (1) We can make more human names with Hangeul, (2) We will be able to overcome the dichotomy between Chinese characters and Hangeul, (3) We will be able to truly accomplish a cultural community using Hangeul writing system.