우리는 CFHT에 부착된 OASIS 분광기, MR 1 그리즘으로 관측한 방출선 중, Hβ와 [O III] 5007 방출선을 분 석하여, 제 2형 세이퍼트 은하 Mrk 1의 운동학적 특성을 파악하였다. [O III] 금지선의 가우시안 선 윤곽 분석을 통해 초과하는 청색 이동 성분의 방출 영역이 비대칭적으로 보이는데, (1) 은하 중심부 약 960 pc거리에서 플럭스는 최대를 보이고, (2) 은하 중심부에서 NS 방향으로 ~900 km s−1인 큰 선폭 지역이 있음을 확인하였다. 두 원소의 분광 영상에서 보이는 시선 속도의 특징은 NE 방향에서 접근하는 가스의 흐름이, SW 방향으로 적색 이동, 즉 멀어지는 가스의 흐름 이 나타나 반시계 방향 은하의 회전 경향성을 보여준다. 시선 속도 자료로부터 은하 중심은 우리를 향해 접근하는 먼 지 가스가 가리고 있음을 파악하였다.

고층건물의 진동응답을 저감시키기 위한 다양한 방법들이 연구되고 있다. 이들 진동응답의 저감 연구는 건물의 외관을 병화 시키는 방법과 건물에 부가감쇠장치를 설치하는 방법들이 있는데 본 논문에서는 고층 건물의 형태의 변화에 다른 진동변위응답의 특성을 파악하고자 한다. 고층건물의 형태변화 중에서도 외관에 테이퍼를 수는 방법을 사용하였다. 기류의 특성은 도심 및 교외지역을 중심으로 풍동실험을 실시하였다.

This is a treatise on the legality of the practice of attaching the crime counts exhibit as the part and parcel of the indictment or information (hereinafter referred to as ‘indictment’). Recently, the Korean Supreme Court decided the exhibit will not be considered as a part of the indictment. In Korea, it became conventional that the prosecution attached the exhibit of the crime counts stored in CD-ROM because the printout of the voluminous crime counts, such as those of the copyright infringement and the privacy infringement, bloats to the tune of several millions and tens of million pages. But this time, the Supreme Court decided that this kind of practice is not tenable anymore. But this decision of the Supreme Court seems at odds with the plain interpretation of the current criminal procedure law because ‘whatever is attached to the content of the indictment constitute a part of the whole indictment’ is the literal construction of the text of law. Moreover, it is strange to render it illegal when indictment attach the footnote that the crime count is so voluminous that the specifics will be appended in the CD-ROM format and actually appends the crime counts exhibit. It is not only illogical but also impractical to interpret that the appended crime exhibit is out of the scope of the indictment or is overstepping the bounds of the court hearing. It is well known that, in certain types of crime, such as the copyright infringement or the privacy infringement, crime counts exhibit extend to tens of thousand pages. If we stick to the traditional notion that all the crime counts should be presented in the physical document format, it will be not only impractical but also tremendous waste of efforts and expenses. If we take into account the recent development that the electronic document usage steadily replacing the paper document usage in civil and criminal justice system and peoples are sufficiently accustomed to the data storage devices, providing the crime counts exhibit in the form of electronic storage will be conducive to enhancing the interest of the defense if we take into account that it is time-saving and efforts-saving to analyze and archive the case record in the electronic platform. It is the right time to revise the criminal procedure law to avoid the controversy on the permissibility of the presenting the crime counts exhibit in the form of the electronic storage. It will be desirable to allow the prosecution to present the crime counts exhibit in the form of electronic storage unless it will curtail the right of the defendant and if it will meet the practical necessity of the court to authenticate the crime counts of the indictment.