한국어는 ‘-이-, -히-, -리-, -기-’ 등과 같은 접미사가 첨가되어 흔 히 단일 피동문을 형성하는데 ‘-어지-’를 가하여 이중피동이라고 칭하고 구성된 것이다. 이 연구는 ‘피동접미사 + -어지-’ 구성을 대상으로 삼아, 이의 실제 언어 현실에서 구어로 많이 사용되는 양상과 통사 및 의미 특 징을 밝히는 것을 목적으로 한다. 구체적으로, ‘피동접미사 + -어지-’ 구 성에서 ‘-이/히/리/기-’와 ‘-어지-’가 함께 사용될 때, ‘-이/히/리/기-’ 가 피동의 의미를 유지하면서 ‘-어지-’의 피동 의미가 약해지고 다른 의 미가 발생한다는 주장을 제시한다. 연구 방법론은 국립국어원의 일상 대 화 말뭉치 2020(버전 1.1)을 중심으로 자료를 수집하고, 필요에 따라 인 터넷 자료를 보완적으로 활용한다. 이를 통해 ‘피동접미사 + -어지-’ 구 성의 양상을 추출하고, 다음으로는 통사적 특징을 서술어 제약, 시제나 양태를 나타내는 어미 제약, 보조용언 제약, 부정문 제약으로 구분하여 논의한다. 마지막으로, ‘피동접미사 + -어지-’ 구성의 의미 특징을 검토 하면서 ‘-어지-’의 의미는 ‘동작의 진행’을 강조하는 강조법과 ‘능력’이나 ‘무의도’의 양태 의미로 분석한다. ‘피동접미사 + -어지-’ 구성의 사용이 점차 늘어가고 있는 추세에서 보면 본 연구가 이 구성이 문법적인 표현으로 인정하는 것을 힘써서 일반적인 언어 변화의 양상을 고찰한 의의가 있다.

Climatologists have warned rapid climate change of the earth and it will cause a big disaster worldwide. the rapid climate change is mostly due to emission of greenhouse gases. To reduce greenhouse gases, many countries have prepared protocols, agreements, and treaties. IMO(International Maritime Organization) have established the protocol to decrease ship’s greenhouse gases emission and they consider the nuclear power source is an option to replace fossils fuels. Our study focused on elemental technologies related to a nuclear powered ship and, the passive residual heat removal system(PRHRS) is one of topics in our study. As the mandatory of the post Fukushima accident, PRHRS for a nuclear powered ship has been studied. We invented the new concepts of PRHRS which is optimized to a nuclear powered ship. The numerical analysis results indicated that the system is very reasonable. Based on the numerical analysis, an experiential loop was set and we preliminary tested the performance of the system under the reduced scale. The experimental results came with the numerical analysis results well.

根据使动标记的‘叫/让’实现被动意义的语法变化过程，我们能预测到使动 与被动之间的关联性。本稿在此基础上，以Goldberg(1995:손영숙‧정주리 譯, 2004)的构式语法的观点考查了其相关因素是怎样相联的。为了将‘叫/ 让’实现成被动，句首论元的受事性质和使动者的潜在发挥重要的作用，但 使动与被动的共同且不变的事件结构就是原因-结果的致使结构。换句话 说，构成句子的两个事件基于因果关系，这就是相连使动与被动的重要因 素。对同样的一个事件，使动的认知焦点在原因和结果，而被动的认知焦点 在结果，根据这些认知观点和Goldberg理论，可以判断使动是被动的上位 概念，因而它们之间的关联性也可以用‘部分关系继承(subpart link)’来解释 它们之间的关联性。

现代汉语的被动句可分为有标志被动句与无标志被动句。其中无标志被 动句与null subject主题句，在形式方面结构非常相似。因此，它们的分类 及分析方法上有很多错误。为了补充形式上的解释，本稿采取认知语言学的 观点来解释被动句的制约条件，进而来区分无标志被动句与null subject主 题句。按词汇概念，被动句的‘相(aspect)’和无标志被动句的事件可分别分析 为下面的意义结构。[[[xACT]CAUSE[BECOME[y<STATE>]]]CAUSE[BECOME[y<AF FECTED>]]] → [[do'[∅<manner>(y)]]CAUSE[BECOME[y<AFFECT ED>]]]。这个结构说明的最大的特征就是被影响论项(而不是受事论项)的存 在。而加上‘相(aspect)’的特征的话，可以表现为[y<RES-STATE=∅[[do' [∅<manner>(y)]]CAUSE[BECOME[y<AFFECTED>]]]>]。如果句子符 合这些制约条件，它可以分确定为无标志被动句。

This paper examines the difference of degree of acceptability for suffix passive constructions and -eojida passive constructions, and the double-passive constructions in which both are combined. Afterwards, claim that the doublepassive constructions should be regarded as a well-formed passive constructions like the other two passive constructions. For this, we compare the acceptability of the acceptability of the double-passive constructions, suffix passive constructions and the -eojida passive constructions using descriptive statistics and one-way repeated measures ANOVA. As a result, the acceptability of the suffix sentence is highest, followed by the double-passive constructions and the -eojida passive constructions. Although double-passive constructions is treated as a non-grammatical sentence in school grammar, some items have the highest acceptability of double-passive constructions, as can be seen from the descriptive statistics. In addition, it is higher than the acceptability of the -eojida passive constructions in all questions. Taking these results into consideration, a double-passive constructions can be regarded as a qualified passive sentence, just like the other two passive constructions. In consequently, double-passive constructions can be interpreted as a combination of passive and other meanings (potential, unintentional, etc.).