본 연구는 정원문화의 확산과 농촌이주에 대한 대중의 인식을 빅데이터 기반으로 분석하여 농촌공간의 사회적·정서적 가치에 대한 시사점을 도출하고자 하였다. 최근 치유농업, 정신건강 증진, 농촌 정주 촉진 등 국가적 정책 흐름 속에서 정원과 농촌 이주가 어떻게 디지털 공간에서 담론화되고 있는지를 탐색하였다. 네이버와 다음의 블로그 및 카페로부터 2015년 7월부터 2024년까지 수집된 비정형 데이터를 대상으로 텍스트마이닝 기법을 적용하였다. 분석 방법으 로는 키워드 빈도분석, TF-IDF, N-gram 연결망 분석, Louvain 클러스터링, 감성분석을 활용하였 다. 분석 결과 귀농귀촌은 ‘교육’, ‘지원’, ‘주택’ 등의 제도적 기반에 대한 관심이 강하게 나타났 으며, 귀촌정원은 ‘꽃’, ‘전원주택’, ‘텃밭’ 등 정서적 만족과 자연 친화적 주거 환경에 대한 수요를 보여주었다. 농촌정원은 ‘체험’, ‘마을’, ‘자연’ 등 공동체 기반의 참여형 콘텐츠로 인식되 고 있었다. 클러스터 분석에서는 정책수혜형, 감성치유형, 공동체정착형, 예술창작형 등 다층적 인 귀농 및 정원 유형이 도출되었으며, 감성분석 결과 전체 텍스트의 80% 이상이 긍정적 감정을 나타내었다. 본 연구는 농촌 정원과 귀농귀촌 활동이 단순한 공간 활용이나 이주를 넘어 정서적 공감, 정책적 수혜, 문화적 창작의 플랫폼으로 기능하고 있음을 보여준다. 연구 결과는 향후 정원산업 진흥, 치유농업 활성화, 농촌 정주 정책 수립을 위한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있다.

이 연구는 결혼이주남성의 사회적 네트워크가 이주를 통해 어떻게 변 화하며 재구축되는가, 이러한 변화에 영향을 미친 요인은 무엇인가를 탐 색해봄으로써 이들이 한국 사회에서 살아가는 모습을 거시ㆍ중시ㆍ미시적 차원에서 연구했다. 이를 위해 사회연결망분석(Social Network Analysis) 을 기반으로 결혼이주남성의 사회적 네트워크를 분석했다. 연구 대상은 농촌지역 거주 결혼이주남성으로 생애사적 관점의 심층인터뷰를 통해 자 료를 수집했다. 연구 결과 이주 전에는 광범위한 네트워크를 구축하고, 가정 내 중심적 위치를 차지했던 연구참여자가 이주 후에는 거시적 사회 구조와 환경이 긍정적으로 변했음에도 미시적, 중시적 차원의 제약이 네 트워크를 위축시켰다. 또한 네트워크 구조와 효과에 의해 연구참여자의 가정 내 위치는 중심에서 주변으로 이동되었으며, 정착지에서의 소통 단 절과 고립으로 인한 위축된 삶이 나타났다.

This study analyzes the effect of the level of satisfaction with the living environment of rural people on migration. The analysis data were used by the Rural Development Administration for the survey of welfare systems for farmers and fishermen in 2017, and samples of 3,776 were used for the analysis. The analysis variables were divided into a group of migrants, a group of permanent residents, and a group of decision-keeping, and the level of satisfaction with the living environment of each of the 10 rural areas was used as an independent variable. According to the analysis results, the basic living base and safety of rural residents were having a positive effect. The results show that the projects for developing rural areas, which increase the basic living base, are making substantial contributions to preventing the breakaway of the rural population. Safety has been neglected in the area of rural planning, but if the level of discontent is not enough, it has had the greatest impact on the livelihoods of rural residents. Welfare and cultural leisure set the main demand level for welfare and cultural leisure to the elderly and vulnerable classes, and interpret it as a result of weakened defense against stress from relocation of residence, difficulty of migration due to low income levels, and migration. Therefore, the paradoxical analysis results could be interpreted as showing that measures to increase the satisfaction of the people on welfare and cultural leisure should be taken.

This is a study of a residential area for displaced villagers planned for residents of Gyodo Village who must evacuate their hometown because of flooding due to the Hantan River Dam Project. The study aims to construct a plan for a new residential area for the villagers focusing on reflecting the existing characteristics of their former village and on ensuring sustainability for the new village. Departing from previous practice of focusing on merely physical aspects when planning, the current study is significant in that it presents a new planning process and method for a sustainability-focused plan. While the study has many limitations such as objectivity in the process of deriving the sustainability indicators and the appropriateness of the indicator questions, it is hoped that future studies on sustainability will serve to make up for these limitations and problems.

The objective of this research was to develop a rural settlement demand model to analyze the determinants of settlement demand of urban residents. The point aimed at from model development was deriving stated preference of potential consumers towards rural settlement through setting a hypothetical market, and using settlement subsidy as a surrogate variable for price in the demand model. The adequate demand model deducted from hypothetical market data was derived from the basis of Hanemann's utility difference theory. In the rural settlement demand model, willingness to accept was expressed by a function of settlement subsidy. Data utilized in the analysis was collected from surveys of households nationwide. According to inferred results of the demand model, settlement subsidy had a significant influence on increasing demand for rural settlement. A significant common element was found among variables affecting demand increase through demand curve shift. The majority group of those with high rural settlement demand sought agricultural activity as their main motive, due to harsh urban environments aggravated by unstable job market conditions. Subsequently, restriction of income opportunities in rural areas does not produce an entrance barrier for potential rural settlers. Moreover, this argument could be supported by the common trend of those with high rural settlement demand generally tending to have low incomes. Due to such characteristics of concerned groups of rural settlement demand, they tended to react susceptibly to the subsidy provided by the government and local autonomous entities.