The Chinese Sigyeong records the foods of the Primitive Pickling Period, pickling being a universal vegetable storage method, but does not indicate the origin of the pickled vegetables or the location of the source of transmission. Kimchi mainly used salt and sauce-based soaking materials at the beginning of the Fermented Pickling Period (beginning in the 1st to 3rd centuries A.D.), and it differed from the Chinese method, which used alcohol and vinegar. In the Umami-Flavored Pickling Period (beginning in the 14th and 15th centuries A.D.), jeotgal, fermented seafoods, were added, and pickles with a completely new identity were created, one different from any other pickles in the world. Lastly, entering the Complex Fermentation and Pickling Period (beginning in the 17th and 18th centuries), the technical process evolved using a separate special seasoning containing red pepper as the secondary immersion source after pickling in brine, the primary immersion source. As a result of this, kimchi was transformed into a food with a unique form and taste not found anywhere else. The unique characteristic of kimchi is that the composition of original materials, a combination of salted marine life and vegetable ingredients, is its core identity, and there is a methodological difference in that it is completed through a second process called saesaengchae (生菜)-chimchae (沈菜).

A Study on the Discussion for the Indefendent Charater and the No-cause Character of the Real Rights Behavior The most controversial topic in the Korean civil law academic circle so far is the theory of Real Rights Behavior, which has centered on the the Indefendent Charater and the No-cause Character of Real Rrights Behavior. The core of the controversy over the No-cause Character of Real Rights Behavior is the legal interest of securing transaction safety, and the theoretical basis necessary to argue whether the No-cause Character of Real Rights Behavior is the recognition of the identity of Real Rights Behavior. In the end, the fierce debate, which has been held for the practical legal interest of securing transaction safety, is believed to be due to the lack of a realistic legal system and its regulations, and the unreasonable application of uncritical foreign theories. In other words, the Auflassung system to supplement the formalism examination system of registration in Germany secured transaction safety by strengthening the function of strengthening the credibility of registration. However, in the absence of such systems and related laws, the Korean civil law community borrowed German theories and applied them excessively, and constant debate reproduced them. In order to protect the realistic legal interests of transaction safety and to establish a consistent theoretical system in academia, it is necessary to supplement related systems through legislation